search for: mathforum

...ing LLVM CFE. This has been shown to work correctly. </QUOTE> However currently latest gcc version in Cygwin is 3.3.3. So, it seems that currently it is impossible to build LLVM and the GCC front-end under Cygwin (?). Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...rt : D3 - the Stepanov abstraction penalty benchmark - tech report : D4 - comparing function objects to function pointers - tech report : D5 - measuring the cost of synchronized I/O - virtual vs. ordinary methods -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...de for GCC 3.4.3 from the GCC website (http://gcc.gnu.org), compile it with GCC 3.3.3 that came with Cygwin, and then use your newly built GCC 3.4.3 compiler to build LLVM and the LLVM GCC frontend. -- John T. > Alex Vinokur > email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com > http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html > http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn > >_______________________________________________ >LLVM Developers mailing list >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu >http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev > >

...http://gcc.gnu.org), compile it with GCC 3.3.3 that came > with Cygwin, and then use your newly built GCC 3.4.3 compiler to build > LLVM and the LLVM GCC frontend. > > -- John T. > > > Alex Vinokur > > email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com > > http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html > > http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn > > > >_______________________________________________ > >LLVM Developers mailing list > >LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu > >http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/ll...

...e ago. I checked that again. * It is compiled fine with g++ 3.3. * It isn't compiled with g++ 3.4. I have such a problem with my other projects. I should update C/C++ Perfometer to suit it to g++ 3.4. Thanks again. -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...s for Linux/x86 (6.2M) d.. GCC Front End Binaries for Solaris/Sparc (6.6M) e.. GCC Front End Binaries for MacOS X/PowerPC (7.0M) f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) What do I have to dowonload for for Cygwin? -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn _______________________________________________ LLVM Developers mailing list LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/mailman/listinfo/llvmdev ___________________________________________...

...: % cd llvm % ./configure [options...] % gmake tools-only 2.1. Which options should I use with ./configure [options...]? 2.2. Cygwin doesn't have gmake: $ which gmake gmake: Command not found. Could I use make? -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...naries for Linux/x86 (6.2M) d.. GCC Front End Binaries for Solaris/Sparc (6.6M) e.. GCC Front End Binaries for MacOS X/PowerPC (7.0M) f.. GCC Front End Source Code (30.0M) What do I have to dowonload for for Cygwin? -- Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

...t > system for doing benchmarks as the Cygwin "layer" over Win32 is fairly > involved. > [snip] Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin issues figured out. How can I know of that? Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:13:21AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > Thank you for that information. I will wait until you get Cygwin > issues figured out. How can I know of that? Check out the link to the Cygwin nightly tester results here: http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ Wait until most of the asterisks in the test results go away. :) The tester runs nightly, so checking every few

...isks at * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ By the way, is it possible to send a relevant announce to * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.announce * gmane.comp.compilers.llvm.devel Alex Vinokur email: alex DOT vinokur AT gmail DOT com http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html http://sourceforge.net/users/alexvn

On Tue, Dec 28, 2004 at 10:52:28PM -0800, Reid Spencer wrote: > On Tue, 2004-12-28 at 22:42, Misha Brukman wrote: > > > This would be the right one, so maybe if we ask Reid nicely, he'll > > do it (as he maintains the Cygwin nightly tester). > > I haven't used Net News since its signal-to-noise ratio dropped below > my tolerance level (circa 1995). However, if

This is a very basic question, so please bear with me. I've been learning about AB Testing, which is largely used in internet marketing to examine the effectiveness of certain aspects of ads, websites, etc. Here's a couple links to people who want to know more about AB Testing:

On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 08:37:46AM +0200, Alex Vinokur wrote: > But it seems that there are no asterisks at > * http://llvm.cs.uiuc.edu/testresults/ > * http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/ That's because there was a build error (see the big red notice). Check out http://llvm.x10sys.com/testresults/Cygwin/2004-12-27.html > By the way, is it possible to send a relevant

On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > > have less impact than for a CPU bound program). In any case, I've added > > this program to the LLVM testsuite as > > SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++/bigfib.cpp, so we should have numbers for > > it generated every night on multiple platforms. > > > [snip] > > Newsgroup

On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Alex Vinokur wrote: > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. Out of curiousity, I ran some quick tests on a AMD Athlon(TM) MP 2100+ box running Redhat linux 7.1. With the LLVM C

Alex Vinokur wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to use LLVM-GCC to compare its performance with other compilers. > Something like testsuite "Computing very large Fibonacci numbers" at > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c%2B%2B.perfometer/37. > > > My environment: > ----------------- > Windows 2000 > Cygwin > $ uname -srom > CYGWIN_NT-5.0