search for: math_pow

Dan, I have a large list of functions(60+) that I want to be legalized. I have currently been adding them in the same manner as pow/exp etc... These functions come in both scalar and vector versions of up to 16 elements as the 1.0 spec requires. Is this something that I could Merge back into the tree or is another approach required? Some of the thoughts we were having as not to clutter the llvm

On Apr 8, 2009, at 12:43 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Micah, > >> There seems to be some math library functions that are already built >> into llvm as intrinsic(pow, exp, etc...) but there are lots that >> are not >> built in yet. Is there currently work going on that is implementing >> these? I do not want to duplicate work so I want to see what is out

...e this into the main tree. I'm interested to hear if anyone else has an opinion here. An llvm.math namespace seems like a good idea. Instead of using "fpow" though, I'd prefer to just use names like "pow". For consistency, the ISD namespace operators could be renamed to MATH_POW and similar. The text in LangRef.html that describes the semantics of llvm.pow needs improvement. Here's an attempt at an improved description of error handling for LLVM intrinsic math functions: The @llvm.math intrinsics use floating-point exceptions according to IEEE rules for the correspon...

...script: Added implementation of Math_log. jscript: Added Math_sin implementation. jscript: Added implementation of Math_sqrt. jscript: Added Math_tan implementation. jscript: Fix integer/double parsing. jscript: Fixed memory leak. jscript: Added implementation of Math_pow with less then 2 arguments. jscript: Fix parse_double_literal implementation. jscript: Remove NaN related FIXMEs. jscript: Fix DateConstr_value (with no argument) implementation. jscript: Added Date_setTime implementation. Rico Sch?ller (2): d3d10: Improve parse_fx10....