search for: massives

I'm new to the world of linux, and I was wondering if you could help me out. There reason, I'm come over to linux, is to try and create a massive virtual drive, that I could attacth to my servers, and have them use it. Speed is not essential, but functionality is. There are not that many people logging onto the network, only about thirty, and there are no mission critical applications

Hello, I've got dovecot 2.3 going and a mailbox with a lot of system messages in it. What I'm wanting to do is massively move them to another mailbox. Is this doable with sieve? Thanks. Dave.

Dear All, I have a massive dataset from which I would like to draw a histogram. Any ideas on how to accomplish this? Thanks in advance, Paul

So, as you all probably noticed, the APIs for creating constants have been moved (or in a specific cases, are about to be moved) from static methods on Constant to instance methods on LLVMContext. However, as was recently pointed out on llvm-commits and on IRC, this is no longer strictly necessary. Because types have contexts, all of the constant subclasses could be friended to

I have data that looks like this: start end value 1 4 2 5 8 1 9 10 0 I want to transform the data so that it becomes: startend value 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 0 10 0 ---- I've

On Wed, 10 Jul 2024 17:34:01 +0000 Eric Gurevitz via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hi All, > > Our DNS admins are complaining about a massive number of DNS queries > to : > > SRV? _kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.DOMAIN,COM. There is a possibility that you may have shot yourself in the foot. Is 'DOMAIN.COM' your companies dns domain ? Or is actually

Hi All, Our DNS admins are complaining about a massive number of DNS queries to : SRV? _kerberos._tcp.dc._msdcs.DOMAIN,COM. This is happening on thousands of systems. I see that every time the query is done, winbind updates /var/run/samba/smb_krb5/krb5.conf.DOMAIN (Ubuntu location). I found adding "create krb5 conf = no" stops the DNS queries and the updates to the krb5.conf.DOMAIN

Hi How do I concatenate two lists element-by-element? Example: list.1 <- list(temperature=c("hot","cold") , size=c("big","medium")) list.2 <- list(temperature=c("lukewarm") , size=c("massive","tiny")) list.wanted <- list(temperature=c("hot","cold","lukewarm") ,

Hi all, Due to a security breach at my office recently, we need to log successful / failed log-ins.? I've put in "log level = 3" in smb.conf on our active directory domain controller which seems to log what we need, however this is generating massive log files, due to it logging every file opening/closing by all users.? How do I log successful/failed log-ins without having to

Jeff Cohen wrote: > Jeff Cohen wrote: > >> Bill Wendling wrote: >> >> >>>> I'll ping the guy who's in charge of the sync and ask him when it's >>>> done. Right now, the copy to the Apple internal mirror is done at 2AM >>>> PDT. From your email, I suspect that the sync is done around 3ish. >>>> Though

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10179 Summary: massive test failure on OSX 10.8.5 under Homebrew Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy: chdiza at gmail.com

Hi, i got a server that is massivly contacted on the ports 5190, 5150 and 6667. Is there any possibility to stop these requests ? I block everything with my firewall. That are ten thousands of different IP's that try to connect. Thanks and best regards Niels -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

Hi, If I try to transfer about 27.000 small HTML-Files from my Windows-PC to our central SAMBA-Server I'll get massive performance problems. First the performance looks ok but after a time period of 3 minutes it goes slow down - appr. one file per second will be transferred. Has anyone an idea what I can tune to avoid this annoying behaviour. My samba server configuration: - OS: Solaris 8

Hello, I'm (eventually) attempting a singular value decomposition of a 3200 x 527829 matrix in R version 2.10.1. The script is as follows: ###---------Begin Script here-------### library(Matrix) snps <- 527829 ## Number of SNPs N <- 3200 ## Sample size y <- rnorm(N, 100,1) ## simulated phenotype system.time( ## read in matrix

I'm trying to ... yum groupinstall "Development Tools" on a reasonably current 5.5 system and getting massive mirror failures... is there a problem, or is this my employer's network messing up? (45/74): rpm-build-4.4.2.3-20.el5_5.1.i386.rpm | 302 kB 00:03

Jeff Cohen wrote: > Bill Wendling wrote: > >>> I'll ping the guy who's in charge of the sync and ask him when it's >>> done. Right now, the copy to the Apple internal mirror is done at 2AM >>> PDT. From your email, I suspect that the sync is done around 3ish. >>> Though maybe it's somehow dependent upon when I update the mirror??

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ******************************************************************** The contents of this email are intended exclusively for the addressee. If you are not the addressee you must not read use or disclose the email contents ; you should notify us immediately [ by clicking "Reply" ] and delete this email. Nationwide monitors e-mails to ensure its systems

'doveadm move' might help here? Aki On 20.04.2018 03:18, David Mehler wrote: > Hello, > > I've got dovecot 2.3 going and a mailbox with a lot of system messages > in it. What I'm wanting to do is massively move them to another > mailbox. Is this doable with sieve? > > Thanks. > Dave.

Hi, I''m trying to get Xen running on 2 different systems and have massive packet losts independ from the system I use! This are the results from an UDP-Benchmark-Test from an Xen-Server to another one. As you make notice, the sending packets have a lost rate from &gt; 80% up to 99%. What the hell is going on? I have no ideas. If I boot my 2 Xen-Servers with the normal kernel (without

Sorry for repost, there was an sending error with my first posting. ------------------------------------------------------------------- Hi, I''m trying to get Xen running on 2 different systems and have massive packet losts independ from the system I use! This are the results from an UDP-Benchmark-Test from an Xen-Server to another one. As you make notice, the sending packets have a