search for: masque

...networt working: i''ve have an ethernet card with static IP: 172.20.2.160 gateway: 172.20.2.1 uname -r :2.6.18-xen without xen, the network works fine. here''s my output: eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:0F:FE:6B:57:32 inet adr:172.20.2.160 Bcast:172.20.2.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::20f:feff:fe6b:5732/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:2 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:32 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmis...

...?ll submit patches for this. The inline assembly parts of my aarch64 patch set can thus be considered withdrawn. I haven?t yet tried replacing SIG2WORD16 (or silk_ADD_SAT32/silk_SUB_SAT32) with Neon intrinsics. That?s an obvious next step. On Nov 13, 2015, at 2:47 PM, John Ridges <jridges at masque.com<mailto:jridges at masque.com>> wrote: Thanks, I look forward to seeing what you find out. BTW, I was wondering if you tried replacing the SIG2WORD16 macro using the vqmovns_s32 intrinsic? I'm sure it would be faster than the C code, but in the grand scheme of things it might not m...

...d replacing the SIG2WORD16 macro using the vqmovns_s32 intrinsic? I'm sure it would be faster than the C code, but in the grand scheme of things it might not make much difference. On 11/13/2015 12:15 PM, Jonathan Lennox wrote: >> On Nov 13, 2015, at 1:51 PM, John Ridges <jridges at masque.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> I'm sorry to bring this up again, and I don't want to beat a dead horse, but I was very surprised by your benchmarks so I took a little closer look. >> >> I think what's happening is that it's a little unfai...

Hi, I just installed Ubuntu 12.04.4. I installed R by following instructions from CRAN after modification into my /etc/apt/sources.list file sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install r-base sudo apt-get install r-base-dev When I try to load library(gdata) ou library(gplots), I have error message : library(gdata) gdata: read.xls support for 'XLS' (Excel 97-2004) files

...x tells me that the decoder is always 5 ms, but it says that the encoder is 5 ms for NB, 8.9375 ms for WB, and 10.90625 ms for UWB. Is there an extra frame of delay in the encoder that isn't otherwise accounted for? John Ridges Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > Quoting John Ridges <jridges at masque.com>: > >> I also need to know the precise delays from Speex but I used the >> SPEEX_GET_LOOKAHEAD control requests to determine them (plus the >> "speex_resampler_get_output_latency" function from the resampler). The >> returned values from the Speex look...

...erruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 lg file transmission:1000 > RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:0 (0.0 B) > Interruption:17 > > lo Link encap:Boucle locale > inet adr:127.0.0.1 Masque:255.0.0.0 > adr inet6: ::1/128 Scope:H?te > UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 > RX packets:21802 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 > TX packets:21802 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 > collisions:0 lg file transmission:0...

...//10.8.0.1 Error connecting to 10.8.0.1 (Connexion refus?e) Connection to 10.8.0.1 failed But if I use : *bind interfaces only = no*, then connexion works.... me:~# ifconfig [...] eth1 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:E0:4C:EA:06:02 inet adr:192.168.10.254 Bcast:192.168.10.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::2e0:4cff:feea:602/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:326149 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:378521 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file...

...2. I read some messages about similar problems but found no solution. Some help would be really appreciated Thanks a lot Some data ifconfig before xend start ---------------------------- eth0 Lien encap:Ethernet HWaddr FE:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF inet adr:192.168.0.250 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::fcff:ffff:feff:ffff/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 Packets reçus:32 erreurs:0 :0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:50 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file transmiss...

On Nov 23, 2015, at 12:04 PM, John Ridges <jridges at masque.com<mailto:jridges at masque.com>> wrote: Hi Jonathan. I really, really hate to bring this up this late in the game, but I just noticed that your NEON code doesn't use any of the "high" intrinsics for ARM64, e.g. instead of: int32x4_t coef1 = vmovl_s16(vget_high_s16(coef16...

...> Xen and the Art of Consolidation Nevertheless, I can''t get through my troubles. Here''s the result of the ifconfig command when everything is started : DomUs + Dom0 eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:21:85:32:CA:8E inet adr:172.20.25.2 Bcast:172.20.25.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::221:85ff:fe32:ca8e/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:88446 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:2906 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file tr...

...'ll stop talking now. I'm not saying that the inline assembly isn't faster, but I don't think it's giving you as much of a gain over C as you think. --John Ridges On 11/13/2015 9:30 AM, Jonathan Lennox wrote: >> On Nov 12, 2015, at 12:23 PM, John Ridges <jridges at masque.com> wrote: >> >> One other minor thing: I notice that in the inline assembly the result (rd) is constrained as an earlyclobber operand. What was the reason for that? > Possibly an error? Probably from modeling it on macros_armv4.h, which I guess does require earlyclobber. I?ll...

...oks odd without your values (or the doc) because hypergeom_gain() > should really approach 1 as x goes to infinity. But in the end, an > approximation is probably OK because denoising is anything but an exact science > :-) > > Jean-Marc > > Quoting John Ridges <jridges at masque.com>: > > >> By my reckoning the confluent hypergoemetric functions should have the >> following values: >> >> M(-.25;1;-.5) = 1.11433 >> M(-.25;1;-1) = 1.21088 >> M(-.25;1;-1.5) = 1.29385 >> M(-.25;1;-2) = 1.36627 >> M(-.25;1;-2.5) = 1.43...

...see does not match the definition? > y = gamma(1.25)^2 * M(-.25;1;-x) / sqrt(x) > Note that the table data has an interval of .5 for the x axis. > > How far are your results from the data in the table? > > Cheers, > > Jean-Marc > > Quoting John Ridges <jridges at masque.com>: > > >> Thanks for the confirmation Jean-Marc. I kind of suspected from the >> comments that it was the confluent hypergoemetric function, which I was >> trying to evaluate using Kummer's equation, namely: >> >> M(a;b;x) is the sum from n=0 to inf...

> On Nov 19, 2015, at 5:47 PM, John Ridges <jridges at masque.com> wrote: > > Any speedup from the intrinsics may just be swamped by the rest of the encode/decode process. But I think you really want SIG2WORD16 to be (vqmovns_s32(PSHR32((x), SIG_SHIFT))) Yes, you?re right. I forgot to run the vectors under qemu with my previous version (oh, the emb...

...interfaces eth0 8000.0018714d1764 no peth0 ************************************************************************ ************ Command "ifconfig" : eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:18:71:4d:17:64 inet adr:192.0.1.5 Bcast:192.0.1.255 Masque:255.255.255.0 adr inet6: fe80::218:71ff:fe4d:1764/64 Scope:Lien UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:23150 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:4562 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 lg file tr...

Quoting John Ridges <jridges at masque.com>: > Speex tells me that the decoder is always 5 ms, but it says that the > encoder is 5 ms for NB, 8.9375 ms for WB, and 10.90625 ms for UWB. Is > there an extra frame of delay in the encoder that isn't otherwise > accounted for? Oh, delay = frame_size + lookahead If you h...

Nit: in dual_inner_prod_sse, why not do both horizontal sums at the same time? As in: xsum1 = _mm_add_ps(_mm_movelh_ps(xsum1, xsum2), _mm_movehl_ps(xsum2, xsum1)); xsum1 = _mm_add_ps(xsum1, _mm_shuffle_ps(xsum1, xsum1, 0xf5)); _mm_store_ss(xy1, xsum1); _mm_store_ss(xy2, _mm_movehl_ps(xsum1, xsum1)); --John

...e machines, and?AEC worked again. But this solution wasn?t practical (user?must install a special driver) so?i can?t say if?this method will work or not on *every* machine.? I think it will not work on Vista, no mather what card you use. Just my 2c. --- El mar, 7/7/09, John Ridges <jridges at masque.com> escribi?: De: John Ridges <jridges at masque.com> Asunto: Re: [Speex-dev] AEC with different soundcards Para: "Alexander Chemeris" <Alexander.Chemeris at sipez.com> CC: "speex-dev at xiph.org" <speex-dev at xiph.org> Fecha: martes, 7 julio, 2009 9:36...

One other minor thing: I notice that in the inline assembly the result (rd) is constrained as an earlyclobber operand. What was the reason for that?

Something looks odd without your values (or the doc) because hypergeom_gain() should really approach 1 as x goes to infinity. But in the end, an approximation is probably OK because denoising is anything but an exact science :-) Jean-Marc Quoting John Ridges <jridges at masque.com>: > By my reckoning the confluent hypergoemetric functions should have the > following values: > > M(-.25;1;-.5) = 1.11433 > M(-.25;1;-1) = 1.21088 > M(-.25;1;-1.5) = 1.29385 > M(-.25;1;-2) = 1.36627 > M(-.25;1;-2.5) = 1.43038 > M(-.25;1;-3) = 1.48784 > M(-.25;...