search for: masociete

..._ACCESS WRITE_DAC_ACCESS READ_CONTROL_ACCESS DELETE_ACCESS SID: S-1-1-0 cannot add share: WERR_ACCESS_DENIED Here my samba configuration file and ldap structure : smb.conf [global] passdb backend = ldapsam:ldap://localhost, guest ldap admin dn = "cn=Manager,dc=masociete,dc=fr" ldap ssl = off ldap delete dn = no ldap user suffix = ou=Users ldap machine suffix = ou=Machines ldap group suffix = ou=Groups ldap suffix = dc=masociete,dc=fr workgroup = masociete netbios name = SAMBAMIGR encrypt...

...ote: > >> Hello, I realize the preparation of the migration from samba 3 to >> samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. >> >> I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode >> (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the >> same DNS domain name. > Even then, a dot in a workgroup name wasn't recommended. That's what I notice from reading but there are 10 I was a beginner ;) > >> With the migration the domain dns becomes "dom" >> and according to my first researches...

Hello, I realize the preparation of the migration from samba 3 to samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the same DNS domain name. With the migration the domain dns becomes "dom" and according to my first researches I will quickly encounter problems if I need subdomain in the future. The ideal would be that I rename my domain in mycompany.local knowing that our Internet domain name i...

...ize the preparation of the migration from samba 3 to >>>> samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. >>>> >>>> I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode >>>> (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the >>>> same DNS domain name. >>> Even then, a dot in a workgroup name wasn't recommended. >> That's what I notice from reading but there are 10 I was a beginner ;) >>>> With the migration the domain dns becomes "dom" >>>> an...

...ello, I realize the preparation of the migration from samba 3 to > >> samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. > >> > >> I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode > >> (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the > >> same DNS domain name. > > Even then, a dot in a workgroup name wasn't recommended. > > That's what I notice from reading but there are 10 I was a beginner ;) > > > >> With the migration the domain dns becomes "dom" > >> an...

...ion from samba 3 to > > > > > samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. > > > > > > > > > > I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode > > > > > (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the > > > > > same DNS domain name. > > > > > > > > Even then, a dot in a workgroup name wasn't recommended. > > > > > > That's what I notice from reading but there are 10 I was a beginner ;) > > > > > With the mi...

...tion from samba 3 to >>>>>> samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. >>>>>> >>>>>> I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode >>>>>> (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the >>>>>> same DNS domain name. >>>>> Even then, a dot in a workgroup name wasn't recommended. >>>> That's what I notice from reading but there are 10 I was a beginner ;) >>>>>> With the migration the domain dns becomes &qu...

...lists.samba.org> wrote: > Hello, I realize the preparation of the migration from samba 3 to > samba 4. For the moment the test platform is functional at 80%. > > I realize a problem. At the implementation of samba 3 in NT mode > (more than 10 years ago) I chose netbios name dom.masociete and the > same DNS domain name. Even then, a dot in a workgroup name wasn't recommended. >With the migration the domain dns becomes "dom" > and according to my first researches I will quickly encounter > problems if I need subdomain in the future. The ideal would be tha...