search for: masking

Please tell me whether the following implementation is correct..... My target supports 64 bit mask means immediate(0-2^63) I have implemented it but i dont know whether its correct or not. Please see the changes below that i have made in x86isellowering.cpp static SDValue lower2048BitVectorShuffle(const SDLoc &DL, ArrayRef<int> Mask, MVT VT,

If I have data that I feed into shapio.test and jarque.bera.test yet they seem to disagree. What do I use for a decision? For my data set I have p.value of 0.05496421 returned from the shapiro.test and 0.882027 returned from the jarque.bera.test. I have included the data set below. Thank you. Kevin "Category","Period","Residual" "CHILD HATS, WIGS &

libswfdec/swfdec_movie.c | 4 + libswfdec/swfdec_sprite_movie_as.c | 7 ++ test/image/Makefile.am | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++ test/image/clip-change-backward-5.swf |binary test/image/clip-change-backward-5.swf.png |binary test/image/clip-change-backward-6.swf |binary

I have a logon script for windows clients to preform net time w/my samba server when they logon. The script is called gerry.bat and it is located in the logon directory. But, when any user logs on.... The script is never called. I've attached my smb.conf file. (by the way Im running RH6.0 on an AMD K-7 w/Samba 2.0.5a. THANKS IN ADVANCE!!!! # Samba config file created using SWAT # from

I'm doing some string manipulation on a vector of file names, and noticed something curious. When I strsplit the vector, I get a list of character vectors. The list is numbered, as lists are. When I cast that list as a data frame with 'as.data.frame()', the resulting columns have names derived from the original filenames. Example code is below. My question is, where are these names

...e can then concentrate on optimizing VP intrinsic code and all targets benefit. - Simon *: VE's packed mode (512 x 32bit elements) is a use case for a non-trivial setting of %mask and %evl at the same time (%evl for packs of two 32bit elements (ie %evl must be even for 32bit lanes), %mask for masking out inside packages). Thoughts? Kind regards, -- Roger Ferrer Ibáñez -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201106/72ccfa58/attachment-0001.html>

I am still fighting with this issue. I did the following: I connected to the NAS with a read-only account called kodi. I traversed various folders and I finally opened an image. Everything went fine. Looking at the logs, the get_entry mask file only shows the final folder: smbd_dirptr_get_entry mask=[Anhelina Viber] found Users/luca/Pictures/Canon/Alessandro/Amici/Anhelina Viber fname=Anhelina

...thin tc. But alas, I am having an issue I know I should not be having. I am trying to filter all IRC traffic on my network so that it neither consumes large amounts of band width nor gets to little band width. I originally wanted to filter just ports 6660-6669 but quickly realized that the bit masking wouldn''t allow for a single rule to cover them, so I opted instead to filter ports 6656-66671 which would give me the use of all 4 bits in that range. For reference, 6656 = 0x1a00, 6671 = 0x1a0f. As such, I have the following rules in my setup: eth0 egress to the internet (eth0 is the...

Dear Sirs, we're having some inconviniences on files used in a private system, developed to "suit" the company. this system's files are located in /var/wsystems and permissions are granted 4777 acordingly to all files. When we start up and work in this system with ONE user alone, we have no problems whatsoever... however when we start up the whole intranet in this system, most

Dear Sirs, we're having some inconviniences on files used in a private system, developed to "suit" the company. this system's files are located in /var/wsystems and permissions are granted 4777 acordingly to all files. When we start up and work in this system with ONE user alone, we have no problems whatsoever... however when we start up the whole intranet in this system, most

Information for this was gathered from nvdisasm. Signed-off-by: Ilia Mirkin <imirkin at alum.mit.edu> --- Entirely untested. Ben, do you think you'll be able to give this a shot? .../drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_gk110.cpp | 33 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/gallium/drivers/nouveau/codegen/nv50_ir_emit_gk110.cpp

...e can then concentrate on optimizing VP intrinsic code and all targets benefit. - Simon *: VE's packed mode (512 x 32bit elements) is a use case for a non-trivial setting of %mask and %evl at the same time (%evl for packs of two 32bit elements (ie %evl must be even for 32bit lanes), %mask for masking out inside packages). Thoughts? Kind regards, -- Roger Ferrer Ibáñez -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201106/72f6e006/attachment-0001.html>

This is a new one to me... Drivers install fine, but on some of the printers I get the "test page failed to print" message. I'm getting nothing in the samba logs from the workstation, smbd, nor from the cups logs. I've googled myself silly, but can only find other people asking the same or similar question. Some of them have found permissions to be the problem, but in

Adam Nemet via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> writes: > I spent some time chatting with Adam about this and have a better > understanding of his concerns here. It seems to me that if having > masking intrinsics is the long-term solution we want, we should do > that now (for add and sub) rather than building arbitrary matrix > layout info into intrinsics, since a mask has all the information > that we actually need. > > I think that sounds like a reasonable compromise....

All, Looking for some help here. Not finding anything on the net that looks the same as what I'm seeing. Running Solaris 10 Sparc, on a Sunfire 5220, 16Gb of RAM. Samba version 3.4.5 and using ZFS file systems with user quotas. All cifs clients shares to this server freeze after about 10 to 15 minutes of connectivity. Only fix is to restart samba. I'm not getting any errors

hi guys my samba share has inherit acls = Yes and inherits(I guess) from global: create mask = 0744 directory mask = 0755 Now, share's underlying filesystem has acls set on a folder: user::rwx user:me:rwx user:appmgr:r-x group::--- mask::rwx other::--- default:user::rwx default:user:me:rwx default:user:appmgr:r-x default:group::--- default:mask::rwx default:other::--- In shell when I

Introduction ========== We would like to add support for masked vector signed/unsigned integer division and remainder in the LLVM IR by introducing new target-independent intrinsics. This follows similar work which was done already for masked vector loads and stores - http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2014-October/078059.html. Another relevant reference is the masked scatter/gather

Here are some ideas that came out of brainstorming during and after the dev meeting. Disclaimer: they're just ideas :-). * Vector Gather/Scatter One way to do gather/scatter would be to extend vector types to support pointer element types, and extend load, store, and getelementptr to operate on vectors of pointers. A typical gather sequence would then look like this: %vi = load <2 x

...e can then concentrate on optimizing VP intrinsic code and all targets benefit. - Simon *: VE's packed mode (512 x 32bit elements) is a use case for a non-trivial setting of %mask and %evl at the same time (%evl for packs of two 32bit elements (ie %evl must be even for 32bit lanes), %mask for masking out inside packages). Thoughts? Kind regards, -- Roger Ferrer Ibáñez -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201109/cb4c9986/attachment.html>

On Tue, August 5, 2008 8:32 am, David Greene wrote: > On Monday 04 August 2008 17:56, Dan Gohman wrote: >> The applymask approach leverages use-def information rather than >> what can be thought of as duplicating a subset of it, making the IR > > I don't understand what you mean by "duplicating" here. If you look just at the case where every instruction in a