Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "maschek".
Did you mean:
machek
2015 Apr 27
2
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
<m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote:
> Ah. I don't remember if I was using csh, or ksh, and didn't realize about
> bash. I *think* I vaguely remember that sh seemed to be more capable than
> I remembered.
If you like to check what the Bourne Shell did support in the late 1980s, I
recommend you to fetch recent Schily tools from:
2015 Apr 27
4
Real sh? Or other efficient shell for non-interactive scripts
...dy wrote up the differences between osh and bosh in an earlier post. Is there a good reason why these comparisons are not on the Schily Tools web page already? :)
The schily tools act as a container to publish the current code state. There is
no such maintained web page. Given the fact that Sven Maschek wrote down a lot,
it seems the information is still here.
I would be interested to understand why Heirloom seems to so well known and my
portability attempts seem to be widely unknown.
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.net (home) J?rg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
joerg.schi...