Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "mascasa".
Did you mean:
mascara
2018 Jul 06
1
Using -runs consistently in libFuzzer tests
This sounds reasonable to me. Some tests could probably use a seed as well.
On Thu, Jul 5, 2018 at 3:55 PM George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com>
wrote:
> Timeouts when running tests are annoying,
> but for many libFuzzer tests lacking -runs argument that’s an expected
> failure mode.
> Should we go through all the tests making sure that -runs is supplied?
>
>
2019 Jan 04
2
[Fuzzer] Test failure on Linux x86-64
Continuing my quixotic effort to get 'check-all' clean, I am seeing a
Fuzzer failure on x86-64 Linux. Do any builders run fuzzer tests?
FAIL: libFuzzer :: value-profile-mem.test (103 of 103)
******************** TEST 'libFuzzer :: value-profile-mem.test' FAILED ********************
Script:
--
: 'RUN: at line 4'; /build/x86_64/./bin/clang --driver-mode=g++ -std=c++11
2019 Jan 04
2
[Fuzzer] Test failure on Linux x86-64
FWIW I think that one was always flaky.
> On Jan 4, 2019, at 2:53 PM, Kostya Serebryany via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> +Matt Morehouse <mailto:mascasa at google.com>
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 11:43 AM David Greene via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org <mailto:llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org>> wrote:
> Continuing my quixotic effort to get 'check-all' clean, I am seeing a
> Fuzzer failure on x86-64 Linux. Do any...
2018 Jul 05
2
Using -runs consistently in libFuzzer tests
Timeouts when running tests are annoying,
but for many libFuzzer tests lacking -runs argument that’s an expected failure mode.
Should we go through all the tests making sure that -runs is supplied?
Motivation: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38034
2017 Aug 24
3
Building LLVM's fuzzers
George Karpenkov <ekarpenkov at apple.com> writes:
> Should -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER be also specified?
CMake is smart enough to infer that from C_COMPILER:
% grep CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER CMakeCache.txt
CMAKE_CXX_COMPILER:FILEPATH=/Users/bogner/llvm-lkgc/bin/clang++
>> On Aug 24, 2017, at 11:29 AM, Justin Bogner <mail at justinbogner.com> wrote:
>>
>> (kcc, george:
2018 Aug 15
3
How is llvm-opt-fuzzer supposed to be built and used with a pass pipeline?
Hello List,
I'm currently writing my own little optimization pass (on LLVM 6.0) and
considered it a neat idea to fuzz it using llvm-opt-fuzzer, which in
theory should be a ready-made tool for such jobs as far as I can tell,
potentially helping me to find UB and Address issues in my pass.
So I went ahead and followed the instructions in the build manual [1] to
build LLVM's llvm-opt-fuzzer