search for: maroh

Hi, http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8453 http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8371 http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-3227 I came across the above by accident. While I am subscribed to the so called rails security list where supposed announcement of security issues were to be posted, neither of the above problem made the list. While I use rails a lot and like it, the above

A Rails 2.3.9 app with Active Record or Memcache session store will never send the session ID cookie to a client if the client doesn''t send any HTTP cookies in its requests. Rails integration tests didn''t catch this because they always send the HTTP_COOKIE header, even if it''s empty. This is a huge bug, as it can break keeping sessions on sites which don''t set

Hi, I just put in a patch that allows you to DRY up this: <%= link_to @company.name, @company %> to this: <%= link_to :name, @company %> The symbol indicates the method to be called on the object passed in the link_to options. http://dev.rubyonrails.org/ticket/8789 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Hello, I wish to route a sinatra application in my Rails 3 app. As said by Yehuda, it should be possible. http://yehudakatz.com/2009/12/26/the-rails-3-router-rack-it-up/ However I see the route isn''t recognized and I get ActionController::RoutingError problems. It works well with simple rack apps however (the test in actionpack with a lambda passes well). I''ve written a test

As it currently stands, ActiveRecord has alot of private and protected methods in the Base class. >> ActiveRecord::Base.methods.size => 427 >> ActiveRecord::Base.protected_methods.size => 32 >> ActiveRecord::Base.private_methods.size => 193 I really loved the suggestion by Courtenay in Refactoring AR::Base.find (http://groups.google.com/group/rubyonrails-core/

According to "Ruby On Rails", the layout call is suppose to be inherited: (page 508) "Subclasses of a controller will use the parent''s layout unless they override it using the layout directive" I have a case where this is not working. I have not spent time to concoct a stand alone test. I wanted to verify that David''s book is correct first. Can someone

class User end class Agent < User end script/console production User.find_by_name ''john'' SELECT "people".* FROM "people" WHERE ((("people"."type" = ''User'' OR "people"."type" = ''Manager'') OR "people"."type" = ''Agent'')) AND

In Rails 3.0 (both RC and edge), any constant that''s defined while loading a file in development mode will get unloaded on each request, regardless of whether it comes from an autoload path in the application or from external code such as a gem. Example file (tested on a fresh edge app): # kittens.rb require ''nibbler/json'' # "nibbler" is a gem specified

Hello, I posted this on the rails talk group but received no response. Perhaps someone on this list could weigh in on whether this is expected/desired behavior or a bug that I should file and develop failing tests for (I doubt I have the active record method_missing fu to actually patch it). Test Scenario: I would like to find or initialize a new user and base the find on the users email

Yesterday I answered a question regarding polymorphic URL helpers on Core ML and noticed that the module has no documentation. I''ve documented it and rewritten unit tests using Mocha. I also optimized some of the code slightly (nothing major, though). The patch also includes two fixes by Geoff Buesing, who has done awesome work in this area in the past.