search for: marlier

...the only changes are the names of the SSL certificates and the name of the dovecot user. What I can't figure out is, why is the ordering of the mailboxes different? This is the Maildir directory list: [network:/Users/foc/Maildir] root# ls -al /Network/Servers/network.uphamscornercs.net/Users/marlier/Maildir/ total 816 drwxrw---- 22 marlier staff 748 Oct 13 19:52 . drwxr-xr-x 64 marlier staff 2176 Oct 10 14:08 .. drwxrw---- 13 marlier staff 442 Oct 13 19:14 .Deleted Items drwxrwxr-x 9 marlier staff 306 Oct 13 19:14 .Dovecot drwxrw---- 12 marlier staff 408...

...as part of this whole process), I put the Maildir folders under user home dirs -- and the home dirs are mounted via NFS from a server. This is for reasons of space as well as simply seeming to make sense. Now I get errors in my mail.log which read: imap-login: Sep 16 00:16:24 dovecot:Info: Login: marlier [209.6.159.188] imap(marlier): Sep 16 00:16:28 dovecot:Error: file_wait_lock() failed with index file /Network/Servers/network.uphamscornercs.net/Users/marlier/Maildir/.INBOX/.im ap.index: Invalid argument It looks to me like it's a file locking problem...any thoughts on how to get around it...

On 06/21/2010 08:21 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > > >> Hello, >> >> This bug affects all LLVM versions from 2.6 to trunk : >> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5081 >> >> The workaround I found is to add this : >> >> Index: lib/Target/X86/X86Instr64bit.td >> ==============...

On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > Which one is correct ? > - movl $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx > or > - movq $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %rcx > or > - movl tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx > I believe this is initial exec and so from: http://people.redhat.com/drepper/tls.pdf it would be movl tm...

Hi, I am trying to modify visitStoreInst() function in Execution.cpp of LLVM 2.7 to do some extra things. How I can determine whether the stored variable is global or local for some function? Regards, Nayden -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100806/fba58a79/attachment.html>

On 06/22/2010 11:11 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > On 06/21/2010 08:21 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: >> On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: >> >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> This bug affects all LLVM versions from 2.6 to trunk : >>> http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5...

...f : Pat<(i64 (X86Wrapper tblockaddress:$dst)), Unfortunately, I am 100% confident with this modification since I am not an expert of LLVM and I doubt a bit about the conversion for 32 bit to 64bit. If someone could approve it or help me with this bug it will be wonderful. Thank you, Patrick Marlier. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20100621/63a62c0a/attachment.html>

I would like to know something different than that. How I can determine if the address at which data is stored is part of the heap or part of the stack. Regards, Nayden On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 3:22 AM, Patrick Marlier <patrick.marlier at unine.ch>wrote: > >> On 08/07/2010 04:41 AM, Nayden Nedev wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am trying to modify visitStoreInst() function in Execution.cpp of LLVM >>> 2.7 to do some extra things. How I can determine whether the...

On Jul 7, 2010, at 11:20 AM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > >> Which one is correct ? >> - movl $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx >> or >> - movq $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %rcx >> or >> - movl tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx >> > > I believe this is initial exec and so from: > > http://p...

On Jun 21, 2010, at 2:56 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > Hello, > > This bug affects all LLVM versions from 2.6 to trunk : > http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=5081 > > The workaround I found is to add this : > > Index: lib/Target/X86/X86Instr64bit.td > ============================================================...

On 07/07/2010 08:20 PM, Eric Christopher wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2010, at 4:52 AM, Patrick Marlier wrote: > >> Which one is correct ? >> - movl $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx >> or >> - movq $tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %rcx >> or >> - movl tm_nest_level at TPOFF, %ecx >> > > I believe this is initial exec and so from: > > http://peopl...

Hi, all -- I''m in the process of configuring a new machine for use as a Xen server, and am having some rather significant stability issues. The hardware/distro/kernel info is: opensuse 10.3 Linux offxen2 2.6.22.5-31-xen #1 SMP 2007/09/21 22:29:00 UTC x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux 2 x Dual-Core AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 2212 HE 8 x 2GB PC2-5300 RAM Xen 3.1.0_15042-51 I currently have

...up clean. Based on my reading, it looks like the "on_poweroff" and similar commands only apply to a controlled shutdown of the domU, not to a shutdown of the dom0, so that doesn''t help much. Xen version is 3.0.3, running on CentOS 5.6. Any help is appreciated! - Ian -- Ian Marlier | Systems Engineer Brightcove, Inc. One Cambridge Center, 12th Floor, Cambridge, MA 02142 imarlier@brightcove.com _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xensource.com http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users

...e mailbox access: "ERROR : Could not complete request. Query: <imap query string> Reason Given: Internal error [<datestamp>]" In both cases (Entourage and Squirrelmail), the Internal Error is accompanied by the following error message in the /var/log/mail.log file: "imap(marlier): Sep 16 08:40:45 dovecot:Error: /Network/Servers/network.uphamscornercs.net/Users/marlier/Maildir/.subscript ions failed with subscription file file_wait_lock(): Invalid argument" So, it looks to me like something isn't working with locking. I'm not sure whether the problem is with...

Cross-posting scares me, but... Have you looked at the latest RPMs for SuSE, from ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/projects/samba/ ? They've worked like a charm for me, thus far (revision after revision, a simple rpm -U * seems to work...) -----Original Message----- From: david rankin [mailto:drankin@cox-internet.com] Sent: Mon 9/12/2005 5:30 PM To: samba; Suse Linux Subject: [SLE] SuSE 9.3 and