search for: marky

Hello, On 1/20/2024 1:03 AM, Adan Calderon wrote: > Remember the vmware versions of their loader are diffrent. Phew, what does that mean? It's their "bootx64.efi". Running "file" on it says it's an "MS-DOS executable". > I remember looking at the source for the mboot file and it was > diffrent from the syslinux version. Not sure what this means

On 1/20/2024 1:29 AM, Ralph Ronnquist via Syslinux wrote: > On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:21:37AM +0100, marki via Syslinux wrote: >> Hello, >> >> So I'm running syslinux.efi >> Which loads menu.c32 >> Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi >> >> But that gives >> >> """ >> Loading mboot.efi... ok

Remember the vmware versions of their loader are diffrent. I remember looking at the source for the mboot file and it was diffrent from the syslinux version. On Fri, Jan 19, 2024, 5:25 PM marki via Syslinux <syslinux at syslinux.org> wrote: > Hello, > > So I'm running syslinux.efi > Which loads menu.c32 > Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi >

Hello, So I'm running syslinux.efi Which loads menu.c32 Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi But that gives """ Loading mboot.efi... ok Invalid Boot signature 0x2, bailing out Booting kernel failed: Bad file number """ Secure boot is disabled. Thoughts? The reason why it would be nice using PXE and syslinux here is because we have

On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 12:21:37AM +0100, marki via Syslinux wrote: > Hello, > > So I'm running syslinux.efi > Which loads menu.c32 > Which is supposed to start ESXi's bootx64.efi/mboot.efi > > But that gives > > """ > Loading mboot.efi... ok > Invalid Boot signature 0x2, bailing out > Booting kernel failed: Bad file number >

...any tools in CenOs which comes default in it? And how do I do apache load balancing? should I rely on apache forums or mailing list or is there any way or tool I can use in CentOS? Can any throw some vague Idea on how to do it so that I start reading documents before I do it? Thanks and regards Marky -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090210/bb973149/attachment.html>

Hi, I installed ffmpeg using yum, and then tried to convert a asx video to flv it says unable to find encoder x264, eventhough it is installed and I am able to view it when I check ffmpeg --help.Can anyone tell me how to fix this issue? Thanks and Regards Marky -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/attachments/20090103/0f8541ab/attachment-0004.html>

It is mostly the Sober.Q worm, a new Sober variant that has come out that is causing all of the trouble. Been getting quite a bit at work but it has all been tagged as spam. More info at http://news.com.com/Sober.Q+spreads+hate+messages+in+German,+English/210 0-7349_3-5708588.html > -----Original Message----- > From: samba-bounces+marki=cumcmemphis.org@lists.samba.org >

Subject: Samba takes some time to wake up.... Hi folks, We are using Samba-2.0. with RedHat 5.2 on a PII-350MHz and RAID SCSI HD as a domain-logon-server. The clients are Win 95 Pentium PCs connected by ethernet. The problem is: Samba takes a long time, i.e. 1 min, to let the first user log on in the morning. After that the response times are reasonable.

I have some problem whit Kerberos. OS: FreeBSD 5.3 Domain: W2k3 native mode. 1)I am Installing Heimdal 0.6.1 over port. Config /etc/krb5.conf %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit: krb5_get_init_creds: Response too big for UDP, retry with TCP 2)Compile and install Heimdal 0.6.4 over source %/usr/local/bin/kinit ivan ivan@NKMK.RU's Password: kinit:

Getting this on a FreeBSD 5.2.1-RELEASE #0: Sat Aug 28 11:56:25 CDT 2004 system when trying to start the smbd process after an upgrade to the newest release. Didn't see anything helpful in the referenced appendix bugs of the Samba HOWTO collection. An attempted smbd -d10 yielded a core dump but no futher info. -------------------------------log

...with absolutley no luck. when i try to install the graphics drivers into wine i get problems with windows sp's (i know this a fake windows but they can at least let us off) anyway if anyone out there can help me sort this problem out, it would really be appreciated. thanks to all in advanced marky j

Hi, i'm not subscribed to the list so could you please Cc back to me :) Just discovered this problem today when my brother tried to change his password. Windows sat there and eventually said that my domain couldn't be found or something, this seemed very odd so I had a look in the logs and got this show up... Apr 27 21:21:42 bone smbd[496]: [2003/04/27 21:21:42, 0]

ood Morning Everyone: This question is a bit different from the run of the mill -- HELP ME I GOT TROUBLE questions here on the list, however I am interested in getting this situation working correctly and also need to understand the basis behind the process so that I can implement it properly and extend it as necessary First off -- Some Background I am running a 150 station lan where all the

In a directory with approximately 6000 files, several files are missing on the Windows side. If I check the directory on Unix (AIX) they are all there. As far as I can see there's nothing strange with this files en I can't see any connection between the missing files. It looks like it's randomly. A few examples of missing files: FAKTREF.10062005.16 (See debug information)

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10738 Summary: report --stats output when termination signal arrives Product: rsync Version: 3.0.9 Platform: x64 OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org ReportedBy:

2009/10/15 Farkas Levente <lfarkas at lfarkas.org> > hi, > i read your thread at: > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003772.html > > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/nut-upsdev/2009-January/003775.html > we've got exactly the same problem that we need a nut driver for liebert > ups. is there any progress in this field?

I have some lines outside the USA that I can't get to for up-close testing. The issue is that when I make an outbound call on these lines, I don't get answer indication until 20 seconds into the call. Asterisk always thinks the line is answered, even if it's still ringing or busy. On incoming calls the opposite is true, Asterisk doesn't know the line has been hung up by the

Two asterisk servers, one running a recent HEAD, the other 1.0.9. I have both ends set up with trunk=yes, notransfer=yes, type=friend. I notice that the trunking works from HEAD to 1.0.9 only (the direction in which calls are originated). I know this by bandwidth usage and by iax2 trunk debug. I did have to use trunktimestamps=no on the HEAD end to keep it quiet. I assume this is the new

Has anyone done any installations using the Xorcom TS-1 and multiple T1's? I'm looking for a reliable box to put in a closet and route calls between T1's. No voicemail, IVR, etc. Any other suggestions? Mark Willis Cartama