search for: markups

I''m actually looking to create my own markup language, after a look to the greats markdown and textilize markup languages they seem to be more complexes that what I need, so not feating with my application. Any help is welcome ;-) -- Grosjean S?bastien

This release of libX11 looks bigger than it is, due to a lot of spec/doc cleanup work that doesn't affect the code itself. There is still a good deal of bug fixes, code cleanup, locale improvements, and compose key table additions, including new UTF-8 compose sequences for: <Multi_key> <R> <equal> : "<U+20B9>" U20b9 # INDIAN RUPEE SIGN <Multi_key>

As indicated in some off-list mail by Frank E. Harrell Jr., the announcement of the availability of package %--------------------------------------------- SweaveListingUtils %--------------------------------------------- on CRAN, mingled into mail "New versions for the distr-family of packages" to R-pkgs from 21 Apr 2009, will probably have gone unnoticed by some people who might be

As indicated in some off-list mail by Frank E. Harrell Jr., the announcement of the availability of package %--------------------------------------------- SweaveListingUtils %--------------------------------------------- on CRAN, mingled into mail "New versions for the distr-family of packages" to R-pkgs from 21 Apr 2009, will probably have gone unnoticed by some people who might be

Hi Sean, Thanks for the feedback! Exactly the sort of discussion I was hoping to get started. On Oct 12, 2012, at 10:12 AM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > How is the client supposed to make use of this markup information? Target-independent introspection of the assembly. A simple example is color-coded output in a GUI disassembly display. All registers show up one color,

The following is a brief proposal for annotated assembly (and disassembly) output. Kevin Enderby and I have been discussing this a bit and are interested in getting broader feedback from interested folks. LLVM Rich Assembly Output LLVM's (dis)assembly output is currently very raw. Consumers have limited ability to introspect the instructions' textual representation or to reformat for

On Oct 12, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > Hi Jim, thanks for the response. That pretty much clears up my primary > concern. +1 for keeping the C API small/stable/robust :) > > Having multiple hand-implemented parsers accepting the output, I think > it would be wise to have an official "conformance suite" for the > syntax so that

How is the client supposed to make use of this markup information? At first glance it seems like client code will just devolve into a pile of regex insanity. Why not use an existing standardized markup, like XML (not that I'm that fond of XML)? At a higher level, why not expose an API for iterating over (potentially annotated) tokens which can be programmatically inspected. So what you expose

Hi Jim, thanks for the response. That pretty much clears up my primary concern. +1 for keeping the C API small/stable/robust :) Having multiple hand-implemented parsers accepting the output, I think it would be wise to have an official "conformance suite" for the syntax so that external implementors can sleep more soundly with their implementation; if I were implementing a parser for

Adam Jackson (2): Bug #14029: Don't LockDisplay() recursively. libX11 1.1.4 Alan Coopersmith (6): X.Org Bug #4312: incorrect comment asterisk in XAnyEvent.3x man page XErrorDB updates for Render 0.9 & XFixes 4.0 Add WM_LOCALE_NAME to list of properties set in XSetWMProperties comment Spell out number in XkbGetKeyVirtualModMap man page to avoid cpp

1) Is there a way to strip a redcloth string of all redcloth tags? I need to display a snippet of the text in an index page and want all markings removed. I used RedCloth.new(''a'').methods but didn''t find anything appropriate. For now, I''m converting to html then stripping tags. 2) what''s the best practice in term of storing user''s redcloth-

On 16/01/2008, Ivo Emanuel Gon?alves <justivo@gmail.com> wrote: > > * I agree that CMML is complex for something as simple as karaoke, but I disagree that karaoke is simple; to do karaoke properly is about as complex as text codecs get. I also disagree that CMML is complex, but I may be mistaken. In terms of complexity, I see it as about 10% of the way between using zero-markup and

let's talk about writing tools that use markdown (or more broadly, another form of light-markup)... to begin with, there is the markdown "dingus"... from a demo perspective, it has been _fantastic_. it has provided interested observers a quick idea about the simplicity and the power of markdown. as a writing tool, it's a bit clunky; it will work, yes, but i'd doubt many

ActsAsBlog ========== Here is a simple plugin to allow you to allow the use of RedCloth,BlueCloth, or SmartyPants in your blog. It''s super simple to use. It will take your blog post or comment and transform it into html. This allows you to write in a much simpler syntax and allows your users to post valid html into their comment. It also allows you to block all html tags that

Had a user add our app to a Facebook Page, http://www.facebook.com/business/?pages. Facebook Pages act like users but are more for businesses and Bands. It looks like the current Facebooker API doesn''t currently support setting the Profile FBML for a Page. The current code for setting the proflie is this: def profile_fbml=(markup)

Another question: What kind of documentation you are planning to produce for this feature? -- Sean Silva On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 12, 2012, at 1:07 PM, Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> wrote: > >> Hi Jim, thanks for the response. That pretty much clears up my primary >> concern. +1 for keeping the C

the app i am currently working on has a set of static documents/articles that users can select.. alot of these are documents that have links to articles on other sites, etc.. and are edited fairly regularly by the site administrators.. all the admins are totally down with wiki markup, and i think it makes sense to store that info in wiki format, so they can edit it easily.. my question is..

alan said: > I think I am in agreement, > if by "isn't necessary" you mean to say that > simply providing more features to Markdown > doesn't force end users to use them, > or even really know they exist. except that wasn't what i meant. i mean that it's not necessary to trade simplicity in order to get the power of additional

Hi, THis may be a simple question. I am trying to hide some HTML markup language depending on a value. So for example I have the following in an RHTML file: <%if session[:role]=="Administrator" %> <label><Strong>Administration</strong></label><br> <%= link_to("Users", :controller=>"Users",:action=>"list")

Hi Facebookers, Is there a helper or suggested approach for presenting validation errors on an fbml form? Something to translate rails error markup to fbml:error markup? thanks Joel