search for: marked

I've just upgraded from Slackware 14.1 to 14.2. I've not done anything with dovecot -- it's the same version that was running before the upgrade. However, now I'm getting a permission error: /var/log/maillog: Jan 16 13:09:44 mail dovecot: imap(mark): Error: opendir(/home/HPRS/mark/Maildir) failed: Permission denied (euid=3000026(HPRS\mark) egid=100(users) missing +r perm:

Hi, I have a suspicious problem with multiple uplinks configuration. First of all my configuration: 1) kernel 2.6.20.3 2) iptables 1.3.7 3) last iproute (for masked marks) All wan interfaces are bridged (stp disabled) in only one interface (wan0), all lan interfaces are bridged (stp enabled) in only one interface (zlan0). The wan0 bridge is to allow UPnP works. To allow related

Jan 16 13:09:44 mail dovecot: imap(mark): Error: opendir(/home/HPRS/mark/Maildir) failed: Permission denied (euid=3000026(HPRS\mark) egid=100(users) missing +r perm: /home/HPRS/mark/Maildir, conflicting dir uid=10001(HPRS\mark)) Just wanted to point out that you have at different UID for the folder than your EUID (gotten from userdb/passdb). Aki On 16.01.2017 23:09, Mark Foley wrote: > More

...A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p tcp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j CONNMARK --save-mark iptables -t mangle -A DSL-IN -p udp -m ipp2p --ipp2p -j MARK --set-mark 7 by this set of commands, should all p2p packets mark well ? Because very little of them are marked on my server… Chain DSL-IN (1 references) pkts bytes target prot opt in out source destination 13708 2260152 CONNMARK tcp -- any any anywhere anywhere ipp2p v0.8.1_rc1 --ipp2p CONNMARK restore 11456 2016247 ACCEPT tcp -- any any an...

I've gotten errors like this when it was actually a selinux denial. If you're running selinux, check those logs too. Bill On 1/16/2017 4:09 PM, Mark Foley wrote: > More info ... > > This is the only user having this permission problem. All other Thunderbird/dovecot users are > getting mail file. They all have the same permissions set on their Maildir folder. > > --Mark

Hi.... Help me please!!! I am using Linux Redhat as router of the my network. I am to making NAT and firewall. In my iptables script, I need make 3 MARKs for the same packet, as following # It marks the packets that will go for link ADSL (I have 2 links - adsl 2Mb and ''dedicate link'' 256Mb ) # I am using ''ip rule / ip route'' to make this iptables

Hi all, I am running Slackware 10.1 with Kernel 2.6.14.3 includes iptables 1.3.4 with layer 7 My network diagram below: - INTERNET --- LINUX_ROUTER_FW --- PCs Below is my simple iptables script: - echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m layer7 --l7proto applejuice -j MARK --set-mark 1 iptables -t

Hi all! I''m trying to shape traffic in a dorm''s network (4 mbit symmetrical internet link, about 200 computers, heavy p2p usage). The router is a p4xeon running linux 2.6.9 with the qnet patches (http://kem.p.lodz.pl/~peter/qnet/). When I activate ip_forward I get >20% packet loss and a lot of duplicates. Any ideas? I attach my shaping script. Thank you very much in advance,

'getAnywhere' is not reporting methods when there are periods in the class name or the generic name (in R-devel). > getAnywhere( 'predict.loess') A single object matching 'predict.loess' was found It was found in the following places registered S3 method for predict from namespace modreg namespace:modreg with value <<...>> > getAnywhere(

...tables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -m mark ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -o ${if_inet} --dport 21 -j MARK --set-mark 0x111 iptables -t mangle -A POSTROUTING -j CONNMARK --save-mark So, when an ICMP packet comes to the 2nd (''restore-mark'') line, it is already marked with 0x110. Will the restore-mark mark the packet with 0 since there is no connmark set for ICMP? Or it will leave the packet untouched? In that case, I can not redirect the ICMP packet to the class I defined for it. What is the solution for this issue? What to do if I have different classificatio...

Hello! My system is: Internet ADSL(PPPoE) ---> ppp0 [LINUX server(router)] eth0 ---> LAN Server(router) is running on LINUX Slackware 8.1. I have recompiled a 2.4.22 kernel, enabled all QoS support in the kernel config, including HTB. My ADSL bandwidth is 256Kbit/s for download and 64Kbit/s for upload. I use the following HTB+IPTABLES configuration, because I want to reduce bandwith for

I have many iptables setmark commands, but as soon as there is one match, I would like to skip all the rest. How to do this. -------not-working-not-mark-zero-is-not-accepted--------- iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING ..... -j MARK --set-mark ..... iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -m MARK ! --mark 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING ..... -j MARK --set-mark ..... iptables -t mangle -A

Hi, I use for a customer a Linux router/firewall with 1 internal interface connected to the LAN and 3 external interfaces connected to 3 different ISP. I use a kernel 2.6.17 with a routes patch from Julian Anastasov. I mark outgoing FTP traffic for the routing. With the rules below I do not have a problem with the active/normal FTP to connect on FTP server. But the passive FTP does not pass

-> Hi! -> -> I''ve a Linux Box that I want to apply a filter -> in order to limit FTP salient traffic from my -> linux box to internet. -> -> I''ve a: -> Red Hat 7.2 -> Kernel 2.4.20 (with HTB built in!) -> iptables 1.2.7a -> -> Also, I get "tc" binnary package from HTB home page. -> -> I have a script in

Hi.... Help me please!!! I am using Linux Redhat as gateway of the my network to internet. I am to making NAT and firewall. In my iptables script, I need make 3 MARKs for the same packet, as following # It marks the packets that will go for link ADSL (I have 2 links - adsl 2Mb and ''dedicate link'' 256Mb ) # I am using ''ip rule / ip route'' to make this

Hi, I''ve been implementing a load balancing solution using CONNMARK, based on solution described by Luciano Ruete at [1]. Gracias por el post y por apuntar en la dirección correcta Luciano! Once implemented, I''ve found that due to some reason packets aren''t properly marked (or improperly remarked) and sent out using the wrong interface. My topo setup is: [82.123.136.74]: eth1 : mark:0x1 --\ +--[FW BOX] -- eth0: 192.168.0.53 [217.146.74.82]: eth2 : mark:0x2 --/ Using conntrack tool, shows that after a while, it starts to appear...

dear all iam newbie , i have 256 kbits of down link and 64 kbits of up link iam using squid and htb i have got this while browsing the net , there are some few issues i need help while running the script i want browsing to be as fast as possible , uplink especially kaaza should not eat my band width. eth1 got public ip address and eth0 is internal with network 10.0.0.0/24 iam also using nat

tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master head: 7b50567bdcad8925ca1e075feb7171c12015afd1 commit: 0737e01de9c411e4db87dcedf4a9789d41b1c5c1 ocfs2: ocfs2_mount_volume does cleanup job before return error config: arm64-randconfig-m041-20230329 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230401/202304012244.gX4H4rBO-lkp at intel.com/config) compiler:

Hi all!! I was trying to figure out how iptables marks work. I thought that a packet could just be marked once into a chain (if the packet matchs the criteria, then it the action is applied, and that''s all for the packet into this chain), but I was wrong: I did iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 7 iptables -t mangle -A INPUT -i eth0 -j MARK --set-mark 8 and then I did `...

Hi, I have dovecot 2.0.20 running (its an old version, I know, it came from the stable archive at OpenCSW) with Solaris SMF integration working fine. It enables and disables okay. However, I cantt connect to it, it is allowing the connection, but spewing on permissions: Nov 24 17:34:20 proliant-1 dovecot: [ID 583609 mail.info] master: Dovecot v2.0.20 starting up Nov 24 17:34:27 proliant-1