search for: markable_type

...ecord::Base has_one :property_name has_one :property_value end , which isn''t that unnatural -- however, just having additional classes holding, only id references, seems like not as great as if the polymorphic implementation in Mark class can actually allow Class#Field as the value for markable_type. What do you think? Any other suggestion? (BTW, yes, I suppose Property can add :through assocation to directly access :markable for convenience.) Thanks! -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/.