search for: manni

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 113 matches for "manni".

Did you mean: mann
2012 Nov 26
4
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the version I have been using. If it is already implemented than it is very good news. Thanks. -----Original Message----- From: Eli Bendersky [mailto:eliben at google.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:25 AM To: Manny Ko Cc: Albert Graef; Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT
2012 Nov 26
1
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
I see. If I am writing my own listener can I still get back the (llvm::Function, void* Code, size_t Size)? Ciao. -----Original Message----- From: Kaylor, Andrew [mailto:andrew.kaylor at intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:24 PM To: Manny Ko Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC No. It adds a new event,
2012 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
Thanks Andrew for the update. Does it support NotifyFunctionEmitted? Cheers. -----Original Message----- From: Kaylor, Andrew [mailto:andrew.kaylor at intel.com] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 1:06 PM To: Manny Ko Cc: LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: RE: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine
2012 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
No. It adds a new event, 'NotifyObjectEmitted'. The Intel JIT listener that I mentioned then uses the emitted object to find the functions (which are all emitted together). Because of the way that MCJIT is implemented, it isn't really feasible to reconstruct things like the EmittedFunctionDetails in the NotifyFunctionEmitted event. -Andy -----Original Message----- From: Manny Ko
2012 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
The current 3.2 code branch has events being broadcast from the MCJIT engine when a new object is emitted, but the profiling listeners do not do anything with the events (and I don't expect they will before the 3.2 release becomes official). I have implemented some code in trunk since the 3.2 branch to traverse the emitted object and pick out named functions in the IntelJITEventsListener. An
2012 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
Ops. I meant to say 3.1. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Manny Ko Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 9:27 AM To: Eli Bendersky Cc: Benjamin Kramer; LLVM Developers Mailing List Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC Sorry for speaking too soon. It is missing from 3.2 which is the
1999 Jan 06
2
access to printers
I have a closed network (no outside access) with a small user base (less than 20), with no other network connections) running Samba 1.9.18p10 on Solaris 2.4. Problem: Some users utilize the workstations on the network as stand alone systems. They need access to printers, but I don't want to create an account just for this purpose. I would like to provide access to the printers without
2005 Sep 15
3
Portsentry
I'm running CentOS 4 with Blue Quartz on a white box, and having problems with installing Portsentry vi the .tar.gz route. Various errors, etc. Anyone here know of a source, like an RPM or something, for Portsentry for CentOS? ... or a similar app? thnx, Manny
2007 Oct 16
3
About wget
I've been downloading a software for a friend with wget, but as my connexion to internet is not so good, wget downloaded in three parts by example: SetupDxLabelMakerSoftonic.exe SetupDxLabelMakerSoftonic.exe.1 SetupDxLabelMakerSoftonic.exe.1.1 My question is: Is there any way to join all of this or Do I have to download that again? Hope an answer thanks to all manny -- "Nuestra
2012 Nov 26
0
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 9:18 AM, Manny Ko <Manny.Ko at imgtec.com> wrote: > I know the old JIT pretty well but have only used the MCJIT from the client side. Most of my experience is on the x86backend though. > > Another critical feature missing from MCJIT is the JITEventListener. This is usually for supporting debuggers and profiling tools. What makes you say it is missing? Eli
2006 Jun 06
14
How can I set the session in a functional test?
Hey :) I need to simulate a login in my functional test, otherwise I can''t GET nor POST to the action. I need to set the session key "logged_in_user_id". I tried this inside the setup() method: session[''logged_in_user_id''] = 1 But that throws: TypeError: can''t convert String into Integer Any ideas? Thanks, Rob -------------- next part
2012 Nov 26
2
[LLVMdev] Removing old JIT CodeEmitters for ARM and PPC
I know the old JIT pretty well but have only used the MCJIT from the client side. Most of my experience is on the x86backend though. Another critical feature missing from MCJIT is the JITEventListener. This is usually for supporting debuggers and profiling tools. Ciao. -----Original Message----- From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [mailto:llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] On Behalf Of Albert
2012 Aug 29
3
Bonferroni correction for multiple correlation tests
Please can someone advise me how I can adjust correlations using bonferroni's correction? I am doing manny correlation tests as part of an investigation of the validity/reliability of a psychometric measure. Help would be so appreciated! Cheers, Louise
2008 Aug 10
2
Multiple Users
I could not find another thread that talked about this but all my searched pulled up manny manny results so I may have overlooked some. The problem I have is that I recently upgraded my ubuntu 7.10 to 8.04 and the new version of wine (1.1.2) has broken my setup. I run a machine with multiple user (5) and to simplify my life all there Microsoft software they needed was installed under wine and
2006 Jun 06
5
Functional tests and protected actions
Hello! I have certain methods in my Application Controller, that I need to access. Namely ApplicationController#logged_in_user The problem is, that when I try to access it, I get: NoMethodError: protected method `logged_in_user'' called for #<AdminController> Any ideas how I can circumvent that? Or are functional tests really not suited for any kind of logins and session work?
2006 Mar 16
4
Handling/Catching Exceptions
Hello! I was wondering, sometimes I raise an exception in my Rails apps, e.g.: raise SecurityError unless @post.user == logged_in_user Now: is there any way to catch that SecurityError exception somewhere and render a custom template? E.g., I want to render ''app/views/content/security_error.rhtml'' Does anyone know how to do this? Thanks a bunch, Rob
2009 Oct 21
1
Use of the command 'replicate'
Dear R users, I'd like to ask u whether you know how to sort out the following: I'm trying to reproduce a dataset of clusters, and for that I need to build up a cluster index (inside a function) using the command "replicate" as follows: dataset<- function( clusters=100, cluster.size=50, outcome.mean=list(mean=3, sd=1), outcome.var=list(mean=0, sd=1), treat=1, unbal =
2006 Jan 23
0
Firewall/Embeded System/CF/etc
Manny, You really need to try Astlinux. See www.astlinux.org. It does pretty much what you desire. Also see my recent article about Aslinux embedded on a Soekris Net4801 (http://www.tomsnetworking.com/Sections-article153.php) Michael Graves Sr Product Specialist Pixel Power Inc mgraves@pixelpower.com o(713) 861-4005 o(800) 905-6412 f(713) 864-8668 c(713) 201-1262 > -------- Original
2007 Sep 25
3
XMMS on CentOS 5
I would like to know why CentOS doesn't have xmms. -- "Nuestra recompensa se encuentra en el esfuerzo y no en el resultado. Un esfuerzo total es una victoria completa". Mahatma Gandhi (@ @) |------o00o-(_)-o00o----------| |Manuel Enrique Ch?vez Manzano| |manuel864 at gmail.com | |manny at cmc.cfg.sld.cu
2013 Sep 19
0
[LLVMdev] Proposal to improve vzeroupper optimization strategy
Great idea. I reported on this problem before and glad to see someone trying to tackle this. cheers. ________________________________________ From: llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu [llvmdev-bounces at cs.uiuc.edu] on behalf of Gao, Yunzhong [yunzhong_gao at playstation.sony.com] Sent: Thursday, September 19, 2013 11:53 AM To: llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Subject: [LLVMdev] Proposal to improve