search for: manman

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:41 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >>...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >&...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >&g...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.c...

...the type array and it is not a DIType. What are your thoughts? Suggestions are welcome. Is it a good idea to canonicalize file names (i.e dA/B.h should be equivalent to dA/../dA/B.h)? This will reduce the chance of having two DITypes that should be equivalent with equivalent file names. Thanks, Manman -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140714/552c0418/attachment.html>

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:57 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:47 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 5:26 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com...

...the form may be _flag or _flag_present - that's just an implementation detail. So in short, I would suggest you not modify the comment at all (leave it as it is today) - with that, please commit this patch. Did you find a test case for the worklist code yet? On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > Ping :) > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> &gt...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >&...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >&...

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 1:14 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > >> > >>...

Also r174479. Manman On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > What version of clang are you using? I think r174785 is the fix. > > Manman > > > On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 11:04 AM, lipengcheng <pli at cs.rochester.edu> wrote: > >>...

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <man...

On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:54 AM, Eric Christopher <echristo at gmail.com>wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 9:08 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >&...

Ping :) On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 5:22 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> David, >> >> Thanks for reviewing! >> >> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gm...

On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 12:01 PM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:45 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:26 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com>wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.c...

On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 11:32 AM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> We still have access to types via MDNodes directly and the assertion that >> assumes all accesses to DITypes are access...

On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:47 PM Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 2:32 PM Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 10:53 AM Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Manman, >>> >>> Ordering profiling is certainly something very useful to have to sta...

On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:32 PM, Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > David, > > Thanks for reviewing! > > On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 11:36 AM, David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Might be easier if these were on Phabricator, but here are some thoughts: >> >> 0001:...

...igned to SecOffset, not added to it. (eg: if you have CUs at 0, 42, and 57 - the first pass through SecOffset will be zero, then it'll be 0 + 42, then on the 3rd it'll be (0 + 42) + 57 which isn't right, it should just be 57). Please add more test coverage while fixing this issue. Eric/Manman: rough design question: compute the absolute offset of each CU within the debug_info section and describe them all relative to a single symbol at the start of the debug_info section, or should we put a label at the start of each CU? 0002: ref_addr_relocation.ll: seems a bit vague in terms of...

On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 9:10 PM Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 4:11 PM Xinliang David Li <davidxl at google.com> > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 3:56 PM Manman Ren <manman.ren at gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Some backgro...