search for: mandeep

...efault index.html from public folder. Can anyone tell me how to add link rails-app/app/views/home/index.html.erb to index.html in /rails-app/public folder webpage? If i have created symbolic link to rails-app/../../home then its not working. .html.erb file is not working directly in browser. -- Mandeep Kaur http://mandeepsimak.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send...

...ium (Wildcard TDM400P) 3. Sangoma (A200 Analog FXO/FXS) All i need is to put asterisk in place with 4-8 incomming lines (ordinary POTS ). With IVR, Voice mail and International Call via SIP. Office is having 12 phone lines. Thanks in Advance to all who shared his/her wisdom. -- With Regards, Mandeep Singh Bhabha email: mandeep at ponimanie.spb.ru

...sult, the behavior of the .cfi_sections differs for ARM vs AArch64. Due to this, my test which checks for .cfi_sections and .debug_frame passes for ARM but fails for AArch64. Could you please clarify, why the behavior for handling .cfi_sections needs to be different between ARM and AArch64? --Mandeep -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170405/141ac1ad/attachment.html>

...Change SmallPtrSet to SmallVector for the container (VarDecls) being iterated - this may have a compile time impact (need to measure). 2. Sort the container (VarDecls) before iteration. We can sort based on decl source location and decl name. Not sure if these guaranteed to be unique? Thanks, Mandeep -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20170601/8a140647/attachment.html>

I want to install Ruby 1.8.7 and Rails 2.8.3,i am using ubuntu 11. Thank you -- Posted via http://www.ruby-forum.com/. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

Hi All, I want to know the compatibility of Ubuntu with Rails. Anyone know which Ubuntu version support Rails 2.x and Rails 3.x. -- Mandeep Kaur http://mandeepsimak.wordpress.com/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Ruby on Rails: Talk" group. To post to this group, send email to rubyonrails-talk-/JYPxA39Uh5TLH3MbocFF+G/Ez6ZCGd0@public.gmane.org To unsubscribe from this group, send...

Ping From: Mandeep Singh Grang [mailto:mgrang at codeaurora.org] Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 4:34 PM To: 'llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu' Cc: 'ghoflehner at apple.com'; 'apazos at codeaurora.org'; mgrang at codeaurora.org Subject: Question on Machine Combiner Pass Hi, In the file lib/Cod...

...ang :: Analysis/malloc.c Clang :: Rewriter/objc-modern-metadata-visibility.mm Clang :: SemaCXX/warn-loop-analysis.cpp LLVM :: Transforms/SimplifyCFG/bug-25299.ll Next Steps: I plan to extend this behavior to the iteration of other unordered containers (like DenseMap, etc). Thanks, Mandeep On 11/15/2016 3:06 PM, Grang, Mandeep Singh wrote: > Everyone, > > There is non-determinism in LLVM codegen in the following scenarios: > > 1. Between back-to-back runs of the same LLVM toolchain > 2. Between Release vs Release+Asserts toolchains > 3. Between Linux vs Windows...

...e user's normal std::sort, the second time we random shuffle the container and then sort again, and then check if there is a difference in the two outputs. The run time cost would be the cost of the shuffle + the extra sort + the cost of checking the two containers [O(n lg n)  + 2 O(n)]. --Mandeep On 8/9/2018 11:13 AM, David Blaikie wrote: > 1) I'm not sure it's do-able. I don't know of any nice way to track > whether an ordered walk of an unordered container leaks out into the > final output of the program. Only iterating over an unordered > container is probabl...

...s (like DenseMap) 2. Somehow enable reverse iteration in the lit framework for all tests so that we can uncover these issues quickly Please feel free to review my patch for reverse iteration. I would welcome comments/suggestions for improving/extending the patch and enabling it in lit. Thanks, Mandeep -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20161115/7af827c4/attachment.html>

...FeatureKV/ table: /{ "a9", "Cortex-A9 ARM processors", { ARM::ProcA9 }, { *ARM::FeatureFP16* } }, /With your change, the features for ProcA9 in the above entry are empty.//This ARMFeatureKV table is then read in MC/MCSubtargetInfo.cpp in the getFeatures() function. Thanks, Mandeep On 2/24/2016 2:42 AM, Bradley Smith wrote: > > Hi, > > The idea behind that change was to make ARM.td clearer, that is, > adding architecture features to new architecture subtarget features, > and to have the CPUs inherit from this. ProcA9 (and similar) from what > I could...

...objects having the same key. All occurrences of std::sort have been changed to llvm::sort in llvm/clang/polly repos. Going forward please make sure to avoid use of std::sort and instead use llvm::sort. Maybe we should add a note on the usage of llvm::sort to the LLVM Coding Standards? Thanks, Mandeep -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20180413/f521f2e5/attachment.html>

> On 2016-Nov-15, at 15:16, Hal Finkel <hfinkel at anl.gov> wrote: > > ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev Grang" <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> >> To: llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org, "mehdi amini" <mehdi.amini at apple.com>, dexonsmith at apple.com, zinob at codeaurora.org >> Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2016 5:06:29 PM >> Subject: [llvm-dev] Non...

...is not being set. In my case, if I add FeatureFP16 back to the ProcA9 definition in ARM.td I get back all the lost performance. Could you please give me some insight on how, after your change, do the Proc features get correctly set in MCSubtargetInfo and other places which access Proc? Thanks, Mandeep -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20160223/30dcc51a/attachment.html>

On 30 August 2017 at 18:51, David Blaikie via llvm-dev <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 11:45 AM Grang, Mandeep Singh via cfe-dev > <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> >> Hi All, >> >> I wanted to share a couple of updates on the effort to uncover >> non-determinism in LLVM through reverse iteration. >> >> 1. Reverse iteration has now been enabled for Dens...

...rrent form. I would like comments/suggestions from the community on: 1. Are static analysis checks to detect non-determinism something worth doing/doable? 2. How about writing sanitizers to detect non-deterministic behavior? Would that be too costly in terms of run time and instrumentation? --Mandeep

...hen pinpointing the exact container causing the problem would be more tedious. So I propose to add an optional value field to this flag, like -mllvm -reverse-iterate=smallptrset -mllvm -reverse-iterate=densemap, etc. I would like to hear the community's thoughts on these proposals. Thanks, Mandeep

...et me know if the community wants the nightly notifications even with the failures. As a potential next step, I was thinking about bootstrapping this reverse iteration LLVM to compile itself. Not sure if it can uncover more bugs but maybe worth a shot. All comments/suggestions welcome. Thanks, Mandeep

On 13 April 2018 at 21:24, Grang, Mandeep Singh via cfe-dev <cfe-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Going forward please make sure to avoid use of std::sort and instead use > llvm::sort. Maybe we should add a note on the usage of llvm::sort to the > LLVM Coding Standards? Very definitely. I quite like the idea, but banning a s...

On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 6:39 PM, Hans Wennborg <hans at chromium.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 13, 2016 at 4:57 PM, Grang, Mandeep Singh via llvm-dev > <llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote: >> Everyone, >> >> The following patch to reverse iterate SmallPtrSet's has now been merged: >> https://reviews.llvm.org/D26718 >> >> This is how LLVM behavior will change due to this patch: &g...