search for: mandatories

When I enable server signing in Samba (server signing = mandatory), I can still join a Window 7 machine to the domain but I am no longer able to log on into the domain using a domain user. Is this normal? I am using Samba 3.6.3 on Linux 12.04. Is there anything that needs to be configured on the Windows machine? Thanks, Ali

On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Alastair Bridgewater <alastair.bridgewater at gmail.com> wrote: > HDMI specification 1.4a, table 8-15 is very explicitly a "must > support at least one of" table, not a "must support all of" table. > It is not hard to find hardware that does not support some of the > so-called "mandatory" modes. > > More

Hello! I am running samba 3.0 on fc2 in a win2000 network. I want to use only mandatory profiles in the network, but can't get this to work properly. I have set up a "perfect user" on my local machine", and copied this profile to \\server\netlogon\Default User. I have also made this default profile mandatory by renaming ntuser.dat to ntuser.man. In smb.conf I have added:

hello guys i want to slimming my asterisk by loading only mandatory modules. in order to do that, i edit my modules.conf file and set autoload=no and load just mandatory modules. my problem is, how should i determine which modules are necessary to asterisk works correctly? i have sip, h323 and dahdi connection on my asterisk. is there any documentation about mandatory modules for asterisk? or

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:10:56AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Alastair Bridgewater > <alastair.bridgewater at gmail.com> wrote: > > HDMI specification 1.4a, table 8-15 is very explicitly a "must > > support at least one of" table, not a "must support all of" table. > > It is not hard to find hardware that does not

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 6:45 AM, Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau at intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 12:10:56AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 5:42 PM, Alastair Bridgewater >> <alastair.bridgewater at gmail.com> wrote: >> > HDMI specification 1.4a, table 8-15 is very explicitly a "must >> > support at least one

Hello, I'm experiencing very slow read/write performance, about 20 MB/s, on Samba share when I configure the "server signing" option as "mandatory". Once I set "server signing" to "default", the read/write performance returns to average speed about 800 MB/s. I am using Samba 4.9.4 on server with Intel Xeon CPU E5-2690 0 @ 2.90GHz (32 threads) and 10 Gbit

Hello, When I add "server signing = mandatory" to my smb.conf file (AIX V6.1, 6100-04-11-1140 running Samba v3.6.5) that has "encrypt passwords = no", my windows client no longer can connect. It fails with system error 64. The windows system is running XP vers 2002 with service pack 3. The security settings are set to: Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications

Hi list, I'm new to clustering, and I'm running a little cluster at home. The cluster is running on a workstation hardware and running on Centos 6.5. Component: corosync, pacemaker, drbd and pcs. All works good. This cluster has different resources: 1) drbd0 2) drbd1 3) drbd0_fs 4) drbd1_fs 5) pgsql 6) smb + nmb 7) libvirt (lbs) 8) libvirt_guests (lsb) I've this constraint

Hello, Has anyone had a chance to review this question? Thank you, Bill ----- Forwarded by Bill Chockla/Durham/Contr/IBM on 09/26/2012 10:04 AM ----- From: Bill Chockla/Durham/Contr/IBM To: samba at samba.org, Date: 09/10/2012 12:52 PM Subject: Connection fails with Server/Client Signing = Mandatory Hello, When I add "server signing = mandatory" to my smb.conf file (AIX V6.1,

The wiki page settings control a netlogon security setting. I guess the "server signing" parameter applies to all the other traffic. But my guess - and it is only a guess- is that requiring server signing is causing the netlogon process to break since it does not support signing. The e-mail chain you reference does not make it clear if the samba instance is a domain

Hello Samba-Specialists, which smb.conf-options do I have to set to get access to a Samba-Share from a Windows7-Machine, if the Windows7-Machine is very restrictive configured regarding 'smb-signing'? Windows7-Configuration: Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (if server agrees): Enabled Microsoft network client: Digitally sign communications (always): Enabled

On 17/01/2023 12:49, Peter Milesson via samba wrote: > Hi folks, > > Is a default route and gateway mandatory on a Samba member server? I would have thought they were mandatory on any computer, never mind Samba. > > The AD DCs, the workstations and the Samba member server are on the same > network segment. As the member server only serves files to the local > network, I

On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 04:46:21PM +0530, VigneshDhanraj G via samba wrote: > Hi team, > > I want to configure server signing as mandatory without reducing speed, but > you have mentioned that remove the server signing. > Can you please explain why 90% speed is reducing after configured server > signing as mandatory? Completely depends on your platform and OS. Are you using

I have not tried with a Samba 4.x DC. As far as I know Samba 4.x does not have this limitation. On 01/06/15 04:10, ali-reza.fahimi at schneider-electric.com wrote: > > Does this mean that we cannot use mandatory server signing in Samba 3? > What about the later versions? The problem is that lack of server > signing is considered a security hole. > > > Inactive hide

Virtio is using memory barriers to control the ordering of references to the vrings on SMP systems. When the guest is compiled with SMP support, virtio is only using SMP barriers in order to avoid incurring the overhead involved with mandatory barriers. Lately, though, virtio is being increasingly used with inter-processor communication scenarios too, which involve running two (separate)

Virtio is using memory barriers to control the ordering of references to the vrings on SMP systems. When the guest is compiled with SMP support, virtio is only using SMP barriers in order to avoid incurring the overhead involved with mandatory barriers. Lately, though, virtio is being increasingly used with inter-processor communication scenarios too, which involve running two (separate)

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:27:16AM -0500, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > Damien - did you ever test these mandatory modes on an actual > commercial 3D TV or similar device? My main testing device was a Samsung TV with this 3D_present bit set and all the advertised modes were working. Can't quite remember if that included the interleaved mode. -- Damien

Nicolas, Thank you!? But I am Dyslexic and very mono-linguistic; at least I could read the actual commands, if not all the wonderful comments... On 08/06/2018 10:26 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 06/08/2018 ? 16:05, Robert Moskowitz a ?crit?: >> But notes that this installs Gnome (which I don't want) and that instead to >> >> yum groupinstall ?X Window System? >>

Hello all, I've been trying to figure out what the best way of doing the group policy thing is. We are running samba 3 on slackware 9 with winxp clients. We are a school. i'm unclear on how much AD is actually supported... OU GPO all that. so i decided to go the "administrative template" way (used to be .pol files) I'm thinking of having the students run off of a