search for: manatees

...the inactive device instead of removing the entire default route. Is there a way to tell the kernel to do that? Or to not remove the route at all and just mark the "nexthop" with the inactive device as dead and wait for it to come back alive? Thank you! -- Linux 2.6.22: Holy Dancing Manatees, Batman! http://www.lastfm.pt/user/danielfraga http://u-br.net The Cranberries - "Dreams" (Everybody Else Is Doing It, So Why Can''t We?) Linux 2.6.22: Holy Dancing Manatees, Batman! http://www.lastfm.pt/user/danielfraga http://u-br.net Oasis - "Wonderwall" ((What'...

...er daemon, which acts like a proxy, and opened multiple connections to a ftp/http/whatever server and it distributed the connections over the links... very nice. This way we don''t have to mess with the kernel. The method is elegant and transparent. Thanks! -- Linux 2.6.22: Holy Dancing Manatees, Batman! http://www.lastfm.pt/user/danielfraga http://u-br.net Alphaville - "Big in Japan" (First Harvest 1984-92)

I run a pair of dovecot servers for personal small domains with several layers of backup in place ... - The two dovecot servers replicate to each via a Tinc vpn mesh. That gives email resiliency. - All mail is replicated via offlineimap to a 3rd server over that Tinc vpn. It's on the mesh, it has space, so why not ? - All mail is replicated as well as via mbsync to a zfs dataset on my

Hello list, I built an email system using a proxy / director pair (IMAP, POP3, LMTP) and a backend pair. To have an HA system, I would like to understand if it is better to use an NFS export or replication to save emails and index files NFS is provided by a NAS (in HA), while for replication I would use the local backend disks Which of the two systems is more reliable? Are there any drawbacks

copy d:\bugs.ps \\ouessant\lexmark after having deleted all the samba log files and restarted the SMBd daemon from the SWAT Web interface. This leads to the INTERNAL ERROR, see samba.oulx Now, to locate the problem, I tried the same kind of command on the same file, bugs.ps, but using the SMBCLIENT application from the Linux server itself, without changing anything, nor restarting the SMBd

I'm not really sure if this is a samba problem or a linux network problem, I have checked the newsgroups and ive seen this question pop up a few times, w/o answer. Here is the issure I am having, whenever the i do a smbclient -L hostname for this particular server I get the following message in the logs: open_oplock_ipc: Failed to get local UDP socket for address 100007f. Error was Cannot