search for: manageiq

...not CentOS for what regards lvm2-cluster; in my opinion it is correct that it is included in "Resilient Storage" group. So that if you already had this group installed but not lvm2-cluster rpm package, it was a problem before, not now.... Eg, in a CentOS 7.2 vm of mine I have: [root at manageiq ~]# rpm -q lvm2-cluster package lvm2-cluster is not installed [root at manageiq ~]# [root at manageiq ~]# rpm -q lvm2 lvm2-2.02.130-5.el7.x86_64 [root at manageiq ~]# [root at manageiq ~]# yum update . . . centos-release x86_64 7-3.1611.el7.centos base 23 k ....

Hi, I ran "yum update" this morning on a 7.2 machine with all of the cr updates applied to it and yum wants to install lvm-cluster and a bunch of deps. Dependencies Resolved ====================================================================== Package Arch Version Repository Size ======================================================================

New code tries SIGTERM first, with a grace period of 30 seconds: https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-content/pull/433. On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 6:10 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:57:19PM +0200, Fabien Dupont wrote: > > It's not virt-v2v-wrapper that kills virt-v2v, it's ManageIQ. We have the > > PID from virt-v2...

...-cluster; in my opinion it is correct that it is included in "Resilient > Storage" group. > So that if you already had this group installed but not lvm2-cluster rpm > package, it was a problem before, not now.... > > Eg, in a CentOS 7.2 vm of mine I have: > > [root at manageiq ~]# rpm -q lvm2-cluster > package lvm2-cluster is not installed > [root at manageiq ~]# (shadow pts2) # rpm -q lvm2-cluster package lvm2-cluster is not installed (shadow pts2) # > > [root at manageiq ~]# rpm -q lvm2 > lvm2-2.02.130-5.el7.x86_64 > [root at manageiq ~]# Hummm, Ac...

...output support and migration throttling and this implies > > changes to virt-v2v-wrapper. This is then the opportunity to think > > about virt-v2v-wrapper maintenance and feature set. It has been > > created in the first place to simplify interaction with virt-v2v > > from ManageIQ. > > Stepping back here, the upstream community on this mailing list have > no idea what you mean by the terms "IMS", "virt-v2v-wrapper" and > "ManageIQ". I'll try to explain briefly: > > * ManageIQ (http://manageiq.org/) = a kind of scriptable,...

...hallenges. We're working on OpenStack output support and migration throttling and this implies changes to virt-v2v-wrapper. This is then the opportunity to think about virt-v2v-wrapper maintenance and feature set. It has been created in the first place to simplify interaction with virt-v2v from ManageIQ. The first challenge we faced is the interaction with virt-v2v. It's highly versatile and proposes a lot of options for input and output. The downside of it is that over time is becomes more and more difficult to know them all. And all the error messages are made for human beings, not machines...

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 03/16/2015 11:33 AM, Jim Perrin wrote: > My only question is, how do we determine what goes in the wiki vs > what goes in git? The flow/format between the two is a bit > different. Or is this development the first step in the transition > away from the wiki to another medium? That's a good question, and I don't have it

...ng on > OpenStack output support and migration throttling and this implies > changes to virt-v2v-wrapper. This is then the opportunity to think > about virt-v2v-wrapper maintenance and feature set. It has been > created in the first place to simplify interaction with virt-v2v > from ManageIQ. Stepping back here, the upstream community on this mailing list have no idea what you mean by the terms "IMS", "virt-v2v-wrapper" and "ManageIQ". I'll try to explain briefly: * ManageIQ (http://manageiq.org/) = a kind of scriptable, universal management tool...

...;s not good). There's IMHO a bigger problem which is not being addressed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318922 > What's the reason behind this patch? There's a bit of background which is missing. Tomáš and I had some discussions (privately, unfortunately) with the ManageIQ developers who are integrating virt-v2v into MIQ/CloudForms. Their existing software runs a separate virt-sysprep step on guests after they have been converted by virt-v2v. They disable all sysprep the operations except for just a couple, including ‘net-hwaddr’, so the effect is roughly the same...

...the wiki to another medium? > > That's a good question, and I don't have it answered. :) It has to do > with our intention/thinking as a group. Providing feedback from another project where the website is backed by Git, and the workflow for user contributions is documented http://manageiq.org At the foot of every page is a link "Edit this page on github" (eg: http://manageiq.org/documentation/ ). It's been a while since I looked, but my experience was that there were very few clicks through to edit and PRs. Anecdotally, people didn't realise they could propose ed...

...t; > > That's a good question, and I don't have it answered. :) It has to do > > with our intention/thinking as a group. > > Providing feedback from another project where the website is backed by > Git, and the workflow for user contributions is documented > http://manageiq.org > > At the foot of every page is a link "Edit this page on github" (eg: > http://manageiq.org/documentation/ ). > > It's been a while since I looked, but my experience was that there were > very few clicks through to edit and PRs. Anecdotally, people didn't...

On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:25 PM Nitin Rane <Nitin.Rane@techmahindra.com> wrote: > Hi Arik,Shahar, > (Adding libguestfs mailing-list) Hi Nitin, > I am looking to migrate VMs from Openstack Juno to Openstack Newton and > from VMWare to Openstack Newton. > > While doing google search I came across the link authored by you, >

...ressed: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318922 > > > > > What's the reason behind this patch? > > > > There's a bit of background which is missing. Tomáš and I had some > > discussions (privately, unfortunately) with the ManageIQ developers > > who are integrating virt-v2v into MIQ/CloudForms. Their existing > > software runs a separate virt-sysprep step on guests after they have > > been converted by virt-v2v. They disable all sysprep the operations > > except for just a couple, including ‘net-hwa...

On Wed, Sep 26, 2018 at 04:57:19PM +0200, Fabien Dupont wrote: > It's not virt-v2v-wrapper that kills virt-v2v, it's ManageIQ. We have the > PID from virt-v2v-wrapper state file. What would be the preferred way > to interrupt it ? It's not too nice to send kill -9 to virt-v2v because it means none of the at-exit handlers get to run, so it will leave temporary files all over the place. It's better to send a...

...ou want, then > examine the resulting Cinder volumes, extract the properties and image > properties and run the VM using those properties? > > Did you look at a converted VM and see the properties and image > properties that we are setting? > That would mean moving that part into ManageIQ or virt-v2v-wrapper. But, I don't see why virt-v2v-wrapper is not part of librguest/virt-v2v as it is not limited to RHV conversions anymore. It adds a API-like interface to virt-v2v, as well as monitoring capabilities that are really valuable. I'm thinking about a evolution of virt-v2v-wra...

...t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318922 Possibly there could be also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451597 > > What's the reason behind this patch? > > There's a bit of background which is missing. Tomáš and I had some > discussions (privately, unfortunately) with the ManageIQ developers > who are integrating virt-v2v into MIQ/CloudForms. Their existing > software runs a separate virt-sysprep step on guests after they have > been converted by virt-v2v. They disable all sysprep the operations > except for just a couple, including ‘net-hwaddr’, so the effect...

...a bigger problem which is not being addressed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318922 > > > What's the reason behind this patch? > > There's a bit of background which is missing. Tomáš and I had some > discussions (privately, unfortunately) with the ManageIQ developers > who are integrating virt-v2v into MIQ/CloudForms. Their existing > software runs a separate virt-sysprep step on guests after they have > been converted by virt-v2v. They disable all sysprep the operations > except for just a couple, including ‘net-hwaddr’, so the effect...

...; > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318922 > > > > > > > What's the reason behind this patch? > > > > > > There's a bit of background which is missing. Tomáš and I had some > > > discussions (privately, unfortunately) with the ManageIQ developers > > > who are integrating virt-v2v into MIQ/CloudForms. Their existing > > > software runs a separate virt-sysprep step on guests after they have > > > been converted by virt-v2v. They disable all sysprep the operations > > > except for just a couple...

Remove ties to MAC address because it is likely to change. The code is based on operations net-hwaddr and udev-persistent-net of virt-sysprep. Signed-off-by: Tomáš Golembiovský <tgolembi@redhat.com> --- v2v/convert_linux.ml | 17 +++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) diff --git a/v2v/convert_linux.ml b/v2v/convert_linux.ml index b273785e6..8bba74786 100644 ---

Hi, There has been discussion about the OpenStack output and Richard asked for a public thread on this list, so here it is. For v2v from VMware to RHV, there is a Python script that does some extra steps to create the virtual machine after the disks have been converted. We want to have the same behavior for OpenStack, i.e. have virt-v2v create the instance once the volumes have been created.