search for: managebl

...m then you should use some counter as prefix or suffix: ''class Item_001; ... end'' Is there any work underway, or sheduled release where classes will exist only in the scope they are defined? Writing spec''s for Og is where this becomes an issue because Og will grab _all_ manageble objects it can ''see''... all sorts of PITA can arise. Thanks for all the great work, T/BDD definitely is a brilliant way to work, and RSpec makes it painless, esp for us amatuers :) Mark

..._nonshared(ptr) // e.g. used after allocation ptr = cast_to_shared_irreversible(ptr) // basically a gateway to other threads nonhared_acquire(ptr) nonshared_release(ptr) shared_acquire(ptr) shared_release(ptr) I also want weak_ptr at a later stage, but leave it out for now to keep the complexity manageble. Is this idea completely unreasonable? Ola. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20201118/14f27ce0/attachment.html>

Hello all, I'd like to update my local src tree (from Wine 20040615), and I'd rather grab a diff instead of the full 10MB so tarball; the README in source.winehq.org refers to some 'Wine-yymmdd.diff.gz' but I can't find any of such. Did I overlook some infos, or are such diffs not available, and I'm supposed to use CVS? thanks -- paolo GPG/PGP id:0x21426690 kfp:EDFB

...allocation > ptr = cast_to_shared_irreversible(ptr) // basically a gateway to other threads > nonhared_acquire(ptr) > nonshared_release(ptr) > shared_acquire(ptr) > shared_release(ptr) > > I also want weak_ptr at a later stage, but leave it out for now to keep the complexity manageble. > > Is this idea completely unreasonable? LLVM has intrinsics for Objective-C ARC (https://llvm.org/docs/LangRef.html#objective-c-arc-runtime-intrinsics) and I think there are also some optimizations passes for those intrinsics. Clang uses those for Objective-C (https://clang.llvm.org/do...

...39;t have any problem doing this with the CTX either. Assuming > you don't have SMDI integration with your voicemail (you didn't state > that you did), you just need the phones to send trailing digits, and > you need to negotiate the lighting of voicemail lights on phones. All > manageble from Asterisk. Nope, no SMDI integration. I'm pretty sure that the trailing digits are being sent already, for the current CallXpress voicemail system. I guess mostly I'm just not certain about how to set up Asterisk to handle this sort of configuration. I've been looking through t...

>From: Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> > >Uh... shouldn't a Win32 port use the Win32 API? > Well, as I see it LLVM contains only tools that are perfectably manageble through a shell. And in this respect, I see the win32/mingw port perfectably achieves this at the moment. >On Tue, 14 Sep 2004 02:11:51 +0200 >"Henrik Bach" <henrik_bach_llvm at hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi > > > > Here is my first patches to the Win32...

I'm interested in setting up Asterisk as a voice mail system for our Toshiba Strata CTX100 PBX. Our current voice mail system connects to the PBX with four analog extensions. Does anyone have information on how to integrate this kind of system with Asterisk? I've looked at the legacy integration section of the Wiki, but it doesn't seem to have anything about Toshiba systems. ---

Hello All, I am sure that this has been asked probably a million times on this list, but for our particular setup, I need to see if there is a way to have Samba authenticate its users based upon the Linux accounts password file? The reason is that we have other applications all working together and most of them are also using the Linux password file which make the process of maintaining

...rsible(ptr) // basically a gateway to >> other threads >> nonhared_acquire(ptr) >> nonshared_release(ptr) >> shared_acquire(ptr) >> shared_release(ptr) >> >> I also want weak_ptr at a later stage, but leave it out for now to >> keep the complexity manageble. >> >> Is this idea completely unreasonable? The main problem for this sort of optimization is that it is difficult to do on an IR like LLVM’s, where the semantic relationships between values that exist in the program have been lowered into a sequence of primitive operations with n...

Has anyone looked into creating custom templates for Microsoft's System Policy editor ? I like the idea of managing workstations through the NTConfig.POL file, but the included templates are quite a bit outdated. Does anyone know if it would be worth-while to take the time and create an updated Template to add policies to manage newer features of Windows 2000/XP through the NTConfig.POL

As 2.2.0 is nearing release, I''ve begun to think about what I''ll do for 2.3 and I think that it is time for Shorewall to add support for IPV6. Because of parsing ambiguities, the need to maintain upward compatibility with both Shorewall and 6Wall, and different available functionality in IPV4 and IPV6 Netfilter, I believe that it is going to be necessary for some files to be

...Subject: Re: [Asterisk-Users] SoftPhones: Bad, or just bad QoS? To: Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion <asterisk-users@lists.digium.com> Message-ID: <1e2050d505071809546c963237@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 > This is software. Use manageble software. If "software" means separate > setup on each desktop, then don't use it. If you spend that much time on > setting up phones, imagine how long it takes you to update other > software packages. This is, then, a symptom of a general problem. I would like to implement...

I finally got my cfengine configs all objectified and separated into service-based configurations. But there are still many things that cfe can''t or won''t do very well, so I''m looking for a replacement. What about puppet? I am looking for something that I can use to manage services and applications, not hosts and files. It seems like puppet may have inherited some of