search for: mallocbench

...t; MultiSource/Benchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.compile 7.21% 1.1218 1.2027 0.0173 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091 > 1.8199 0.0047 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.44% 6.6061 7.0314 > 0.0251 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.compile 6.34% 4.5856 > 4.8764 0.0186 > MultiSource/Applications/hbd/hbd.compile 6.34%...

...i386 PIC -O2: -7.3% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/security-rijndael/Output/security-rijndael -7.2% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/simulator/Output/simulator -5.3% MultiSource/Applications/hexxagon/Output/hexxagon -5.2% MultiSource/Applications/SIBsim4/Output/SIBsim4 -4.8% MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/Output/cfrac -4.1% MultiSource/Applications/d/Output/make_dparser -4.0% MultiSource/Applications/JM/ldecod/Output/ldecod -3.9% External/Nurbs/Output/nurbs -3.7% MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/Output/bc -3.4% MultiSource/Applications/lemon/Output/lemon -3.4% SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc-C++...

Fair enough... The following tests under MultiSource fail: Benchmarks/Olden/power Benchmarks/OptimizerEval Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl Applications/sgefa However, they also fail in the exact same way without my change. OptimizerEval appears to be non-deterministic; it produces different output each time it runs. Everything else passes. I also compared a few *.s files generated by the tests, with and without my change, to s...

...;http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.106=3> 3.49% 0.5011 > 0.5186 0.0007 3.18% 0.0007 > MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.400=3> 3.43% 0.3989 > 0.4126 0.0010 2.41% 0.0010 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.408=3> 3.07% 1.6150 > 1.6645 0.0037 2.68% 0.0037 > MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc > <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.54=3> 3.05% 3.5468 > 3.6550...

...enchmarks/VersaBench/dbms/dbms.compile 7.21% 1.1218 1.2027 0.0173 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo.compile 6.93% 0.8243 0.8814 0.0106 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/office-ispell/office-ispell.compile 6.48% 1.7091 >> 1.8199 0.0047 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac.compile 6.45% 1.0109 1.0761 0.0116 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/ASCI_Purple/SMG2000/smg2000.compile 6.44% 6.6061 7.0314 >> 0.0251 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MiBench/consumer-lame/consumer-lame.compile 6.34% 4.5856 >> 4.8764 0.0186 >> MultiSource/Applications/hb...

...f/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.106=3> 3.49% 0.5011 >> 0.5186 0.0007 3.18% 0.0007 >> MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.400=3> 3.43% 0.3989 >> 0.4126 0.0010 2.41% 0.0010 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.408=3> 3.07% 1.6150 >> 1.6645 0.0037 2.68% 0.0037 >> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc >> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.54=3> 3.05% 3....

...1283/graph?test.106=3> 3.49% 0.5011 >>> 0.5186 0.0007 3.18% 0.0007 >>> MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.400=3> 3.43% 0.3989 >>> 0.4126 0.0010 2.41% 0.0010 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.408=3> 3.07% 1.6150 >>> 1.6645 0.0037 2.68% 0.0037 >>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc >>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.5...

...of expected passes 1189 # of expected failures 34 Regressions Single Source: None New Failures Single Source (new tests): 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit Regressions MultiSource: Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: llc Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: llc, cbe Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit...

Hi, I was just browsing my LNT performance builder and it seems within the last month we managed to increase compile time from 37 to 47 seconds for the bullet benchmark: http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/graph?plot.0=34.274.3&highlight_run=29054 A similar pattern can be seen for MallocBench/gs/gs where we go from 5.3 to 7.4 seconds. http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/graph?plot.0=34.301.3&highlight_run=29054 One contributing patch seems to be the following one (surprisingly): Author: Chandler Carruth <chandlerc at gmail.com> Date: Fri Jun 27 15:13:01 2014 +0000...

Tanya Lattner wrote: > >> 1. I'm still looking for volunteers to test MacOS X and Solaris. >> If you'd like to volunteer, please email the list to let us know. > > > I'll do minimal testing on Sparc. I'm not going to look into any > regressions though since no one has been really watching Sparc since I > graduated and I am sure there are

...3> 3.49% 0.5011 >>>> 0.5186 0.0007 3.18% 0.0007 >>>> MultiSource/Applications/spiff/spiff >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.400=3> 3.43% 0.3989 >>>> 0.4126 0.0010 2.41% 0.0010 >>>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1283/graph?test.408=3> 3.07% 1.6150 >>>> 1.6645 0.0037 2.68% 0.0037 >>>> MultiSource/Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/TimberWolfMC/timberwolfmc >>>> <http://llvm.org/perf/db_default/v4/nts/1...

...ork-dijkstra/network-dijkstra.| 4.41 | 3.85 | 0 | 0 | |SingleSource/Benchmarks/Misc/oourafft.test | 3.50 | 3.46 | 3.58 | 3.58 | |MultiSource/Applications/JM/lencod/lencod.test | 2.67 | 2.30 | 3.03 | 3.03 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso.test | 2.14 | 2.89 | 2.30 | 2.30 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/Olden/bisort/bisort.test | 2.04 | 2.12 | 3.59 | 3.59 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks/DOE-ProxyApps-C++/CLAMR/CLAMR.test | 1.98 | 2.03 | 2.66 | 2.66 | |MultiSource/Benchmarks...

...0.109 0.113 > vars 0.000000 0.000018 > sds 0.000000 0.004279 > result 1.632993 ===================== MultiSource/Benchmarks/FreeBench/mason All fail (including native) with error "Could not open datafile test.in" ===================== MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl None of cbe/jit/llc passed. gccld core dumped: /usr/home/llvm/obj/tools/Debug/llvm-dis Output/perl.linked.rbc -o Output/perl.linked.rll -f /usr/home/llvm/obj/tools/Debug/gccas Output/perl.linked.rll -o Output/perl.linked.bc /usr/home/llvm/obj/tools/Debug/gccld -L/usr/home/llvm/cfrontend/x8...

All, It seems there's been some llvm bit rot on Linux recently. The tester on Zion is getting wedged so it appears to never finish. I experienced the same thing when running the llc compiled version of MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso. It went into an infinite loop. I have just set up a new nightly tester (machine=70) which you can view at: http://llvm.org/nightlytest/test.php?machine=70&night=1247 Last night this test managed to finish but exhibits large numbers of failures. llc-beta fails on every compile. Sev...

...es 34 > > Regressions Single Source: > None > > New Failures Single Source (new tests): > 2005-05-12-Int64ToFP: llc,jit > > Regressions MultiSource: > Applications/d/make_dparser: llc, cbe, jit > Applications/hexxagon/hexxagon: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs: llc, cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/cdecl/cdecl: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/football/football: cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/gnugo/gnugo: llc, cbe, jit > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/agrep/agrep: llc > Benchmarks/Prolangs-C/fixoutput/fixoutput: llc, cbe > Benchmarks/Prolangs...

On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:16:37 -0700 Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 08:52:10 -0700 > Jeff Cohen <jeffc at jolt-lang.org> wrote: > > > > I haven't got around to this yet but I will. The odds are good the > > > problem is in a BSD system header file so I need to capture the > > > preprocessed source. > > >

On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 16:01, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Fair enough... The following tests under MultiSource fail: > > Benchmarks/Olden/power > Benchmarks/OptimizerEval > Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks > Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl > Applications/sgefa > > However, they also fail in the exact same way without my change. > OptimizerEval appears to be non-deterministic; it produces different > output each time it runs. Everything else passes. I also compared a > few *.s files generated by the tests, wi...

...ests on Linux. So, your changes are committed. Thanks for the patches! Reid. On Sun, 2004-08-29 at 16:01, Jeff Cohen wrote: > Fair enough... The following tests under MultiSource fail: > > Benchmarks/Olden/power > Benchmarks/OptimizerEval > Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks > Benchmarks/MallocBench/perl > Applications/sgefa > > However, they also fail in the exact same way without my change. > OptimizerEval appears to be non-deterministic; it produces different > output each time it runs. Everything else passes. I also compared a > few *.s files generated by the tests, wi...

...MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/bc/bc | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/anagram/anagram | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/Ptrdist/ks/ks | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/espresso/espresso | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/gs/gs | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/MallocBench/cfrac/cfrac | * | * | MultiSource/Benchmarks/PAQ8p/paq8p...

Jeff, Chris isn't likely to respond to this for a while as he's on vacation. I'll take a look at it and will commit it if it looks good. Since code gen isn't my specialty, could you increase my comfort level a little by giving me some examples of the test results you got when testing your patches? Ideally, I'd like to see some of the test/Programs/MultiSource programs working