search for: malloc_206

Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "malloc_206".

2007 Feb 13
2
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
Hi, i have some code that allocate some memory, store the pointer to a variable, read it back and deallocates it, like this: int %main(int %argc, ubyte** %argv) { %c_19 = alloca ubyte* %malloc_206 = malloc ubyte, uint 10 store ubyte* %malloc_206, ubyte** %c_19 %tmp_207 = load ubyte** %c_19 free ubyte* %tmp_207 ret int 0 } i expected the optimized to remove everything, but after running it the code i get is: int %main(int %argc, ubyte** %argv) { %malloc_206 = malloc [10 x ubyte] %malloc...
2007 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
...wrote: > Hi, i have some code that allocate some memory, store the pointer to a > variable, read it back and deallocates it, like this: ok > i expected the optimized to remove everything, but after running it > the code i get is: > > int %main(int %argc, ubyte** %argv) { > %malloc_206 = malloc [10 x ubyte] > %malloc_206.sub = getelementptr [10 x ubyte]* %malloc_206, int 0, int 0 > free ubyte* %malloc_206.sub > ret int 0 > } > > Why didn't he optimized it out? This looks like a simple missed optimization. > and where did that getelementptr came from?...
2007 Feb 14
2
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
...some memory, store the pointer to a > > variable, read it back and deallocates it, like this: > > ok > > > i expected the optimized to remove everything, but after running it > > the code i get is: > > > > int %main(int %argc, ubyte** %argv) { > > %malloc_206 = malloc [10 x ubyte] > > %malloc_206.sub = getelementptr [10 x ubyte]* %malloc_206, int 0, int 0 > > free ubyte* %malloc_206.sub > > ret int 0 > > } > > > > Why didn't he optimized it out? > > This looks like a simple missed optimizat...
2007 Feb 14
0
[LLVMdev] Unused malloc/free don't get optimized
...> variable, read it back and deallocates it, like this: > > > > ok > > > > > i expected the optimized to remove everything, but after running it > > > the code i get is: > > > > > > int %main(int %argc, ubyte** %argv) { > > > %malloc_206 = malloc [10 x ubyte] > > > %malloc_206.sub = getelementptr [10 x ubyte]* %malloc_206, int 0, int 0 > > > free ubyte* %malloc_206.sub > > > ret int 0 > > > } > > > > > > Why didn't he optimized it out? > > > > T...