Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "malfeasance".
2004 Dec 29
2
So what if I can't dial out ... or in ... Asterisk just blows my mind!
...hange your message')
exten => 500,6,ResponseTimeout(3)
So I figgered out how to make selected conferences automatically record the
"minutes," and I was SO PSYCHED!!!!
But then I thought, what if I answer the phone and it's my ex-wife claiming
that she's gonna sue me for malfeasance because of my new boyfriend, and I
wanna make a recording of that call? How could I discreetly begin a
recording of that call?
Thanks,
lane
P.S. I don't gotta ex-wife, I'm just saying "what if?"
2015 Jan 19
6
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit
test) and I have some questions.
This IR *matches* and then *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT **is called:*
%and = and i64 %shl, %val * ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; *bit test
with a *register* index
This IR *does not match* and so *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT *...
2015 Jan 19
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
...erated code wrong?
>
> You can give a C file if you are sure that it is reproducible with the
> current clang.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mehdi
>
> On Jan 18, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit
> test) and I have some questions.
>
> This IR *matches* and then *X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT **is called:*
>
> %and = and i64 %shl, %val * ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; *bit
> test with a *register* index
>
>
> This IR *does not matc...
2009 Oct 04
1
offlist Re: AW: Urgently needed Exercise solutions related to PracticalData Analysis Using R Statisctial Software
Accepted and forgotten. It just reminds us to check on our prejudices once
in a while. Also, I realized that my description was not entirely accurate.
You actually had to click the link on the page you posted to get this:
http://www.odesk.com/jobs/College-Assistance_~~dd7622f6bdef9177
I am an MSc. computer science student in a foreign university!
Need help to solve the exercises in the following
2015 Jan 22
2
[LLVMdev] X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT
...>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mehdi
>>>
>>>> On Jan 18, 2015, at 5:13 PM, Chris Sears <chris.sears at gmail.com <mailto:chris.sears at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I'm tracking down an X86 code generation malfeasance regarding BT (bit test) and I have some questions.
>>>>
>>>> This IR matches and then X86TargetLowering::LowerToBT is called:
>>>>
>>>> %and = and i64 %shl, %val ; (val & (1 << index)) != 0 ; bit test with a register index
>>...