search for: malefactor

--- "Paino, Christopher L YN1(AW) (CPF N0084)" <PainoCL@cpf.navy.mil> wrote: > If I am understanding FLAC correctly, the internal MD5 sum is (or can > be > )different than the fingerprint file sum. Yes. > The internal sum can be > different > depending on which compression settings are used, while the audio > remains > unchanged. It's the other way

...print won't change, so there's nothing to be concerned about. However, if the recipient's FLAC files pass flac -t but the fingerprints don't match those on the seeder's site, somebody along the way has changed the underlying WAV data. That's a two-edged sword: it stymies a malefactor from altering the WAVs out of mischief, but it also prevents a music lover from adjusting track marks, declicking, or degapping.

...9;s nothing to be > concerned > about. However, if the recipient's FLAC files pass flac -t but the > fingerprints don't match those on the seeder's site, somebody along > the way > has changed the underlying WAV data. That's a two-edged sword: it > stymies a > malefactor from altering the WAVs out of mischief, but it also > prevents a > music lover from adjusting track marks, declicking, or degapping. I thought once you change the audio it requires a new seed. Josh __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New DSL Internet Access f...

It seems that there are a few camps here: * The scp power users - this camp believes that scp supporting backtick notation is fine and that running arbitrary commands is a perfectly fine thing to do. * The restricted shell users - this camp believes that scp supporting backtick may not be the best, and there are various restricted shells which can prevent this. Power users may belong to this