Displaying 10 results from an estimated 10 matches for "makingllvm".
2005 Oct 13
4
[LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?
...igure-target-libstdc++-v3] Error 1
I am not sure but it looks like a problem with your Cygwin instillation ?
Try a 'make configure' or 'make reconfigure'.
Here's a link to the instructions I developed for building LLVM on Cygwin :-
http://angray.members.beeb.net/llvm/MakingLLVM.html
As far as I know it should hopefully still be correct for the debug build.
It failed on the release build though due to a bug in ld, which hopefully
will be fixed with time.
Aaron
2005 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?
...#39;make configure' or 'make reconfigure'.
Hmmm, I was able to build llvm/tools-only.... As for "make configure" -
that didn't help.
> Here's a link to the instructions I developed for building LLVM on
> Cygwin :-
> http://angray.members.beeb.net/llvm/MakingLLVM.html
Yes, this is a nice, simple to follow digest of the "Bootstrapping the
LLVM C/C++ frontend" document. I've got my own notes, that are
identical to it, except for the paths :) So, yes, that's what I've
been doing.
And yeah, I was able to build a version of LLVM at some st...
2005 May 30
4
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] onsistant error building LLVM
Also, this error:
/usr/src/llvm/lib/Target/X86/X86ISelPattern.cpp:73: undefined reference
to `X86CompilationCallback2'
doesn't make sense. X86CompilationCallback2 is not visible outside of
X86JITInfo.cpp, and line 73 of X86ISelPattern.cpp is in the middle of a
comment block.
2005 May 30
1
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] onsistant error building LLVM
Here's the instructions as I have them so far :-
http://angray.members.beeb.net/llvm/MakingLLVM.html
I was wondering whether you could look them over to see if I am doing
something obviously wrong.
Thanks,
Aaron
2005 May 30
0
[LLVMdev] [Cygwin] onsistant error building LLVM
Sure, but not right now. I need to go out for a bit. I'll look at them
tonight.
Reid.
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 20:41 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
> Here's the instructions as I have them so far :-
>
> http://angray.members.beeb.net/llvm/MakingLLVM.html
>
> I was wondering whether you could look them over to see if I am doing
> something obviously wrong.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Aaron
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LLVM Developers mailing list
> LLVMdev at cs.uiuc.edu http://ll...
2005 Oct 13
1
[LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?
...'make reconfigure'.
> Hmmm, I was able to build llvm/tools-only.... As for "make configure" -
> that didn't help.
>
>> Here's a link to the instructions I developed for building LLVM on
>> Cygwin :-
>> http://angray.members.beeb.net/llvm/MakingLLVM.html
> Yes, this is a nice, simple to follow digest of the "Bootstrapping the
> LLVM C/C++ frontend" document. I've got my own notes, that are
> identical to it, except for the paths :) So, yes, that's what I've
> been doing.
Looks nice. Would you guys be interes...
2005 May 25
2
[LLVMdev] LLVM Cygwin Run Errors
Hi,
I am wondering whether the bytecode generated by my llvm-gcc is correct?
When I run
$ llvm-gcc hello.c -o hello
What I get is hello.exe.bc, and hello.exe (I can actually llvm-dis the
bytecode file which is hello.exe.bc).
However, I do not get a shell script(named hello) as stated in the
documentation...
Best Regards,
Kiat
On 5/25/05, Aaron Gray <angray at beeb.net> wrote:
>
2005 Oct 13
0
[LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?
Hello Aaron,
Aaron Gray wrote on 14/10/2005 at 5:50 a.m.:
>> Also, it would be really nice if an official cygwin build (the
>> binary) was published too. I spent quite a bit of time screwing
>> with it a few months ago, and it was quite a bastard to get
>> going...
> I had quite a time with it too, could only get the debug version to
> build as there seemed to be an
2005 Oct 13
2
[LLVMdev] Next LLVM release thoughts?
> Also, it would be really nice if an official
> cygwin build (the binary) was published too. I spent quite a bit of
> time screwing with it a few months ago, and it was quite a bastard to
> get going...
I had quite a time with it too, could only get the debug version to build as
there seemed to be an internal problem with ld.
I would very interested in how you got it running and
2005 Oct 30
3
[LLVMdev] Still can't compile backend or frontend on Windows
It's a shame this fine tool can't get better installation support for
Windows. If it did I suspect it would get a lot more coverage. After
5 months or so I still have no way to compile the backend tools let
alone the C frontend on windows. I have tried both Cygwin and Mingw so
far. MingW is preferrable since distributions of the binaries would not
require the cygwin.dll. It