search for: majf

...00 io=3095.70 clat (usec) max=3484.10 avg=121085.38 stdev=174416.11 min=0.00 clat (usec) max=3438.30 avg=59863.35 stdev=116607.69 min=0.00 clat (usec) max=3745.65 avg=454501.30 stdev=332699.00 min=0.00 clat (usec) max=4089.75 avg=442374.99 stdev=304874.62 min=0.00 cpu sys=615.12 majf=24080.50 ctx=64253616.50 usr=68.08 minf=17907363.00 cpu sys=1235.95 majf=23389.00 ctx=59788148.00 usr=98.34 minf=20020008.50 cpu sys=764.96 majf=28414.00 ctx=848279274.00 usr=36.39 minf=19737254.00 cpu sys=714.13 majf=21853.50 ctx=854608972.00 usr=33.56 minf=18256760.50 with unlocked k...

...00 io=3095.70 clat (usec) max=3484.10 avg=121085.38 stdev=174416.11 min=0.00 clat (usec) max=3438.30 avg=59863.35 stdev=116607.69 min=0.00 clat (usec) max=3745.65 avg=454501.30 stdev=332699.00 min=0.00 clat (usec) max=4089.75 avg=442374.99 stdev=304874.62 min=0.00 cpu sys=615.12 majf=24080.50 ctx=64253616.50 usr=68.08 minf=17907363.00 cpu sys=1235.95 majf=23389.00 ctx=59788148.00 usr=98.34 minf=20020008.50 cpu sys=764.96 majf=28414.00 ctx=848279274.00 usr=36.39 minf=19737254.00 cpu sys=714.13 majf=21853.50 ctx=854608972.00 usr=33.56 minf=18256760.50 with unlocked k...

Hi, Jens & Rusty This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and writethrough' patch. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a user. Jens, could you please

Hi, Jens & Rusty This version is rebased against linux-next which resolves the conflict with Paolo Bonzini's 'virtio-blk: allow toggling host cache between writeback and writethrough' patch. Patch 1/3 and 2/3 applies on linus's master as well. Since Rusty will pick up patch 3/3 so the changes to block core (adding blk_bio_map_sg()) will have a user. Jens, could you please

Hi, all Changes in v7: - Using vbr->flags to trace request type - Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter - Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function - Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential

Hi, all Changes in v7: - Using vbr->flags to trace request type - Dropped unnecessary struct virtio_blk *vblk parameter - Reuse struct virtblk_req in bio done function - Added performance data on normal SATA device and the reason why make it optional Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential

...28MB, bw=21,046KB/s, iops=5,261, runt= 6243msec slat (usec): min=4, max=11,678, avg=164.73, stdev=442.99 clat (usec): min=11, max=19,552, avg=2229.92, stdev=1367.33 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=24448, per=2.03%, avg=3402.15, stdev=7878.23 cpu : usr=0.35%, sys=18.66%, ctx=6023, majf=0, minf=25 IO depths : 1=0.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=87.5%, >=64=12.5% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=100.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued r/w: total=98224/32848, shor...

...28MB, bw=21,046KB/s, iops=5,261, runt= 6243msec slat (usec): min=4, max=11,678, avg=164.73, stdev=442.99 clat (usec): min=11, max=19,552, avg=2229.92, stdev=1367.33 bw (KB/s) : min= 0, max=24448, per=2.03%, avg=3402.15, stdev=7878.23 cpu : usr=0.35%, sys=18.66%, ctx=6023, majf=0, minf=25 IO depths : 1=0.0%, 2=0.0%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=87.5%, >=64=12.5% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=0.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=100.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued r/w: total=98224/32848, shor...

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% 2) Fusion IO device With bio-based IO path, sequential

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% 2) Fusion IO device With bio-based IO path, sequential

Hi, all This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%,

Hi, all This version reworked on REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and dropped the block core bits since Jens has picked them up. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk device With bio-based IO path, sequential read/write, random read/write IOPS boost : 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% Latency improvement: 32%,

Hi folks, This version added REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and rebased against latest linus's tree. Jens, could you please consider picking up the dependencies 1/4 and 2/4 in your tree. Thanks! This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk

Hi folks, This version added REQ_FLUSH and REQ_FUA support as suggested by Christoph and rebased against latest linus's tree. Jens, could you please consider picking up the dependencies 1/4 and 2/4 in your tree. Thanks! This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows bio-based IO path gives the following performance improvement: 1) Ramdisk

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (2): block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (2): block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk block/blk-merge.c | 63 ++++++++++++++

...r 20 15:05:23 2018 write: IOPS=4443, BW=17.4MiB/s (18.2MB/s)(256MiB/14748msec) bw ( KiB/s): min=16384, max=19184, per=99.92%, avg=17760.45, stdev=602.48, samples=29 iops : min= 4096, max= 4796, avg=4440.07, stdev=150.66, samples=29 cpu : usr=4.00%, sys=18.02%, ctx=131097, majf=0, minf=7 IO depths : 1=0.1%, 2=0.1%, 4=0.1%, 8=0.1%, 16=0.1%, 32=100.0%, >=64=0.0% submit : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.0%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% complete : 0=0.0%, 4=100.0%, 8=0.0%, 16=0.0%, 32=0.1%, 64=0.0%, >=64=0.0% issued rwt: total=0,65536,0, short=0...

On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Sam McLeod <mailinglists at smcleod.net> wrote: > Hi Raghavendra, > > > On 20 Mar 2018, at 1:55 pm, Raghavendra Gowdappa <rgowdapp at redhat.com> > wrote: > > Aggregating large number of small writes by write-behind into large writes > has been merged on master: > https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/issues/364 > >

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (3): block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk

This patchset implements bio-based IO path for virito-blk to improve performance. Fio test shows it gives, 28%, 24%, 21%, 16% IOPS boost and 32%, 17%, 21%, 16% latency improvement for sequential read/write, random read/write respectively. Asias He (3): block: Introduce __blk_segment_map_sg() helper block: Add blk_bio_map_sg() helper virtio-blk: Add bio-based IO path for virtio-blk