Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "maintscript".
Did you mean:
main_script
2017 Mar 03
0
Configuration problem installing backport to jessie
...slightly
> wrong with respect to bash completion.
Somehow the R 3.3.2 package deletes /etc/bash_completion.d/R before it tries
to move it. Then, if you select to keep your current version, this current
version is empty which leads to the error.
According to the changelog, debian/r-base-core.maintscript was introduced to
fix
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840506
It seems that the interaction of the maintscript and dh_bash-completion is
error-prone. Admins should not be bothered by a question about bash completion
when they did not touch the configuration.
On the other hand...
2017 Mar 02
5
Configuration problem installing backport to jessie
I came across this problem moving from the standard jessie package to
the backport:
$ sudo dpkg --configure r-base-core
Setting up r-base-core (3.3.2-1~jessiecran.0) ...
Preserving user changes to /usr/share/bash-completion/completions/R (renamed from /etc/bash_completion.d/R)...
mv: cannot stat ?/usr/share/bash-completion/completions/R?: No such file or directory
dpkg:
2017 Mar 03
1
Configuration problem installing backport to jessie
On 3 March 2017 at 08:51, Johannes Ranke wrote:
| "Deleted (by you or by a script) since installation" points to a packaging
| problem, as I have not touched anything in this installation. Indeed, there is
| no file /etc/bash_completion.d/R in the system.
The default location for these files changed, I finally complied.
But nobody tests this for backports -- so if you or Jim could
2019 Feb 10
21
[PATCH 00/13] Patch blast of salsa wip.testme branch
The contents are the wip.testme branch currently on salsa. I combined
the wip.initscript and wip.oxenstored into this and added more things
today. I think this is pretty gtg and it's smoke tested (in several
cases by scping files around instead of doing package build), so it
needs a final extra review and test round before putting it in master
branch (which I don't want to force push).
I
2020 Jul 17
2
Upgrading LLVM's minimum required CMake version
What about helping the user: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83995 ?
(can also improve the detection to point at the apt repo on Ubuntu if
needed)
--
Mehdi
On Thu, Jul 16, 2020 at 6:21 PM James Y Knight via llvm-dev <
llvm-dev at lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Please, no more waiting on CMake versions in distro LTS releases. We have
> been *way* too conservative already, waiting this long.
2013 Jan 26
0
Processed: switching email address
...9;docbookwiki'
Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>'
Warning: Unknown package 'docbookwiki'
> submitter 657735 !
Bug #657735 [piuparts] reference examples for 'problematic' maintscript tasks
Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.org>' from 'Andreas Beckmann <debian at abeckmann.de>'
> submitter 668448 !
Bug #668448 [olvwm] olvwm: leaves alternatives after purge
Changed Bug submitter to 'Andreas Beckmann <anbe at debian.or...