search for: maintainc

In production ( hosted in dreamhost) during migratin , I want send the users to a maintaince page. Is there any standard way of doing this. Rgds, --Siva Jagadeesan http://www.varcasa.com/ My First Rails Project. Powered by Typo and soon by RForum too -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://wrath.rubyonrails.org/pipermail/rails/attachments/2...

...public and private and having a common branch for > fixes would be very beneficial and save everyone a lot of work. Plus, > I think it would give users with private forks of LLVM an incentive to > contribute changes back to the project. Having a single branch doesn't work as soon as maintaince for releases comes into the game. Consider FreeBSD 10 shipping with Clang 3.3 and FreeBSD 11 with Clang 3.4... Joerg

...aving a common branch for > > fixes would be very beneficial and save everyone a lot of work. Plus, > > I think it would give users with private forks of LLVM an incentive to > > contribute changes back to the project. > > Having a single branch doesn't work as soon as maintaince for releases > comes into the game. Consider FreeBSD 10 shipping with Clang 3.3 and > FreeBSD 11 with Clang 3.4... > Of course, what I meant was there should be one branch per version of clang/llvm. I thought the suggestion was that there should be a NetBSD branch, a FreeBSD branch, an...

...> > > fixes would be very beneficial and save everyone a lot of work. Plus, > > > I think it would give users with private forks of LLVM an incentive to > > > contribute changes back to the project. > > > > Having a single branch doesn't work as soon as maintaince for releases > > comes into the game. Consider FreeBSD 10 shipping with Clang 3.3 and > > FreeBSD 11 with Clang 3.4... > > > > Of course, what I meant was there should be one branch per version of > clang/llvm. I thought the suggestion was that there should be a NetBS...

Hi All, Just a quick question: Will 3.3.x replace 3.2.x as the production use branch? We're still using 3.0.28 and up on our systems and just want to know if evaluating 3.2 is the right step, or wait for 3.3. Thanks, Jim Shanks

Hello Linus Torvalds, Paul Davis, The state of most desktop and office applications under Linux seem quite healthy. People are working hard making the Linux desktop work. Yet, I am very sorry, but I cannot describe the deployment and maintaince of 3D graphics and sound API's as well as drivers as anything other than woeful. My hope is an enviroment where both open-source and commcial audio applications, 3D graphic applications and 3D games can all flurish. The Linux kernal is often updated and patched for security reasons. The m...

...th a 4 port sangoma card (A104D) in the first 2 systems, and digium T410P cards in the other 5. GBLX numbers their spans from 0 to 3 instead of 1-4 and we have a NFAS configuration with the d-channel on chan 96. All of our systems are running 1.0.7 for stability reasons (and no good time for maintaince, the entire platform is used most of the day) but if an upgrade will help us, we'll schedule it soon. We've recently been experiencing people not being able to get in. We have a hunt group tied in over our 7 trunks which will roll them if a trunk is busy or out of order. It seems tha...

...icipated, but I have finally finished the next release of the survival code. Primary changes 1. The source has been migrated to Rforge. This will now be the primary source. I've used SCCS -> rcs -> cvs and now svn. Further changes will be someone else's problem. I expect that maintaince will now begin to migrate to a larger group and my role diminish; I hope to focus more energy on coxme. I tried to carry forward the entire history of the package. In the current US software copyright mess we might one day have to use that long history. I think I started the SCCS tree in arou...

On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 07:09:47PM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote: > Hi all, > I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like to discuss > in the greater context of the mailing list. NetBSD is about to import > LLVM and Clang into its repository; FreeBSD already has done that a > while ago. This creates some interesting maintainance questions. FreeBSD > has

Hi! I've been using Dovecot for one single Domain with SSL certificates. Now I would like to use Dovecot with several Domains and proper SSL certificates. I tried to setup TLS SNI but it does not work. What I basically did was just adding local_name imap.samsoft.at { ssl_cert = </etc/ssl/private/mailserver/imap.samsoft.at.crt ssl_key =

Hi all, I mentioned this idea yesterday on IRC already and would like to discuss in the greater context of the mailing list. NetBSD is about to import LLVM and Clang into its repository; FreeBSD already has done that a while ago. This creates some interesting maintainance questions. FreeBSD has followed the LLVM/Clang releases and backported various fixes locally. NetBSD will after the 3.4 release

...and Samba 2.0, so this deprecation applies to DOS and similar era clients. We do reassure that that 'simple' operation of older clients than these (eg DOS) will, while untested, continue for the near future, our purpose is not to cripple use of Samba in unique situations, but to reduce the maintaince burden. Eventually SMB1 as a whole will be removed, but no broader change is announced for 4.16. In the rare case where the above changes cause incompatibilities, users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for share...

...and Samba 2.0, so this deprecation applies to DOS and similar era clients. We do reassure that that 'simple' operation of older clients than these (eg DOS) will, while untested, continue for the near future, our purpose is not to cripple use of Samba in unique situations, but to reduce the maintaince burden. Eventually SMB1 as a whole will be removed, but no broader change is announced for 4.16. In the rare case where the above changes cause incompatibilities, users requiring support for these features will need to use older versions of Samba. No longer using Linux mandatory locks for share...

Aloha! (I've Googled around a bit, but failed to find much previous posts about this though I'm sure it has been discussed...) Have anybody (in core etc) considered adding a sudo implementation to thr FreeBSD base system. At least for me, sudo is an important part of implementing good security policy in FreeBSD. Yes, it is available as a port, but in a similar fashion of for example,

I believe both mailing lists are great but there are so may postings that many issues get missed. There are some bugs that hand never been resolved because developers are unaware of it. I just setup forum for xen users at sam.hebe.us/forums please be free to join _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

I believe both mailing lists are great but there are so may postings that many issues get missed. There are some bugs that hand never been resolved because developers are unaware of it. I just setup forum for xen users at sam.hebe.us/forums please be free to join _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-users

hello, I am absolutely new, means from non-IT sector but have attraction (developed recently) towards linux and have chosen the centos distro for the installation as an OS in my home PC for personal use. I went to the page: http://isoredirect.centos.org/centos/5/isos/i386/ But don't understand amongst the variety of options there. I also don't know the technical terms like md5,

...hy not to have sudo(1) in our base is that: - It is actively maintained and generally speaking it won't be hard to build/install from ports collection. - It provides another way of utilizing privileges, and needs careful configuration. - We do not have a killer application to ease maintaince of the configuration (yet). The reasons why it can be in our base is that: + It is cool because fine grained access to the privilege is possible, and it is the tool that I will want to install on every boxes. + It's BSD licensed So my position would be neutral. Personally I woul...

Friends, We have a discussion on asterisk-dev about the maintenance of the 1.4 branch. According to the release plans, support for 1.4 was scheduled to close in April 2011 - basically now. After that, only security patches would be committed. This is already a delay from the original plan published by Russell Bryant. Unfortunately, I think this is way too early. My feeling and experience is that