search for: mainshare

...$] # comment = Printer Drivers # path = /var/lib/samba/drivers # write list = @ntadmin root # force group = ntadmin # create mask = 0664 # directory mask = 0775 [nobackup] comment = nobackup inherit acls = Yes path = /data/nobackup read only = No valid users = mainshare @it @webdev create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 [it] comment = IT inherit acls = Yes path = /data/IT/IT-share read only = No valid users = @it force group = it create mask = 0664 directory mask = 0775 ## recycle bin config ## vfs objects =...

...c/samba/command.pl > change share command=/etc/samba/command.pl > > [camshare] > comment = Camera data share > path = /home/camshare > read only = No > writeable = Yes > inherit owner = Yes > guest ok = No > > [mainshare] > comment = Main Fileshare > path = /home/mainshare > read only = No > writeable = Yes > inherit owner = Yes > guest ok = Yes > > vfs objects = recycle extd_audit > recycle:repository = Recycle Bin >...

...ng, adding and deleting files, but anytime a mac user touches a folder or creates a new one, it gets restricted to just their own use This is a Debian 5 system with Samba 3.2.5, the mac's are all running OSX 10.5.x Relevant share info # read/write area on server (accessible to all users) [mainshare] browseable = yes writable = yes path = /srv/samba/mainshare comment = All User Access valid users = @users force group = users force create mode = 0660 force directory mode = 0771 Using any of the other mask or directory options in...

...;>> comment = Camera data share >>>> path = /home/camshare >>>> read only = No >>>> writeable = Yes >>>> inherit owner = Yes >>>> guest ok = No >>>> >>>> [mainshare] >>>> comment = Main Fileshare >>>> path = /home/mainshare >>>> read only = No >>>> writeable = Yes >>>> inherit owner = Yes >>>> guest ok = Yes >>>> >>&...

Is it possible to have a share within a share, or to force group on directories within a share? What I am trying to do is set up departmental shares, but find that having them all in the root list of shares looks messy (too many shares :P ) What would be preferable, would be to have a [departments] share, then put a share for each department within that share. Just using directories within