search for: mailbox_list_index_nod

...;info.flags |= MAILBOX_NONEXISTENT; } if ((node->flags & MAILBOX_LIST_INDEX_FLAG_NONEXISTENT) != 0) ctx->info.flags |= MAILBOX_NONEXISTENT; @@ -126,6 +131,14 @@ mailbox_list_index_update_next(struct mailbox_list_index_iterate_context *ctx, { struct mailbox_list_index_node *node = ctx->next_node; + if (!ctx->prefix_inbox_list && ctx->ctx.list->ns->prefix_len > 0 && + strcmp(node->name, "INBOX") == 0 && node->parent == NULL && + node->children != NULL) { + /*...

...> } > if ((node->flags & MAILBOX_LIST_INDEX_FLAG_NONEXISTENT) != 0) > ctx->info.flags |= MAILBOX_NONEXISTENT; > @@ -126,6 +131,14 @@ mailbox_list_index_update_next(struct > mailbox_list_index_iterate_context *ctx, > { > struct mailbox_list_index_node *node = ctx->next_node; > > + if (!ctx->prefix_inbox_list && ctx->ctx.list->ns->prefix_len > 0 > && > + strcmp(node->name, "INBOX") == 0 && node->parent == NULL && > + node->children != NU...

...x->info.flags |= MAILBOX_NONEXISTENT; </div> <div> @@ -126,6 +131,14 @@ mailbox_list_index_update_next(struct mailbox_list_index_iterate_context *ctx, </div> <div> { </div> <div> struct mailbox_list_index_node *node = ctx->next_node; </div> <div> <br> </div> <div> + if (!ctx->prefix_inbox_list && ctx->ctx.list->ns->prefix_len > 0 && </div> <div> +...

Just hoping to get some dev eyes on this. I'm incredibly reluctant to throw the word 'bug' around (since 99 times out of 100, it's not -- it's almost always the config), but I can't think of any way that this could be a config issue, esp when the pre-2.2.34 version works as expected. I noticed during troubleshooting that dovecot errors out if I try to create a subfolder