search for: mail_index_transaction_lookup

Aug 18 22:07:31 twosheds IMAP(dwmw2): : Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c: line 637 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) * PREAUTH [CAPABILITY IMAP4rev1 LITERAL+ SASL-IR LOGIN-REFERRALS ID ENABLE SORT SORT=DISPLAY THREAD=REFERENCES THREAD=REFS MULTIAPPEND UNSELECT IDLE CHILDREN NAMESPACE UIDPLUS LIST-EXTENDED I18NLEVEL=1...

...3e8892cf-19dc51309fc2f3527e31000044c1c7e7-b55eb9176ca1b350e565000094b229f9-30810[base64:19 b/l]) failed: Stream is larger than expected (163244 > 163243, eof=1) dsync(user1): Error: copy: i_stream_read() failed: Invalid argument dsync(user1): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 19 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) dsync(user1): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x6889a) [0x7f58a95a189a] -> /usr/local/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(default_fatal_handler+0x32) [0x7f58a95a19a2] -> /usr/loca...

Hi guys, Anyone know what this error with deliver is (v1.1.1)? 2008-07-03T09:45:19+01:00 mail4 deliver(alexander): Panic: file mail-index-transaction.c: line 642 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) Seen a few of these this morning. Mark -- Mark Zealey -- Shared Hosting Team Leader Product Development * Webfusion 123-reg.co.uk, webfusion.co.uk, donhost.co.uk, supanames.co.uk This mail is subject to...

Heya, We are occasionally seeing core dumps with dovecot 2.2.10, which are mostly like this: Jan 11 18:31:08 hostname dovecot: imap(username): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 19 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) Jan 11 18:31:08 hostname dovecot: imap(username): Error: Raw backtrace: /opt/dovecot-2.2.10/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x2b657523aa3a] -> /opt/dovecot-2.2.10/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x2b657523aa...

...le /srv/vmail/s109487/mail/.imap/GS Drehbuch 1/dovecot.index.cache: Broken physical size for mail UID 42 dsync(s109487): Error: mail parser: read(/srv/vmail/s109487/mail/GS Drehbuch 1, box=GS Drehbuch 1) failed: Invalid argument dsync(s109487): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 19 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) dsync(s109487): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib64/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0 [0x332ea6722a] -> /usr/lib64/dovecot/ Thanks and regards . G?tz -- G?tz Reinicke IT-Koordinator Tel. +49 7141 969 82 420 Fa...

I've got this in my logfile, should I worry? May 19 14:45:04 imap(liscia_mcs): Panic: file mail-index-transaction-update.c: line 19 (mail_index_transaction_lookup): assertion failed: (seq >= t->first_new_seq && seq <= t->last_new_seq) May 19 14:45:04 imap(liscia_mcs): Error: Raw backtrace: /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x9cd16) [0xb7568d16] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot.so.0(+0x9cd9f) [0xb7568d9f] -> /usr/lib/dovecot/libdovecot...

http://dovecot.org/test/ Well, remember when I said: > Here you go, maildir syncing problems finally fixed (I hope). Well, > except there's this "new-dir-only syncing" optimization which I'm not > really sure if it works as it should. Just before I found the expunge bug in index, I was trying to fix the new-dir-only syncing because the code looked wrong. Then I