Displaying 20 results from an estimated 101 matches for "mail_cache_fields".
2004 Oct 26
1
Cache fields
Using 1.0-test51, or maybe test50. I this message in syslog:
mail_cache_fields: Invalid cache field name 'MessagePart', ignoring
>From the what I see, MessagePart is the default value. My
<sysconfdir>/dovecot.conf has:
mail_cache_fields = MessagePart
Thanks, Alex
2003 Apr 22
1
index files
hi,
what's happend if I change the index type ie. change it back to the default
# mail_cache_fields
while before I use
mail_cache_fields =
and restart dovecot? in this case at the next login the index files are
regenerated?
--
Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
2006 Sep 26
1
Cache fields
Hi,
We are using Dovecot with maildir, and the mail client requests flags, internaldate, and uid for all messages on folder open, which on average takes 3 seconds, but for large folders is much longer.
It seems like I want mail_cache_fields to include "flags", but which date corresponds to internaldate? date.received?
Is UID always cached for messages, or does it have to read through the directory to get them? Are there other optimizations I can do that will improve the speed of folder opens?
--
Anthony Kay
University Com...
2015 Mar 19
2
fast doveadm search results
...Ubuntu 14.04 running on OpenVZ containers with 2 Director and 2 imap/pop3 backends.
The storage is shared via NFS. Is this the performance problem? If dovecot has metadata I want in its cache, I cannot see how this is a problem.
Can these settings be useful for my case?
mail_always_cache_fields =
mail_cache_fields = flags
mail_cache_min_mail_count = 0
mail_never_cache_fields = imap.envelope
Thanks.
2005 Apr 09
2
Trying to allocate 0 bytes in index-mail-headers.c
Here's a new one. It just started with the latest (April 8) CVS
version.
In index-mail-headers.c, line 622:
fields = t_new(struct mail_cache_field, count);
count is 0
I'm seeing this with several mailboxes. We're using mbox.
Here's the error message and backtrace.
dovecot: Apr 09 10:53:18 Error: 3348 IMAP(chairman): Trying to allocate 0 bytes
dovecot: Apr 09
2005 Jun 14
3
dovecot.index.cache 1/3rd of INBOX size
...my dovecot.index.cache file has got very large (24MB,
which is more than 1/3 of my INBOX size). I've tried deleting (well,
renaming) the dovecot.index.* files, and re-opening my INBOX, and the
new dovecot.index.cache is only 90KB so far.
I'm using dovecot-1.0-stable and mbox format. My mail_cache_fields and
mail_never_cache_fields are set to the default.
Looking back in the list archives, I found a message from Timo that
suggested the cache entries are created for each message when the
indexes are created, rather than when each message is accessed, so it
ought not to grow? What happens when a...
2023 Feb 22
1
Flags/tags lost when moving e-mails to another folder
...7.<HOSTNAME>", "/home/test/Maildir/.test/cur/1672326456.M737813P15507.<HOSTNAME>,S=2498,W=2551:2,S") = 0
15507 unlink("/home/test/Maildir/cur/1672326270.M619318P11927.<HOSTNAME>,S=2498,W=2551:2,Sa") = 0
Setting mbox_lazy_writes to yes and/or unsetting
mail_cache_fields doesn't change anything.
Any idea of what I am missing? Could this be a bug in Dovecot?
Thanks in advance,
--
Alexis Ben Miloud--Josselin <abenmiloud at evolix.fr>
Evolix - H?bergement et Infog?rance Open Source
Marseille (37 rue Guibal, P?le M?dia, 13003) / Paris / Montr?al
http://ev...
2018 Jul 18
3
doveadm expunge didn't clear Trash mailbox
And here is mine. All dates are todays!
# doveadm -f tab fetch -u test at example.org "uid date.saved" mailbox Trash
uid date.saved
6829 2018-07-18 06:04:50
6830 2018-07-18 11:10:13
6831 2018-07-18 16:16:15
6832 2018-07-18 16:16:15
6833 2018-07-18 08:22:55
6834 2018-07-18 16:16:15
6835 2018-07-18 08:47:10
6836 2018-07-18 09:12:11
6837 2018-07-18 09:53:31
6838 2018-07-18 11:03:31
SNIP a
2012 Nov 08
3
Mails don't get deleted after POP3
...128
login_max_connections: 256
valid_chroot_dirs:
mail_chroot:
max_mail_processes: 512
mail_max_userip_connections: 10
verbose_proctitle: no
first_valid_uid: 500
last_valid_uid: 0
first_valid_gid: 1
last_valid_gid: 0
mail_access_groups:
mail_privileged_group: mail
mail_uid:
mail_gid:
mail_location:
mail_cache_fields:
mail_never_cache_fields: imap.envelope
mail_cache_min_mail_count: 0
mailbox_idle_check_interval: 30
mail_debug: no
mail_full_filesystem_access: no
mail_max_keyword_length: 50
mail_save_crlf: no
mmap_disable: no
dotlock_use_excl: yes
fsync_disable: no
mail_nfs_storage: no
mail_nfs_index: no
mailbox...
2014 Dec 05
0
speed up doveadm search
...you tell me if I speed up search on our maildir storage?
I have no idea if I must manually (or with cron) run "doveadm index" on all our accounts because index/cache is only generated when users access their mailboxes.
Or do I have to tune some settings like : mail_always_cache_fields, mail_cache_fields, mail_cache_min_mail_count, mail_never_cache_fields
Thanks
2015 Mar 19
0
fast doveadm search results
...h: SHA1
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Vu Ngoc VU wrote:
> My goal is to be able to find mails quickly with "doveadm search".
What information you are search for? Message-ID, subject, body text?
If your data is in the headers, check out:
doveconf -a|grep -i cache
mail_always_cache_fields =
mail_cache_fields = flags
mail_cache_min_mail_count = 0
mail_never_cache_fields = imap.envelope
e.g. put message-id into mail_always_cache_fields
- From http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-cvs/2013-May/023261.html
lib-storage: Allow mail_*cache_fields settings to specify any hdr.* fields
- --
Steffen Kaiser
--...
2018 Mar 19
2
Controlling dovecot caching decisions
Hello,
It looks like the "mail_always_cache_fields" and "mail_never_cache_fields"
can be used to control dovecot's caching decisions. I cannot seem to find
any documentation regarding how these fields should be used.
What are acceptable values for these fields? I am quite new to this so any
help would be much appreciated.
Regards,
Siva
-------------- next part
2018 Mar 21
0
dovecot caching decisions
Hello guys,
Should the following configuration:
mail_cache_fields = flags,imap.body,imap.bodystructure
mail_always_cache_fields = imap.body,imap.bodystructure
have an effect on the following command?
doveadm index -u bob INBOX
It seems to have no effect for some reason.
Regards,
Siva
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed......
2018 Jul 19
0
doveadm expunge didn't clear Trash mailbox
...ted issue several years back, starting with
https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March/134706.html
I'm not sure how I got over this and got usable "date.saved" cache values,
and why it stopped working. Maybe I need to set something like
mail_always_cache_fields = date.saved
mail_cache_fields = date.saved
to force date.saved to be cached.
On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Sophie Loewenthal wrote:
> And here is mine. All dates are todays!
>
> # doveadm -f tab fetch -u test at example.org "uid date.saved" mailbox Trash
> uid date.saved
> 6829 2018-07-18 06:04:50
> 6830 2...
2007 Feb 01
0
Mail Answered status flag in pine stopped working in rc19
...The Answered
flag worked properly in dovecot 0.99, but after upgrading to 1.0rc19 it
stopped working. Interestingly, mail that was answered before upgrading
to rc19 still shows the proper flag.
I have tried with mbox_dirty_syncs turned on and off and I have tried
putting "flags" in mail_cache_fields. Obviously I am wandering in the
dark.
Here is the setup:
pine 4.64
dovecot 1.0rc19 (installed from rpm dovecot-1.0-2_40.rc19.el4.at.i386.rpm)
Centos 4.4.2
x86
mail_location =
mbox:~/mail/:INBOX=%h/.mailspool/%u:INDEX=/var/dovecot_indexes\/%d/%n
Inbox is NFS mounted, INDEX is on local disk...
2003 Apr 16
2
0.99.9-test5
...p crashing in POP3 server
- Several fixes to opening index file which needs to be rebuilt. Before
it didn't always rebuild the index but just fallbacked to using only
memory, and that could have been quite slow since all mails in the
mailbox were opened and parsed.
- If there's nothing in mail_cache_fields, index rebuilding doesn't open
the file anymore. This should make in-memory indexes a lot faster than
before, but it could also mean some performance hits later. If client
wants to fetch all mails from the mailbox, the same thing has to be done
anyway.. This needs more thinking actually what is...
2004 Jun 18
1
Info: Internal login failure:
...in_process_size = 16
login_process_per_connection = yes
login_processes_count = 3
login_max_processes_count = 128
login_max_logging_users = 256
login = pop3
max_mail_processes = 1024
verbose_proctitle = no
first_valid_uid = 500
#last_valid_uid = 0
default_mail_env = maildir:/home/mail/%d/%n/Maildir
mail_cache_fields = MessagePart
client_workarounds = oe6-fetch-no-newmail:outlook-idle:
mailbox_check_interval = 300
mailbox_idle_check_interval = 30
mail_save_crlf = yes
mail_read_mmaped = no
maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = yes
mbox_locks = dotlock fcntl
mbox_read_dotlock = yes
mbox_lock_timeout = 120
mbox_dotlock_ch...
2004 Jul 30
1
1.0-test32
http://dovecot.org/test/
Ok, another one. Fixes somewhat rare crashes with transaction log. mbox
won't deadlock anymore. read-only mboxes work finally .. I hope .. and
then the one compilation fix in lib-ntlm.
Updated the Dovecot serving public mailing list archives, hopefully
this version stays working instead of just returning internal error
after a while.
-------------- next part
2005 May 20
1
Stability
I am currently using Dovecot 0.99.14-r1 as provided by Gentoo, in a Qmail +
VPopmail configuration. I am curious as to how to configure it to ensure the
most stability, as it serves >1000 clients. I would rather disable any
indexing that give small speed improvements if they are not known to be
stable.
Advice?
Cheers,
--
Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info
cshobe at
2004 Dec 24
2
Deleting a message through IMAP
I have been having a problem with the test releases...I am now using Test 59. When
I delete a message using SquirrelMail (IMAP) the message stays in the message
list....but you can't open it anymore because it can't be found, if I logout and log
back in...the message is gone from the list. I thought it could be a problem with
the cache, so I added
mail_never_cache_fields = MessagePart