search for: mail_cache_fields

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 101 matches for "mail_cache_fields".

2004 Oct 26
1
Cache fields
Using 1.0-test51, or maybe test50. I this message in syslog: mail_cache_fields: Invalid cache field name 'MessagePart', ignoring >From the what I see, MessagePart is the default value. My <sysconfdir>/dovecot.conf has: mail_cache_fields = MessagePart Thanks, Alex
2003 Apr 22
1
index files
hi, what's happend if I change the index type ie. change it back to the default # mail_cache_fields while before I use mail_cache_fields = and restart dovecot? in this case at the next login the index files are regenerated? -- Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!"
2006 Sep 26
1
Cache fields
Hi, We are using Dovecot with maildir, and the mail client requests flags, internaldate, and uid for all messages on folder open, which on average takes 3 seconds, but for large folders is much longer. It seems like I want mail_cache_fields to include "flags", but which date corresponds to internaldate? date.received? Is UID always cached for messages, or does it have to read through the directory to get them? Are there other optimizations I can do that will improve the speed of folder opens? -- Anthony Kay University Com...
2015 Mar 19
2
fast doveadm search results
...Ubuntu 14.04 running on OpenVZ containers with 2 Director and 2 imap/pop3 backends. The storage is shared via NFS. Is this the performance problem? If dovecot has metadata I want in its cache, I cannot see how this is a problem. Can these settings be useful for my case? mail_always_cache_fields = mail_cache_fields = flags mail_cache_min_mail_count = 0 mail_never_cache_fields = imap.envelope Thanks.
2005 Apr 09
2
Trying to allocate 0 bytes in index-mail-headers.c
Here's a new one. It just started with the latest (April 8) CVS version. In index-mail-headers.c, line 622: fields = t_new(struct mail_cache_field, count); count is 0 I'm seeing this with several mailboxes. We're using mbox. Here's the error message and backtrace. dovecot: Apr 09 10:53:18 Error: 3348 IMAP(chairman): Trying to allocate 0 bytes dovecot: Apr 09
2005 Jun 14
3
dovecot.index.cache 1/3rd of INBOX size
...my dovecot.index.cache file has got very large (24MB, which is more than 1/3 of my INBOX size). I've tried deleting (well, renaming) the dovecot.index.* files, and re-opening my INBOX, and the new dovecot.index.cache is only 90KB so far. I'm using dovecot-1.0-stable and mbox format. My mail_cache_fields and mail_never_cache_fields are set to the default. Looking back in the list archives, I found a message from Timo that suggested the cache entries are created for each message when the indexes are created, rather than when each message is accessed, so it ought not to grow? What happens when a...
2023 Feb 22
1
Flags/tags lost when moving e-mails to another folder
...7.<HOSTNAME>", "/home/test/Maildir/.test/cur/1672326456.M737813P15507.<HOSTNAME>,S=2498,W=2551:2,S") = 0 15507 unlink("/home/test/Maildir/cur/1672326270.M619318P11927.<HOSTNAME>,S=2498,W=2551:2,Sa") = 0 Setting mbox_lazy_writes to yes and/or unsetting mail_cache_fields doesn't change anything. Any idea of what I am missing? Could this be a bug in Dovecot? Thanks in advance, -- Alexis Ben Miloud--Josselin <abenmiloud at evolix.fr> Evolix - H?bergement et Infog?rance Open Source Marseille (37 rue Guibal, P?le M?dia, 13003) / Paris / Montr?al http://ev...
2018 Jul 18
3
doveadm expunge didn't clear Trash mailbox
And here is mine. All dates are todays! # doveadm -f tab fetch -u test at example.org "uid date.saved" mailbox Trash uid date.saved 6829 2018-07-18 06:04:50 6830 2018-07-18 11:10:13 6831 2018-07-18 16:16:15 6832 2018-07-18 16:16:15 6833 2018-07-18 08:22:55 6834 2018-07-18 16:16:15 6835 2018-07-18 08:47:10 6836 2018-07-18 09:12:11 6837 2018-07-18 09:53:31 6838 2018-07-18 11:03:31 SNIP a
2012 Nov 08
3
Mails don't get deleted after POP3
...128 login_max_connections: 256 valid_chroot_dirs: mail_chroot: max_mail_processes: 512 mail_max_userip_connections: 10 verbose_proctitle: no first_valid_uid: 500 last_valid_uid: 0 first_valid_gid: 1 last_valid_gid: 0 mail_access_groups: mail_privileged_group: mail mail_uid: mail_gid: mail_location: mail_cache_fields: mail_never_cache_fields: imap.envelope mail_cache_min_mail_count: 0 mailbox_idle_check_interval: 30 mail_debug: no mail_full_filesystem_access: no mail_max_keyword_length: 50 mail_save_crlf: no mmap_disable: no dotlock_use_excl: yes fsync_disable: no mail_nfs_storage: no mail_nfs_index: no mailbox...
2014 Dec 05
0
speed up doveadm search
...you tell me if I speed up search on our maildir storage? I have no idea if I must manually (or with cron) run "doveadm index" on all our accounts because index/cache is only generated when users access their mailboxes. Or do I have to tune some settings like : mail_always_cache_fields, mail_cache_fields, mail_cache_min_mail_count, mail_never_cache_fields Thanks
2015 Mar 19
0
fast doveadm search results
...h: SHA1 On Thu, 19 Mar 2015, Vu Ngoc VU wrote: > My goal is to be able to find mails quickly with "doveadm search". What information you are search for? Message-ID, subject, body text? If your data is in the headers, check out: doveconf -a|grep -i cache mail_always_cache_fields = mail_cache_fields = flags mail_cache_min_mail_count = 0 mail_never_cache_fields = imap.envelope e.g. put message-id into mail_always_cache_fields - From http://dovecot.org/pipermail/dovecot-cvs/2013-May/023261.html lib-storage: Allow mail_*cache_fields settings to specify any hdr.* fields - -- Steffen Kaiser --...
2018 Mar 19
2
Controlling dovecot caching decisions
Hello, It looks like the "mail_always_cache_fields" and "mail_never_cache_fields" can be used to control dovecot's caching decisions. I cannot seem to find any documentation regarding how these fields should be used. What are acceptable values for these fields? I am quite new to this so any help would be much appreciated. Regards, Siva -------------- next part
2018 Mar 21
0
dovecot caching decisions
Hello guys, Should the following configuration: mail_cache_fields = flags,imap.body,imap.bodystructure mail_always_cache_fields = imap.body,imap.bodystructure have an effect on the following command? doveadm index -u bob INBOX It seems to have no effect for some reason. Regards, Siva -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed......
2018 Jul 19
0
doveadm expunge didn't clear Trash mailbox
...ted issue several years back, starting with https://dovecot.org/list/dovecot/2012-March/134706.html I'm not sure how I got over this and got usable "date.saved" cache values, and why it stopped working. Maybe I need to set something like mail_always_cache_fields = date.saved mail_cache_fields = date.saved to force date.saved to be cached. On Thu, 19 Jul 2018, Sophie Loewenthal wrote: > And here is mine. All dates are todays! > > # doveadm -f tab fetch -u test at example.org "uid date.saved" mailbox Trash > uid date.saved > 6829 2018-07-18 06:04:50 > 6830 2...
2007 Feb 01
0
Mail Answered status flag in pine stopped working in rc19
...The Answered flag worked properly in dovecot 0.99, but after upgrading to 1.0rc19 it stopped working. Interestingly, mail that was answered before upgrading to rc19 still shows the proper flag. I have tried with mbox_dirty_syncs turned on and off and I have tried putting "flags" in mail_cache_fields. Obviously I am wandering in the dark. Here is the setup: pine 4.64 dovecot 1.0rc19 (installed from rpm dovecot-1.0-2_40.rc19.el4.at.i386.rpm) Centos 4.4.2 x86 mail_location = mbox:~/mail/:INBOX=%h/.mailspool/%u:INDEX=/var/dovecot_indexes\/%d/%n Inbox is NFS mounted, INDEX is on local disk...
2003 Apr 16
2
0.99.9-test5
...p crashing in POP3 server - Several fixes to opening index file which needs to be rebuilt. Before it didn't always rebuild the index but just fallbacked to using only memory, and that could have been quite slow since all mails in the mailbox were opened and parsed. - If there's nothing in mail_cache_fields, index rebuilding doesn't open the file anymore. This should make in-memory indexes a lot faster than before, but it could also mean some performance hits later. If client wants to fetch all mails from the mailbox, the same thing has to be done anyway.. This needs more thinking actually what is...
2004 Jun 18
1
Info: Internal login failure:
...in_process_size = 16 login_process_per_connection = yes login_processes_count = 3 login_max_processes_count = 128 login_max_logging_users = 256 login = pop3 max_mail_processes = 1024 verbose_proctitle = no first_valid_uid = 500 #last_valid_uid = 0 default_mail_env = maildir:/home/mail/%d/%n/Maildir mail_cache_fields = MessagePart client_workarounds = oe6-fetch-no-newmail:outlook-idle: mailbox_check_interval = 300 mailbox_idle_check_interval = 30 mail_save_crlf = yes mail_read_mmaped = no maildir_copy_with_hardlinks = yes mbox_locks = dotlock fcntl mbox_read_dotlock = yes mbox_lock_timeout = 120 mbox_dotlock_ch...
2004 Jul 30
1
1.0-test32
http://dovecot.org/test/ Ok, another one. Fixes somewhat rare crashes with transaction log. mbox won't deadlock anymore. read-only mboxes work finally .. I hope .. and then the one compilation fix in lib-ntlm. Updated the Dovecot serving public mailing list archives, hopefully this version stays working instead of just returning internal error after a while. -------------- next part
2005 May 20
1
Stability
I am currently using Dovecot 0.99.14-r1 as provided by Gentoo, in a Qmail + VPopmail configuration. I am curious as to how to configure it to ensure the most stability, as it serves >1000 clients. I would rather disable any indexing that give small speed improvements if they are not known to be stable. Advice? Cheers, -- Casey Allen Shobe | http://casey.shobe.info cshobe at
2004 Dec 24
2
Deleting a message through IMAP
I have been having a problem with the test releases...I am now using Test 59. When I delete a message using SquirrelMail (IMAP) the message stays in the message list....but you can't open it anymore because it can't be found, if I logout and log back in...the message is gone from the list. I thought it could be a problem with the cache, so I added mail_never_cache_fields = MessagePart