search for: maier

...tations. Is that best handled as some kind of resource share through Samba? How would that be configured? I haven't found any documentation about that. If not Samba, is there another Linux program that would make server modems available to WinXP workstations? Thanks for your help. Dave Maier

Hello Joshua, thank you very much for your extremely quick answer! I really appreciate your work and your friendly and your patient support! On 06/07/2017 at 10:33 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Wed, Jun 7, 2017, at 05:28 PM, Michael Maier wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I've got a problem to select the correct trunk if there is one provider >> and different numbers with different configurations for this same >> provider. >> >> Example: >> >> trunk-prov1-2345 >> trunk-prov1-2346...

...NATIONAL GMBH > http://www.commend.com > > Security and Communication by Commend > > FN 178618z | LG Salzburg > > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- > Von: asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces at lists.digium.com] Im Auftrag von Michael Maier > Gesendet: Montag, 12. Februar 2018 17:46 > An: asterisk-users at lists.digium.com > Betreff: Re: [asterisk-users] What does pct mean? > > Hi Carsten, > > On 02/11/2018 at 07:46 PM Carsten Bock wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Lost percent (%).... > > Are you sur...

...a codec change generate errors like the one below? [2018-02-13 12:57:43] WARNING[4917][C-0004c2cb] codec_sangoma.c: [526559][g722toulaw] Got Seq 15944 but expecting 10106 (time since last read = 0ms), dropped 5838 packets On 02/13/2018 01:24 PM, Andres wrote: > On 2/13/18 11:55 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 02/13/2018 at 08:41 AM Floimair Florian wrote: >>> No you're reading it wrong. >>> >>> There are 188K received with no loss, and 16441K transmitted. >> This doesn't make any sense to me, either. There can't be more packages >> tr...

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 08:33:12PM +0100, Andreas Maier wrote: > Am 06.01.2016 um 20:10 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:58:32PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> > >>Am 06.01.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Maier: > >>>Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >>>>Can't...

On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two ends >>> points on public networks and visible to one another? If not the reinvite >>> may be passing an internal (nat'ed)...

.... 188K 0 0 0.000 188K 16641K 8809 0.000 0.026 => This doesn't sound reliable to me: there are 188K packets and 16641K of them are lost?! The Pct value is fluctuating between about 6009 and 9009. Thanks, Michael > > > Am 11.02.2018 19:27 schrieb "Michael Maier" <m1278468 at mailbox.org>: > >> Hello, >> >> could somebody please tell me the meaning of "Pct" as seen in asterisk cli: >> >> ...........Receive......... .........Transmit.......... >> Count Lost Pct Jitter Count Lost Pct Jitt...

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 12:00 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 11:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > > On 06/05/2017 at 11:30 AM, Joshua Colp wrote: > > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017, at 10:40 AM, Michael Maier wrote: > > >> On 06/04/2017 at 01:41 PM Telium Technical Support wrote: > > >>> Just a guess (without knowing about your network), but are the two...

On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 07:58:32PM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 06.01.2016 um 19:35 schrieb Andreas Maier: > >Am 06.01.2016 um 19:28 schrieb Jeremy Allison: > >>Can't reproduce this on latest 4.3.x (and I just tried). We did have > >>such a bug, but I remember fixing it :-). What Samba version is > >>running on the Synology ? > > > >Jeremy, > >The...

On 05/12/2017 at 08:49 PM, Joshua Colp wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2017, at 02:46 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > <snip> > >> >> If I'm doing exactly the same call originated with another extension, >> there can't be seen these frequent changes. But the strange thing is, >> that in both cases the part between extension and asterisk doesn't show &g...

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017, at 10:49 AM, Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > > t38modem and asterisk are using > > m=image 35622 udptl t38 > ^^^^^ > > Provider uses > > m=image 35622 UDPTL t38 > ^^^^^ > > Could this be a problem? If I'm sending internal only, it's always...

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 08:16 AM, Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > I did some further investigations and fixed a local problem. Now, > asterisk is able to successfully activate T.38 - unfortunately just for > very shot time because of a phantom package it receives! What was the local problem? > Let's go into details: &gt...

...#39;' from /usr/local/bin/unicorn_rails:19:in `<main>'' I, [2010-05-28T08:54:49.301901 #17852] INFO -- : reaped #<Process::Status: pid 17858 exit 1> worker=0 I, [2010-05-28T08:54:49.302066 #17852] INFO -- : master complete Any ideas what''s wrong? Thanks, Stefan Maier

On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 7:46 AM Michael Maier <m1278468 at mailbox.org> wrote: > Hello! > > On 20.10.20 at 14:00 Asterisk Development Team wrote: > > The Asterisk Development Team would like to announce the release of > Asterisk 18.0.0. > > This release is available for immediate download at > > https://dow...

...isk. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Why do I have to provide it especially if it is the default behavior? Why did it work without this option with asterisk 11? Why is there suddenly a difference in behavior between binding a trunk to a ring group or an extension? Puzzled, regards, Michael Maier

On Mon, Jun 5, 2017, at 01:22 PM, Michael Maier wrote: > > Do you have any idea where to start to look at? Adding additional output > in the source code? Which functions could be interesting? I may add own > debug code to see why things are happening as they happen here. The logic for T.38 negotiation lives all in the res_pjsip_t38...

On Sun, Jun 11, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Michael Maier wrote: <snip> > > > > PJSIP uses a dispatch model. The request is queued up, acted on, and > > then that's it. The act of acting on it removes it from the queue. > > That's the *expected* behavior ... . I rechecked again and again. All > existing tcpdump...

...anged configuration): [2016-05-12 09:09:58] VERBOSE[4406] res_pjsip/pjsip_configuration.c: Contact 107/sip:107 at 192.168.15.73:5060 is now Reachable. RTT: 23.332 msec -> nothing more! What's going on in asterisk 13.9? Why does it suddenly behave completely different? Thanks, Michael Maier

On 13.07.20 at 10:54 Joshua C. Colp wrote: > On Sun, Jul 12, 2020 at 11:37 PM Michael Maier <m1278468 at mailbox.org> wrote: >> One more question, >> what about the pjsip pcap support? Will it be backported to Asterisk 16, >> too? Would be absolutely cool! Debugging encrypted SIP is really a pain. >> > > It can't be backported ... because it alread...

...any hints? (maybe setting ulimit for this ssh-connection could help, I haven't tried it yet - just discovered the "bug/strange behaviour" in my environment quite now and have been able to reproduce it). If You need additional info, I'll try to provide it. best regards. Werner Maier. -- Werner Maier, Dipl.-Ing. Univ. E-Mail: maier@fidion.de fidion GmbH Berner Stra?e 2, 97084 W?rzburg