search for: mahesha

...san stuff. Richard, I know you were OK with only supporting Clang-bootstraps, but I don't think that's terribly viable here. We should be able to build ubsan's runtime with standards conforming code unless there is some fairly extreme reason not to... On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources. > > ================================= > > cmake --version > > cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876 > ================================= > > -- > mahesha > &g...

...lding CXX object projects/compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/CMakeFiles/clang_rt.ubsan-i386.dir/ubsan_value.cc.o FAILED: /usr/bin/c++ -D_DEBUG -D_GNU_SOURCE -D__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS -D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -fPIC -fvisibility-inlines-hidden -g -Iprojects/compiler-rt/lib/ubsan -I/local/home/mahesha/src/12th_Sep/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/ubsan -Iinclude -I/local/home/mahesha/src/12th_Sep/llvm/include -I/local/home/mahesha/src/12th_Sep/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/include -I/local/home/mahesha/src/12th_Sep/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/ubsan/.. -Wall -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wwrite-strings...

...read. I think everything will work as of r165863. > - David > > > We should be able to build ubsan's > > runtime with standards conforming code unless there is some fairly > extreme > > reason not to... > > > > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> > wrote: > >> > >> I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources. > >> > >> ================================= > >> > cmake --version > >> > >> cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876...

I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources. ================================= > cmake --version cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876 ================================= -- mahesha On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > I am first time trying build CLANG+LLVM using cmake+ninja build > system. I updated all my CLANG+LLVM sources to current trunk, and I > successfully built it using classic *make* build...

...necessary to bootstrap: viable candidates for C++11 & more or less anything we want to use. - David > We should be able to build ubsan's > runtime with standards conforming code unless there is some fairly extreme > reason not to... > > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I use latest cmake+ninja which are built from latest sources. >> >> ================================= >> > cmake --version >> >> cmake version 2.8.9.20121011-g2876 >> ===============================...

...I think everything will work as of r165863. I am still getting compiler errors for compiler-rt sources as below. Do not know, if the first argument to IsNullLiteralHelper() is to be passed as '0' instead of false, in the below lines. ========================================== /local/home/mahesha/src/12th_Sep/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/tests/asan_noinst_test.cc: In member function ‘virtual void AddressSanitizerInterface_GetAllocatedSizeAndOwnershipTest_Test::TestBody()’: /local/home/mahesha/src/12th_Sep/llvm/projects/compiler-rt/lib/asan/tests/asan_noinst_test.cc:373:3: error: conve...

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >> On 10/13/2012 04:38 AM, Mahesha HS wrote: >>> >>> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> >>&...

...======================================= #. clang/include/clang/Driver/Options.td #. clang/include/clang/Basic/LangOptions.def #. clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticLexKinds.td #. clang/lib/Driver/Tools.cpp #. clang/lib/Frontend/CompilerInvocation.cpp ========================================= -- mahesha On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 2:33 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: >>> On 10/13/2012...

...;t see it. What am I missing? *Clang++ Command Line:* clang++ -v -save-temps hello.cpp *Expanded Command Line Output:* clang version 9.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 2d6bb13443d86d650e92b280d4f7df0805eebac7) Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /home/mahesha/LLVM/install/bin Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7 Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0 Found candidate GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/8 Selected GCC installation: /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/7.3.0 Candidate multili...

...) for the 'optimized' case? (2) Should we run the pass llvm::LiveDebugVariables::runOnMachineFunction() for the case where 'optimized' is set OR we should not? On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 12:25 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:00 AM Mahesha S <mahesha.comp at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I am bit confused - `unit` must be present for definitions, and > `optimized ` is also a `definition`, > > Optimized doesn't make much sense/use for a non-definition, as far as > I understand it - but it's probably a...

I am bit confused - `unit` must be present for definitions, and `optimized ` is also a `definition`, so, `unit` must be present for `optimized ` too. Am I right? Mahesha On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 10:14 PM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > definition and optimized are orthogonal (a function could be both, or > neither) - one says this DISubprogram describes a function definition > (rather than a declaration) and the other says this functi...

...next two patches - one related to PragmaOmpHandler object construction and the another related to OpenMP parsing. Please, let me know, if you need to know any additional information. If you think that some other mechanism is required to speed-up the review process, I will really welcome it. -- mahesha On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 9:36 PM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli, > > Attached zipped file, named, "fopenmp_option_support.tar.gz" contains > the first patch, along with relevant *test case*. This patch is to > support the option "-fopenm...

On 10/13/2012 04:38 AM, Mahesha HS wrote: > On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hi Eli and Others >>> >>> In response to your feedback, I have taken car...

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Tobias Grosser <tobias at grosser.es> wrote: > On 10/13/2012 04:38 AM, Mahesha HS wrote: >> >> On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Eli and Others...

...stand the process followed for converting GIMPLE IR to LLVM IR in LLVM-GCC/DragonEgg - more importantly conversion of OpenMP extended GIMPLE IR to LLVM IR. It would be great if anybody points me to some documentation before I my-self delve into the understanding of related source code. -- Cheers -mahesha -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20120712/01467af8/attachment.html>

...idelines are strictly against duplicating routine/class name in documentation comment though old code is written that way, but, I could still see this kind of duplication in few recent check-ins, after I got this review comment for one of my recent patches. So, I am curious to send this mail. -- mahesha

...compilers in terms of OpenMP features completeness, bench mark results, and the OpenMP infrastructure laid out in LLVM should be flexible enough to handle above mentioned future possibilities. It would be great, if you throw some light upon it. -mahesh On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 8:54 AM, Mahesha S <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Duncan Sands, > > From your reply, what I can understand is that there is no any new OPENMP > specific instructions > > > On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Duncan Sands <baldrick at free.fr> wrote: > >> Hi Mahesh...

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Eli and Others > > In response to your feedback, I have taken care of all your review comments > - I removed clangOMP.a > and moved the implementation of "class OmpPragmaHandler" to "clangLex.a". > > The attac...

...though I do not know the difference between ` DISPFlagDefinition` and ` DISPFlagOptimized`. if that is expected, then we may need to check `nullity` of `DISubprogram::getUnit()` before accessing it at https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/master/llvm/lib/CodeGen/LexicalScopes.cpp#L53 Thanks, Mahesha On Sun, May 31, 2020 at 11:26 AM David Blaikie <dblaikie at gmail.com> wrote: > In theory the LLVM IR verifier (llvm/lib/IR/Verifier.cpp) should catch > this sort of thing. Maybe it isn't running in llc? It probably should > be. It's also likely not exhaustive to completely...

On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 5:14 AM, Eli Friedman <eli.friedman at gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Mahesha HS <mahesha.llvm at gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi Eli and Others >> >> In response to your feedback, I have taken care of all your review comments >> - I removed clangOMP.a >> and moved the implementation of "class OmpPragmaHandler" to "clangLex.a"....