search for: madina

Does anybody know if there is some tool to convert from WHIRL to LLVM? maybe some project under development? a similar project? Thanks > > --- Duraid Madina <duraid at octopus.com.au> wrote: > > Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:45:54 +0900 > > From: Duraid Madina <duraid at octopus.com.au> > > To: ahs3 at fc.hp.com, LLVM Developers Mailing List <llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu> > > Subject: Re: [LLVMdev] new IA64 backend >...

Hi everyone, I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty rough right now. Here are some of the known defects: - No varargs - No alloca - No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort ...or in other words, it breaks often and when it does work, it's a dog. On the plus side, it _does_ have a tasty new pattern instruction selector. :) Beyond fixing the

Andrew Lenharth wrote: > On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote: >> - No varargs > > What are your issues here? Or are they simply at the "not implemented > so I don't know" stage? The two bugs I mentioned (no varargs, no alloca) are pretty much two sides of the same coin: I'm ignoring the IA64 stack frame layout (for...

Hi all, This is just to announce that I have a FreeBSD x86 machine running the test suite more or less continuously: http://kinoko.c.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~builddonkey/ Of note is that it now runs Dejagnu tests. (Thanks, tonic+co!) I'm also tracking CVS breakage (internally, for now). At some later point, I'll make available more real-time information on "is CVS alive and if not,

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Be warned, it's pretty > rough right now. Here are some of the known defects: > > - No varargs What are your issues here? Or are they simply at the "not implemented so I don't know&quot...

On Fri, 2005-03-18 at 05:04 +0900, Duraid Madina wrote: > I've just checked in an IA64 backend to LLVM! Woo hoo! And There Was Much Rejoicing in IA64 Land :-). -- Ciao, al ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Al Stone Alter Ego: Linux & Open Source Lab...

On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Duraid Madina wrote: >>> - No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort >> >> So this one needs to be coordinated. Next week, I might see about >> adding MachineInstruction support to the SelectionDAG so you can load up >> a DAG post-ISel and then spit it back out scheduled....

Hello Duraid, Duraid Madina wrote on Wednesday, 11 May 2005: >> I've just tried building CVS/HEAD of llvm using gcc 4.0.0 that I >> have installed to /opt/gcc > ... then you should either add /opt/gcc/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and > rerun ldconfig, or add /opt/gcc/lib to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH . > However,...

Oleg Smolsky wrote: > I've just tried building CVS/HEAD of llvm using gcc 4.0.0 that I have > installed to /opt/gcc ... then you should either add /opt/gcc/lib to /etc/ld.so.conf and rerun ldconfig, or add /opt/gcc/lib to your LD_LIBRARY_PATH . However, GCC 4.x definitely has issues building LLVM, at least on ia64. If you want to use LLVM in anger, I'd stick with 3.4 for now.

...ease let us know. 2. Andrew Lenharth is working on a native Alpha backend for LLVM. It can run many programs correctly, but does not currently support C++, longjmp, varargs, or dynamic stack allocations yet. Alpha Nightly Tester: http://www.lenharth.org/llvm-alpha/ 3. Duraid Madina has started work on an IA-64 backend and will be checking it into CVS in the near future. 4. As mentioned here: http://mail.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2004-December/000014.html We've changed the llvm-gcc build instruction to build executables prefixed with "llvm-&...

...ll* LLVM libraries in any tool. > > Does anybody have got a example of an aplication which uses these functions > to compile and execute in memory a multi-file application? (lli isn't useful > for me) The closest thing we have is the HowToUseJIT example program. I believe Duraid Madina is working on something similar. You might want to check with him (duraid at octopus dot com dot au) > > Thanks in advance and apologize so basic questions. Glad to help. I hope you find LLVM useful. Reid -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name:...

...le. The work just fine except for some instruction (like malloc) that demand an uint and not an ulong. With the shift from the 32 to the 64 bit world, is this something that will be enhanced in the future, or would that have to much impact on the existing llvm codebase? best regards Eric Duraid Madina wrote: > Hi there, > > The IA64 architecture, which had its 'official' name changed to > the "Itanium Processor Architecture", *is* supported by llc. I am > pretty sure you are talking about the x86-64 architecture, which has > also had its share of unfortun...

On Thu, 2005-03-17 at 23:31 -0600, Chris Lattner wrote: > On Fri, 18 Mar 2005, Duraid Madina wrote: > >>> - No instruction scheduling/bundling of any sort > >> > >> So this one needs to be coordinated. Next week, I might see about > >> adding MachineInstruction support to the SelectionDAG so you can load up > >> a DAG post-ISel and then sp...

On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 11:43:42AM +0900, Duraid Madina wrote: > Are there some magic .vimrc lines that people can use to keep the > style police happy? (And if so, are these documented on the website > anywhere? I had a quick look, but couldn't find anything... By popular demand :), I just added a file llvm/utils/vim/vimrc which you may u...

> Itanium Everything checks out as expected. :) Duraid

Hi, everybody: I am a beginner with LLVM, in fact today was the first day that I use it. I have several questions about LLVM: Can I use LLVM to compile several files (bytecode), scripts (char*) and link them with external libraries generating *only* one executable (all in memory)? Can I invoke externals functions from a guest (LLVM generated) code which exist in the host code (the code that

Dear all, > version _ platform i386-pc-mingw32 arch i386 os mingw32 system i386, mingw32 status major 1 minor 5.0 year 2002 month 04 day 29 language R OS: Win98 I have a strange problem with a particular data.frame built with

Dear All, I've finished building binaries for the GCC frontends and am now testing the 1.5 release branch on i386/Linux, Sparc/Solaris, and PowerPC/MacOS X. I'm looking for volunteers to test LLVM 1.5 on platforms that we don't have in house. I'm specifically looking for people who can do: Itanium FreeBSD/i386 Windows (Cygwin, MingW, etc) I'm mainly interested in major

Hi there, The IA64 architecture, which had its 'official' name changed to the "Itanium Processor Architecture", *is* supported by llc. I am pretty sure you are talking about the x86-64 architecture, which has also had its share of unfortunate name changes and is also known as "AMD64", "EM64T" and all sorts of things in between. x86-64 is *not* currently

Hi, For the PyPy project ( http://codespeak.net/pypy ) I am working on the x64-64 support. I would like to use llc -march=ia64 to generate the assembly but that is not supported at the moment. As a workaround I let llc generate C code that gets compiled, but this unfortunately is not a good way to show the power of llvm. A understood this ia64 support will be worked on soon. First week of july