Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "macvtap_major".
2010 Jan 27
9
[Bridge] [PATCH 0/3 v3] macvtap driver
This is the third version of the macvtap device driver, following another major restructuring and a lot of bug fixes:
* Change macvtap to be based around a struct sock
* macvtap: fix initialization
* return 0 to netlink
* don't use rcu for q->file and q->vlan pointers
* macvtap: checkpatch.pl fixes
* macvtap: fix tun IFF flags
* Use a struct socket to make tx flow control work
* disable
2010 Jan 27
9
[Bridge] [PATCH 0/3 v3] macvtap driver
This is the third version of the macvtap device driver, following another major restructuring and a lot of bug fixes:
* Change macvtap to be based around a struct sock
* macvtap: fix initialization
* return 0 to netlink
* don't use rcu for q->file and q->vlan pointers
* macvtap: checkpatch.pl fixes
* macvtap: fix tun IFF flags
* Use a struct socket to make tx flow control work
* disable
2010 Jan 27
9
[Bridge] [PATCH 0/3 v3] macvtap driver
This is the third version of the macvtap device driver, following another major restructuring and a lot of bug fixes:
* Change macvtap to be based around a struct sock
* macvtap: fix initialization
* return 0 to netlink
* don't use rcu for q->file and q->vlan pointers
* macvtap: checkpatch.pl fixes
* macvtap: fix tun IFF flags
* Use a struct socket to make tx flow control work
* disable
2009 Dec 03
3
[RFC 0/2] macvtap, second try
I did not get this ready for the merge window, but people asked what
the status of this is so I'm posting it now to solicit feedback.
The first patch just adds some hooks into macvlan.c and is less
invasive than the previous version. That part should be fine
and I'd like this to get merged into macvlan for 2.6.33 if people
agree that the approach is right.
The second patch adds the
2009 Dec 03
3
[RFC 0/2] macvtap, second try
I did not get this ready for the merge window, but people asked what
the status of this is so I'm posting it now to solicit feedback.
The first patch just adds some hooks into macvlan.c and is less
invasive than the previous version. That part should be fine
and I'd like this to get merged into macvlan for 2.6.33 if people
agree that the approach is right.
The second patch adds the
2009 Dec 03
3
[RFC 0/2] macvtap, second try
I did not get this ready for the merge window, but people asked what
the status of this is so I'm posting it now to solicit feedback.
The first patch just adds some hooks into macvlan.c and is less
invasive than the previous version. That part should be fine
and I'd like this to get merged into macvlan for 2.6.33 if people
agree that the approach is right.
The second patch adds the