Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "macroassembl".
Did you mean:
macroassembler
2016 Feb 13
2
Code in headers
> On Feb 11, 2016, at 12:43 AM, via llvm-dev <Alexander G. Riccio> wrote:
>
> I don’t think that we can agree to abstract code guidelines without knowing what it means in practice for the codebase. If you’re interested in this, please include a diff that shows the impact to the headers, and we should also measure what happens to the performance of the generated compiler.
>
>