search for: macho_arm_pic_reloc

Hi Lang, Thanks for your help at the Hackers Lab. Fixing the problems we identified in RuntimeDyldMachOARM.h improves the MachO_ARM_PIC_relocations.s test quite a lot but there's one failed check that's proving a bit stubborn: Expression '*{4}(stub_addr(foo.o, __text, baz)) = 0xe51ff004' is false: 0x4f01fe5 != 0xe51ff004 I'm struggling to find the cause of this mismatch at the moment. Do you have any...

...Cc:* LLVM Developers Mailing List (llvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu) > *Subject:* [LLVMdev] Remaining big-endian host issues in RuntimeDyld > > > > Hi Lang, > > > > Thanks for your help at the Hackers Lab. Fixing the problems we identified > in RuntimeDyldMachOARM.h improves the MachO_ARM_PIC_relocations.s test > quite a lot but there's one failed check that's proving a bit stubborn: > > Expression '*{4}(stub_addr(foo.o, __text, baz)) = > 0xe51ff004' is false: 0x4f01fe5 != 0xe51ff004 > > > > I'm struggling to find the cause of this m...