search for: machinces

I'm using the excellent --link-dest option on rsync to do every-day full backups of a number of servers. These servers share most of the file-system content, but of course has some variations. In order to reduce the space used for each backup, I was thinking about linking all files in the backups to their hash in a separate directory, allowing only one storage of each file-value, reducing

...I'm using CentOS release 5.6 (Final) and Xen 3.1. I'm writing to ask how to configure port forwarding. With virt-manager 0.6.1 I added the machines, but there I don't see an option for port forwarding. I would like to reach the VM on a specific port of the host machine. Once the machinces are running, I can configure iptables so that the port forwarding works, but after host reboots, other rules are inserted (put in front of my rules), which disable my rules. I guess these rules are put by libvirt, and so I'm writing to this list. These are the rules inserted: Chain FORWAR...

On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 01:30:29PM -0700, Qiuyu Zhang wrote: [snip] > push %eax > das > clc > > all of them are legal one-byte x86 machine instructions. [snip] > If there is a way to be able to get that, I am supposed that like > the following, > > 1. generate some dummy BB on IR level ( working on *.bc by writing a

Hi, Thanks Volodya, Misha and Chris, > > For example, > > Correct way: > > Instruction *NewInst = new LoadInst(...); > > NewBB->getInstList().push_back(NewInst); > > > > what I need just put some junk data in the BB, not instructions. From > > assemble code level, it looks like the following, > > > > a piece of code from

hi, I am quite new on using Samba and sorry maybe ask a silly question here. I set up simple Samba server on Fedora3 using the samba rpm package comes with fedora3( version 3.0.10-1.fc3). I use the SHARE security level to make things easier. Everything goes fine so far, except that for some windows user, some times, on browsing some directories, it takes extremely long time to display the

Hi, Thanks again. >>> during step 2, we read *.bc code and find dummy BB and put some >>> meaningless machinecode, here, we cannot put some illegal machince >>> code, otherwise, step 3 goes to fail. >> >> Yes, you are correct -- if you want to create illegal code you need to >> not use system as. What you need is the ability for llc to create

Hi, One more thing I just realized for the method Chris mentioned. >Actually that's not true. You can make instructions with an asmstring of: > > ".byte 123\n .byte 56\n .byte 86" and those bytes will get emitted to >the code stream. It seems to work on generating binary file since it uses asmstring, right? There are two steps related with binary file operation,

Hi, I use CentOS as a firewall/proxy/webserver/fileserver in my small network. As the small-spec machine with CentOS is heavily loaded/used I can't afford downtime. 20 GB, pentium II with only 128 MB RAM. However I want to know the news on 4.5 is it due soon? Can I gain more by running CentOS 3.x range on such an old machine like mine? Will CentOS 5.0 mean you need a minimum of 512 RAM?

...em related to half/full duplex nature of the NICs and raw speed. With my cable being in the "boonies" and a stock Toshiba cable model, good sites get me 600-700 kChars/sec on the Pentium, appx. 530K/sec on the AMD and 460K/sec on the Aptiva. With that in hand, Aleksandr's staple, $20 machinces, should fit in your scenario very nicely. Like him, I have a bunch of those (even some $10 ones - 386SX comes to mind). Find justification for their continued existence seems to be my biggest problem! :P > > Fred > <snip sig stuff> HTH -- Bill ------------------------------ M...