search for: machinc

...st of the file-system content, but of course has some variations. In order to reduce the space used for each backup, I was thinking about linking all files in the backups to their hash in a separate directory, allowing only one storage of each file-value, reducing my backup-needs with ~5Gb per machince. Further this would allow rysnc to represent moved files without any space-usage at all, for example rotated backups and user-moved files fit this description. I realize, that there may be problems with file-system performance on such large directories, but that could probably be workarounded...

...I'm using CentOS release 5.6 (Final) and Xen 3.1. I'm writing to ask how to configure port forwarding. With virt-manager 0.6.1 I added the machines, but there I don't see an option for port forwarding. I would like to reach the VM on a specific port of the host machine. Once the machinces are running, I can configure iptables so that the port forwarding works, but after host reboots, other rules are inserted (put in front of my rules), which disable my rules. I guess these rules are put by libvirt, and so I'm writing to this list. These are the rules inserted: Chain FORW...

...ass) > 2. llc *.bc ( generate machine code) > 3. as -o *.s *o ( generate object file, or use gcc ) > 4. ld -o *.out *.o ( generate executable file) > > during step 2, we read *.bc code and find dummy BB and put some > meaningless machinecode, here, we cannot put some illegal machince > code, otherwise, step 3 goes to fail. Yes, you are correct -- if you want to create illegal code you need to not use system as. What you need is the ability for llc to create object files with native code directly, without using the system assembler. I think someone is working on it, but...

...working on *.bc by writing a pass) 2. llc *.bc ( generate machine code) 3. as -o *.s *o ( generate object file, or use gcc ) 4. ld -o *.out *.o ( generate executable file) during step 2, we read *.bc code and find dummy BB and put some meaningless machinecode, here, we cannot put some illegal machince code, otherwise, step 3 goes to fail. So is it possible to do that for inserting any machine code into BB? if so, how could we chang llc? I take a look at MachineInstr.c CodeGenerator.c etc, but I still don't know how to do it. Here is a thing that may be useful to understand what I want to...

hi, I am quite new on using Samba and sorry maybe ask a silly question here. I set up simple Samba server on Fedora3 using the samba rpm package comes with fedora3( version 3.0.10-1.fc3). I use the SHARE security level to make things easier. Everything goes fine so far, except that for some windows user, some times, on browsing some directories, it takes extremely long time to display the

Hi, Thanks again. >>> during step 2, we read *.bc code and find dummy BB and put some >>> meaningless machinecode, here, we cannot put some illegal machince >>> code, otherwise, step 3 goes to fail. >> >> Yes, you are correct -- if you want to create illegal code you need to >> not use system as. What you need is the ability for llc to create >> object files with native code directly, without using the system >>...

...lvmdev at cs.uiuc.edu Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 7:32 PM Subject: RE:RE: Question about inserting instructions Hi, Thanks again. >>> during step 2, we read *.bc code and find dummy BB and put some >>> meaningless machinecode, here, we cannot put some illegal machince >>> code, otherwise, step 3 goes to fail. >> >> Yes, you are correct -- if you want to create illegal code you need to >> not use system as. What you need is the ability for llc to create >> object files with native code directly, without using the syste...

Hi, I use CentOS as a firewall/proxy/webserver/fileserver in my small network. As the small-spec machine with CentOS is heavily loaded/used I can't afford downtime. 20 GB, pentium II with only 128 MB RAM. However I want to know the news on 4.5 is it due soon? Can I gain more by running CentOS 3.x range on such an old machine like mine? Will CentOS 5.0 mean you need a minimum of 512 RAM?

...em related to half/full duplex nature of the NICs and raw speed. With my cable being in the "boonies" and a stock Toshiba cable model, good sites get me 600-700 kChars/sec on the Pentium, appx. 530K/sec on the AMD and 460K/sec on the Aptiva. With that in hand, Aleksandr's staple, $20 machinces, should fit in your scenario very nicely. Like him, I have a bunch of those (even some $10 ones - 386SX comes to mind). Find justification for their continued existence seems to be my biggest problem! :P > > Fred > <snip sig stuff> HTH -- Bill ------------------------------...