Displaying 2 results from an estimated 2 matches for "mach_xxx".
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
> Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture
> (mach-default).
>
> I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in
> my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings.
I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the
earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default?
thanks,
-chris
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote:
> Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture
> (mach-default).
>
> I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in
> my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings.
I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the
earlier set which added more reliance on mach-default?
thanks,
-chris