search for: mach_system

Displaying 11 results from an estimated 11 matches for "mach_system".

2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 13/24] i386 Vmi system header
...ystem.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2006-03-10 12:55:08.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/system.h 2006-03-10 13:03:36.000000000 -0800 @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ #ifdef __KERNEL__ +#include <mach_system.h> + struct task_struct; /* one of the stranger aspects of C forward declarations.. */ extern struct task_struct * FASTCALL(__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)); @@ -83,69 +85,8 @@ __asm__ __volatile__ ("movw %%dx,%1\n\t" #define savesegment(seg, value)...
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 13/24] i386 Vmi system header
...ystem.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/system.h 2006-03-10 12:55:08.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/system.h 2006-03-10 13:03:36.000000000 -0800 @@ -9,6 +9,8 @@ #ifdef __KERNEL__ +#include <mach_system.h> + struct task_struct; /* one of the stranger aspects of C forward declarations.. */ extern struct task_struct * FASTCALL(__switch_to(struct task_struct *prev, struct task_struct *next)); @@ -83,69 +85,8 @@ __asm__ __volatile__ ("movw %%dx,%1\n\t" #define savesegment(seg, value)...
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added
2007 Apr 18
2
[PATCH 1/6] i386 virtualization - Fix uml build
* zach@vmware.com (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > Attempt to fix the UML build by assuming the default i386 subarchitecture > (mach-default). > > I can't fully test this because spinlock breakage is still happening in > my tree, but it gets rid of the mach_xxx.h missing file warnings. I assume this is intended to fix a build error caused by patches in the earlier set which added
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit
...-#define smp_mb() barrier() -#define smp_rmb() barrier() -#define smp_wmb() barrier() -#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0) -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0) -#endif - #define set_wmb(var, value) do { var = value; wmb(); } while (0) #include <mach_system.h> @@ -439,6 +258,4 @@ wbinvd(); } -extern unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp); - #endif Index: linux-2.6.13-rc5-mm1-abi/include/asm-um/ptrace-generic.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13-rc5-mm1-abi.orig/include/asm-um/ptrace-...
2007 Apr 18
1
[RFC] [PATCH] Split host arch headers for UML's benefit
...-#define smp_mb() barrier() -#define smp_rmb() barrier() -#define smp_wmb() barrier() -#define smp_read_barrier_depends() do { } while(0) -#define set_mb(var, value) do { var = value; barrier(); } while (0) -#endif - #define set_wmb(var, value) do { var = value; wmb(); } while (0) #include <mach_system.h> @@ -439,6 +258,4 @@ wbinvd(); } -extern unsigned long arch_align_stack(unsigned long sp); - #endif Index: linux-2.6.13-rc5-mm1-abi/include/asm-um/ptrace-generic.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.13-rc5-mm1-abi.orig/include/asm-um/ptrace-...
2007 Apr 18
33
[RFC PATCH 00/33] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments