search for: mach_seg

Displaying 7 results from an estimated 7 matches for "mach_seg".

Did you mean: mach_msg
[RFC, PATCH 11/24] i386 Vmi segment changes
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 11/24] i386 Vmi segment changes
...linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/segment.h 2006-03-08 16:58:49.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/segment.h 2006-03-08 17:10:26.000000000 -0800 @@ -112,4 +112,9 @@ */ #define IDT_ENTRIES 256 +#define SEGMENT_RPL_MASK 0x03 +#define SEGMENT_TI_MASK 0x04 + +#include <mach_segment.h> + #endif Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_segment.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_segment.h 2006-03-08 17:10:26.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-...
[RFC, PATCH 11/24] i386 Vmi segment changes
2007 Apr 18
0
[RFC, PATCH 11/24] i386 Vmi segment changes
...linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/segment.h 2006-03-08 16:58:49.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/segment.h 2006-03-08 17:10:26.000000000 -0800 @@ -112,4 +112,9 @@ */ #define IDT_ENTRIES 256 +#define SEGMENT_RPL_MASK 0x03 +#define SEGMENT_TI_MASK 0x04 + +#include <mach_segment.h> + #endif Index: linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_segment.h =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16-rc5.orig/include/asm-i386/mach-vmi/mach_segment.h 2006-03-08 17:10:26.000000000 -0800 +++ linux-2.6.16-rc5/include/asm-i386/mach-...
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
2007 Apr 18
3
[PATCH] abstract out bits of ldt.c
Chris Wright wrote: >* Zachary Amsden (zach@vmware.com) wrote: > > >>Does Xen assume page aligned descriptor tables? I assume from this >> >> > >Yes. > > > >>patch and snippets I have gathered from others, that is a yes, and other >>things here imply that DT pages are not shadowed. If so, Xen itself >>must have live segments
[RFC PATCH 00/33] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
2007 Apr 18
33
[RFC PATCH 00/33] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
2007 Apr 18
43
[RFC PATCH 00/35] Xen i386 paravirtualization support
Unlike full virtualization in which the virtual machine provides the same platform interface as running natively on the hardware, paravirtualization requires modification to the guest operating system to work with the platform interface provided by the hypervisor. Xen was designed with performance in mind. Calls to the hypervisor are minimized, batched if necessary, and non-critical codepaths