search for: m2j

Displaying 6 results from an estimated 6 matches for "m2j".

Did you mean: m2
2015 May 12
4
Letting linux be the router, allowing dynamic routes, suggestion
What challenge this would solve ? VPN software in general tries to be another router when running in server mode with multiple clients. This restricts VPN customers from having complex topology. For instance, I'd like to have two tunnels between each client network and each server (with two broadband connections on each end), with some OSPF running and automatically switching from one to
2015 May 12
0
Letting linux be the router, allowing dynamic routes, suggestion
On 12 May 2015 at 05:13, Marcelo Pacheco <marcelo at m2j.com.br> wrote: > The solution to all of those challenges is to have the VPN software not be > the router, but rather just dump incoming packets to the kernel and route > outgoing packets with the kernel in charge. I think you can already do this in tinc by using the Forwarding = kernel...
2005 Jun 06
0
Any thoughts
...a Digital RAS, or a PBX with Fax machine/dial-up users. The criteria for dial-up would be to successfully deal with V.90 calls at rates higher than 40 kbps, and no noticeable degradation from having the E1/T1 line conected directly to the PBX or the RAS box. Thanks in advance, Marcelo Pacheco M2J Comunica??es e Inform?tica Brazil - Vitoria-ES
2008 Jun 30
4
Rebuild of kernel 2.6.9-67.0.20.EL failure
Hello list. I'm trying to rebuild the 2.6.9.67.0.20.EL kernel, but it fails even without modifications. How did I try it? Created a (non-root) build environment (not a mock ) Installed the kernel.scr.rpm and did a rpmbuild -ba --target=`uname -m` kernel-2.6.spec 2> prep-err.log | tee prep-out.log The build failed at the end: Processing files: kernel-xenU-devel-2.6.9-67.0.20.EL Checking
2015 May 12
2
Letting linux be the router, allowing dynamic routes, suggestion
No, this would in fact operate as a routing mode instead of bridging. TAP would be used as a means to push routing to where it belongs, the linux/bsd/... kernel. Consider the challenge of having completely dynamic routing between vpn peers. In one minute I might have 10000 routes towards one specific peer, and hour latter I might have NONE. And I need to diferentiate each peer at the kernel
2015 May 12
2
Letting linux be the router, allowing dynamic routes, suggestion
I see what you want me to do. But it does incur an extra MAC layer header to each VPN packet, more fragmentation. And broadcasts leak to all peers. It sure saves you from doing any improvements, but there are side effects that are undesirable to many customers. This is specially a problem if I want two VPN connections between two sites using redundant connections, we get an instant L2 loop. With