search for: m16

I just want to state that I hope we never implement the 16-bit Microsoft C++ ABI for -m16. On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:00 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > Absolutely fantastic work, David. Thank you! > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 4:35 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2 at infradead.org> wrote: > > > Here's a brief update on the current state of 16-...

...-f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m4 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw real 0m3.674s user 0m0.071s sys 0m3.140s $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m8 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw real 0m3.408s user 0m0.069s sys 0m3.813s $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m16 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw real 0m3.305s user 0m0.054s sys 0m3.767s Same with the modified file plugin, using direct I/O and without extents: $ rm -f /tmp/nbd.sock && ./nbdkit -U /tmp/nbd.sock -t1 -f -r file file=/var/tmp/disk.raw $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -S0 -m1...

...-f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m4 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw real 0m3.674s user 0m0.071s sys 0m3.140s $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m8 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw real 0m3.408s user 0m0.069s sys 0m3.813s $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m16 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw real 0m3.305s user 0m0.054s sys 0m3.767s Same with the modified file plugin, using direct I/O and without extents: $ rm -f /tmp/nbd.sock && ./nbdkit -U /tmp/nbd.sock -t1 -f -r file file=/var/tmp/disk.raw $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -S0 -m1...

.../disk.raw > > real 0m3.674s > user 0m0.071s > sys 0m3.140s > > $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m8 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw > > real 0m3.408s > user 0m0.069s > sys 0m3.813s > > $ time qemu-img convert -f raw -O raw -T none -S0 -m16 -W /var/tmp/disk.raw /dev/shm/disk.raw > > real 0m3.305s > user 0m0.054s > sys 0m3.767s > > Same with the modified file plugin, using direct I/O and without > extents: > > $ rm -f /tmp/nbd.sock && ./nbdkit -U /tmp/nbd.sock -t1 -f -r file file=/var/tmp/disk.raw...

...The assembler has support for the .code16 directive and can happily output 16-bit code. In pending patches¹ I have also added an i386-*-*-code16 triple and fixed the disassembler to support 16-bit mode (which was previously present, but could not be invoked and was fairly broken). And added a '-m16' option to clang. The main caveats to bear in mind for 16-bit code which was previously built with gcc/gas are: • We do not support the explicit 'data32' and 'addr32' prefixes in asm. The data32 prefix is almost never needed. If you use the correct suffix on an instruc...

Which BTQ? There are three flavors. BTQ reg/reg BTQ reg/mem BTQ reg/imm I can imagine that the reg/reg and especially the reg/mem versions would be slow. However the shrq/and versions *with the same operands* would be slow as well. There's even a compiler comment about the reg/mem version saying "this is for disassembly only". But I doubt BTQ reg/imm would be microcoded. -- Ite

Some interesting results: copy of 500MB file 'time cp file file.new' ext3, -d1 -c1 -m16 -u1 -W1 real 1m42.435s user 0m0.220s sys 0m17.740s ext3, -d1 -c1 -m16 -u0 -W0 real 2m24.970s user 0m0.210s sys 0m18.780s ext3, -d1 -c1 -m16 -u0 -W1 real 1m52.677s user 0m0.290s sys 0m17.950s So basically my question is; do I loose all benefits of ext3 if I turn on the hard d...

...ery for dovecot, postfix and https? That would be good indeed. Anyone know of any manual, or can I just replace the certs in the dovecot and postfix locations with theirs? Do dovecot, postfix and apache all support .pem format? Sent from my iPhone > On 9 Aug 2017, at 17:07, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote: > >> On 09.08.2017 17:49, Alef Veld wrote: >> >> I think let?s encrypt uses certbot though and it can?t do email >> certificates (although i?m sure i can convert the cert i get from >> let?s encrypt, i?ll look into it. > &...

Thanks Ralph, i?ll look into that. I think let?s encrypt uses certbot though and it can?t do email certificates (although i?m sure i can convert the cert i get from let?s encrypt, i?ll look into it. > On 9 Aug 2017, at 16:40, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote: > > On 09.08.2017 17:20, Alef Veld wrote: > >> So i?m using dovecot, and i created a self signed certificate with >> mkcert.sh based on dovecot-openssl.cnf. The name in there matches my >> mail server. >> >> The first t...

...=55289#c29 Index: mach_override.c =================================================================== --- mach_override.c (revision 167724) +++ mach_override.c (working copy) @@ -725,6 +725,8 @@ { 0x2, {0xFF, 0x00}, {0x89, 0x00} }, // mov r/m32,r32 or r/m16,r16 { 0x3, {0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF}, {0x49, 0x89, 0xF8} }, // mov %rdi,%r8 { 0x4, {0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF}, {0x40, 0x0F, 0xBE, 0xCE} }, // movsbl %sil,%ecx + { 0x7, {0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00}, + {0x48, 0x8D, 0x05, 0x00, 0x00,...

On 08 Sep 2017, at 10:08, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote: > What is Dovecot supposed to do? Keep track of the certificate expiry > date? And if that is passed, then what? Automatically shutdown/restart? > What if the certificate has not been updated in between? I think that > handling certificates is bette...

On 08 Sep 2017, at 12:21, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote: > On 08.09.2017 19:51, @lbutlr wrote: >> How I would do it is IF the certificate is expired, the dovecot should >> check if there is a new cert and if so, load it. > New cert as in file modification date or checksum changed? Either one, but...

How are the screenshots at syslinux's homepage taken? I would like to take some of my extlinux setup for my usb to archive as well as show to my friends. Also for the pictures under syslinux-3.51/sample/ "syslinux_splash.jpg" and "m16-640x640-syslinux.jpg" could someone edit the text for it to say extlinux instead(or the original pics)? also any other places to find cool backgrounds? (other then KDE-look.org)...

...MA={min:120,rec:120} PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 UDMA modes: udma0 udma1 udma2 AdvancedPM=no WriteCache=enabled Drive conforms to: unknown: * signifies the current active mode So from recommendation on website I did this to match MaxMultiSect: hdparm -m16 /dev/hda then tried this to turn MultSect off: hdparm -m0 /dev/hda Still getting error. The Supermicro MBD-X7SBL-LN1-O motherboard has basically all defaults set in bios. Any ideas? Thanks. Matt

...ot.org> Date: 05/12/2018 08:26 (GMT+02:00) To: dovecot at dovecot.org Subject: Re[2]: BUG: sieve does not set seen-Flag Unsubscribe me please. I've been seeing these messages for several days and don't want anymore. Please. ?????, 5 ??????? 2018, 3:22 +03:00 ?? Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net>: * Jakobus Sch?rz: > 1543935543.M447415P13997.mymail,S=726,W=748:2,Sa > > Then i move this email to another IMAP-Folder, and then there is the > filename > > 1543935543.M447415P13997.mymail,S=726,W=748:2,...

On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > > On Jul 10, 2013, at 17:44, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: > > The length specifier is, as I understand it, required when the instruction > references memory but is optional (and inferred from

Hi, I'm new at this, I'm very confused, and I think I'm missing something important here. In our pet example we have this: > fm <- lme(Orthodont) > plot(Orthodont) > plot(augPred(fm, level = 0:1)) which gives us a trellis plot with the females above the males, starting with "F03", "F04", "F11", "F06", etc. I thought the point of

...::x86_64” at the end, yes? Nah, I turned that parameter into a Triple::ArchType so that I can pass x86_16 as an option too. See the patch on llvm-commits which adds the x86_16 target. Currently working on a few codegen bugs with building the Linux kernel's 16-bit startup code with 'clang -m16'... -- dwmw2 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature Size: 5745 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/attachments/20140106/c5313a98/attachment.bin>

On Thursday, October 11, 2018 12:07 PM, Ralph Seichter <m16+dovecot at monksofcool.net> wrote: > On 11.10.18 11:30, Laura Smith wrote: > > > unix_listener /var/spool/postfix-authrelay/private/dovecot-auth { > > group = postfix > > mode = 0666 > > user = postfix > > } > > I suggest using "mode = 0660" i...

On Jul 10, 2013, at 6:54 PM, Stephen Checkoway <s at pahtak.org> wrote: > On Jul 10, 2013, at 17:44, Jim Grosbach <grosbach at apple.com> wrote: >> The length specifier is, as I understand it, required when the instruction references memory but is optional (and inferred from the registers) for the register variants. >> >> The best reference I know of for the