search for: m001338

Displaying 1 result from an estimated 1 matches for "m001338".

Did you mean: 001338
2008 Jun 24
2
wrong number of arguments (1 for 0) when using respond_to?
...ord/attribute_methods.rb:342:in `respond_to?'' /usr/local/apache2/rails/myapp/app/models/pathmaker.rb:11:in `append_features'' The online docs for respond_to? shows one required parameter, just like I''m doing: http://api.rubyonrails.org/classes/ActiveRecord/Base.html#M001338 So then I thought to check if Rails 2.1.0 has a different version of respond_to?. I tried to check my local rdocs, to be sure I was actually looking at version 2.1.0, but it seems Rails 2.1.0 didn''t building rdocs when I installed it, nor will it when I reinstall it: > sudo gem ins...