Displaying 5 results from an estimated 5 matches for "lzma2".
Did you mean:
lzma
2012 Aug 02
1
LZMA2 (xz) support for Dovecot?
Timo,
Thoughts on adding LZMA2 (xz) support via liblzma to Dovecot?
--
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.
2011 Sep 23
0
[xen-unstable test] 9061: regressions - FAIL
...rrectly return XZ_BUF_ERROR if all of the
following was true:
- The caller knows how many bytes of output to expect and only
provides
that much output space.
- When the last output bytes are decoded, the caller-provided input
buffer ends right before the LZMA2 end of payload marker. So LZMA2
won''t provide more output anymore, but it won''t know it yet and
thus
won''t return XZ_STREAM_END yet.
- A BCJ filter is in use and it hasn''t left any unfiltered bytes in
the
temp buffer....
2015 Nov 04
2
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
...th R-devel and
>> report any significant differences.
>
In particular - I wonder about lzma as I already knew this (having built
xz a long time ago. LZMA has been replaced by XZ. Do not know why, and
do not want to.
BUT there is no reliable source for LZMA5 (the XZ project only reports
LZMA2 and LZMA4). Please see the wiki at:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils
Paused for now - awaiting reply
> configure:35724: checking for lzma_version_number in -llzma
> configure:35757: gcc -maix64 -std=gnu99 -o conftest -I/opt/64/include
> -I/opt/buildaix/include -O2 -mminimal-toc -...
2015 Nov 06
0
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
...rt any significant differences.
>>
> In particular - I wonder about lzma as I already knew this (having
> built xz a long time ago. LZMA has been replaced by XZ. Do not know
> why, and do not want to.
> BUT there is no reliable source for LZMA5 (the XZ project only reports
> LZMA2 and LZMA4). Please see the wiki at:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XZ_Utils
>
> Paused for now - awaiting reply
Well, seems I stand corrected - it is not a change since 17 October, but
since R-3.2.2 and some directories have been removed from R distribution.
However, I am wondering abo...
2015 Nov 04
2
Building R for AIX in 64-bit mode
On 2015-10-15 15:02, Prof Brian Ripley wrote:
> On 15/10/2015 13:32, Michael Felt wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Just wanted to let you know I am getting close to packaging R for AIX in
>> 64.bit mode.
>
> Which version? (You mentioned 3.1.3 and 3.2.2 far below.) There is
> little value in reporting on frozen branches, and most value in
> reporting on R-devel where