search for: lvol0_pmspare

...virt-3.2.1-6.fc26.x86_64). This way I try to create new: # vgs storage VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree storage 1 1 0 wz--n- 267.93g 0 # lvs storage -a LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert [lvol0_pmspare] storage ewi------- 68.00m lvol1 storage twi-aotz-- 267.80g 0.00 0.44 [lvol1_tdata] storage Twi-ao---- 267.80g [lvol1_tmet...

...with multiple layers of snapshots.? That pool can't be converted, directly: # lvconvert --type raid1 -m 1 VolGroup/vm_pool --yes ? Operation not permitted on LV VolGroup/vm_pool type thinpool. Is it sufficient to simply convert the tdata and tmeta LVs to raid1 type?? Should I also convert lvol0_pmspare?? Is there anything else I should consider? # lvs VolGroup/vm_pool VolGroup/vm_pool_tmeta VolGroup/vm_pool_tdata VolGroup/lvol0_pmspare ? LV????????????? VG?????? Attr?????? LSize?? Pool Origin Data% Meta%? Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert ? [lvol0_pmspare] VolGroup ewi-a----- 128.00m ? vm_pool????...

...; This way I try to create new: > > # vgs storage > VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree > storage 1 1 0 wz--n- 267.93g 0 # lvs storage -a > LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% > Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert > [lvol0_pmspare] storage ewi------- 68.00m > lvol1 storage twi-aotz-- 267.80g 0.00 0.44 > [lvol1_tdata] storage Twi-ao---- 267.80g > [lvol1_tmeta] storage ewi-ao---- 68.00m > # virsh pool-dumpxml storage > <pool type='logical'> > <name>...

...ew: >> >> # vgs storage >> VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree >> storage 1 1 0 wz--n- 267.93g 0 # lvs storage -a >> LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Meta% >> Move Log Cpy%Sync Convert >> [lvol0_pmspare] storage ewi------- 68.00m >> lvol1 storage twi-aotz-- 267.80g 0.00 0.44 >> [lvol1_tdata] storage Twi-ao---- 267.80g >> [lvol1_tmeta] storage ewi-ao---- 68.00m >> # virsh pool-dumpxml storage >> <pool type='logical'> &g...

...VG Attr LSize Pool Origin [cachedata] cl Cwi---C--- 97.66g * [cachedata_cdata] cl Cwi-ao---- 97.66g ** ** [cachedata_cmeta] cl ewi-ao---- 100.00m * * cachedlv cl Cwi-aoC--- 1.75t [cachedata] [cachedlv_corig] * [cachedlv_corig] cl owi-aoC--- 1.75t [lvol0_pmspare] cl ewi------- 100.00m root cl -wi-ao---- 46.56g swap cl -wi-ao---- 14.96g * testssd cl -wi-a----- 45.47g *[root at localhost ~]#lsblk* * NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sdd 8:48 0 163G 0 disk...

...Cwi-ao---- > 97.66g * > * [cachedata_cmeta] cl ewi-ao---- 100.00m * > > * cachedlv cl Cwi-aoC--- 1.75t [cachedata] > [cachedlv_corig] * > [cachedlv_corig] cl owi-aoC--- 1.75t > > [lvol0_pmspare] cl ewi------- 100.00m > > root cl -wi-ao---- 46.56g > > swap cl -wi-ao---- 14.96g > > > > * testssd cl -wi-a----- 45.47g *[root at localhost ~]#lsblk > > NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT >...

I?ve never had such situation and I don?t recall someone sharing something similar. Most probably it?s easier to remove the node from the TSP and re-add it.Of course , test the case in VMs just to validate that it?s possible to add a mode to a cluster with snapshots. I have a vague feeling that you will need to delete all snapshots. Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Thursday, August 10, 2023, 4:36

...cachedata] cl Cwi---C--- 97.66g > * [cachedata_cdata] cl Cwi-ao---- 97.66g ** > ** [cachedata_cmeta] cl ewi-ao---- 100.00m * > * cachedlv cl Cwi-aoC--- 1.75t [cachedata] > [cachedlv_corig] * > [cachedlv_corig] cl owi-aoC--- 1.75t > [lvol0_pmspare] cl ewi------- 100.00m > root cl -wi-ao---- 46.56g > swap cl -wi-ao---- 14.96g > * testssd cl -wi-a----- 45.47g > > *[root at localhost ~]#lsblk* > * > NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPO...