Displaying 4 results from an estimated 4 matches for "lvo001".
Did you mean:
lvol001
2018 Jul 14
2
ssm vs. lvm: moving physical drives and volume group to another system
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu> wrote:
>
> >
> > Is that first entry /dev/mapper/lvol001 right?
> I'd expect /dev/mapper/lvm_pool-lvo001
ssm list shows -
/dev/lvm_pool/lvol001
When I place /dev/lvm_pool/lvol001 into /etc/fstab the computer will
boot using kernel 514.
Kernel 862 still hangs/panics.
2018 Jul 14
3
ssm vs. lvm: moving physical drives and volume group to another system
When I change /etc/fstab from /dev/mapper/lvol001 to
/dev/lvm_pool/lvol001, kernel 3.10.0-514 will boot.
Kernel 3.10.0-862 hangs and will not boot.
On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:20 PM Mike <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Maybe not a good assumption afterall --
>
> I can no longer boot using kernel 3.10.0-514 or 3.10.0-862.
>
> boot.log shows:
>
> Dependency failed for
2018 Jul 14
0
ssm vs. lvm: moving physical drives and volume group to another system
.../mapper/lvol001 to
> /dev/lvm_pool/lvol001, kernel 3.10.0-514 will boot.
>
> Kernel 3.10.0-862 hangs and will not boot.
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:20 PM Mike <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Is that first entry /dev/mapper/lvol001 right?
I'd expect /dev/mapper/lvm_pool-lvo001
2018 Jul 14
0
ssm vs. lvm: moving physical drives and volume group to another system
...Jul 14, 2018 at 2:02 PM Mike <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 14, 2018 at 1:57 PM Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu>
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Is that first entry /dev/mapper/lvol001 right?
> > I'd expect /dev/mapper/lvm_pool-lvo001
>
> ssm list shows -
>
> /dev/lvm_pool/lvol001
>
> When I place /dev/lvm_pool/lvol001 into /etc/fstab the computer will
> boot using kernel 514.
> Kernel 862 still hangs/panics.
>
>
I don't have an answer to why kernel 514 is not booting,
but what I was trying to s...